interpellate

简明释义

英[ɪnˈtɜːpɪleɪt]美[ɪnˈterpəˌleɪt]

vt. （议员在议会中就政府的行为或政策提出）质询；质问

第 三 人 称 单 数 i n t e r p e l l a t e s

现 在 分 词 i n t e r p e l l a t i n g

过 去 式 i n t e r p e l l a t e d

过 去 分 词 i n t e r p e l l a t e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The committee will interpellate experts to gather more information before making a decision.

委员会将对专家进行质询，以收集更多信息，然后再做决定。

2.The citizens gathered to urge their representatives to interpellate the mayor regarding environmental issues.

市民们聚集起来，敦促他们的代表对市长进行质询，询问环境问题。

3.In the meeting, he proposed to interpellate the CEO about the company's future plans.

在会议上，他提议对首席执行官进行质询，询问公司的未来计划。

4.The opposition party decided to interpellate the minister about the recent budget cuts.

反对党决定对部长进行质询，询问最近的预算削减。

5.During the parliamentary session, several members chose to interpellate the government on its foreign policy.

在议会会议期间，几位成员选择对政府的外交政策进行质询。

作文

In a democratic society, the relationship between the government and its citizens is crucial for maintaining order and accountability. One of the key mechanisms through which citizens can hold their government accountable is through the process of questioning or challenging its actions. This process is often referred to as the ability to interpellate (质询). The term interpellate originates from political theory and refers to the act of questioning government officials, particularly in legislative bodies. It serves as a tool for lawmakers to demand explanations and justifications for government policies and decisions. This practice is essential in ensuring that those in power remain transparent and responsive to the needs and concerns of the public.The importance of interpellate (质询) cannot be overstated. In many countries, parliamentary systems allow members of parliament to interpellate (质询) ministers and other officials during sessions. This interaction not only provides a platform for debate but also acts as a check on power. By asking difficult questions, lawmakers can expose flaws in policy-making processes and highlight issues that may not be immediately visible to the public. For example, when a government proposes a new law, legislators can interpellate (质询) the responsible minister to clarify the rationale behind the legislation, its expected outcomes, and any potential drawbacks.Moreover, the ability to interpellate (质询) extends beyond formal legislative settings. Citizens, through various channels such as town hall meetings, public forums, and social media, can also interpellate (质询) their representatives. This grassroots engagement is vital for a healthy democracy as it empowers individuals to voice their concerns and seek accountability from those they elected. When citizens actively participate in interpellating (质询) their leaders, they reinforce the idea that government officials are not above scrutiny and must answer to the electorate.However, the effectiveness of the interpellation (质询) process can vary significantly across different political systems. In some countries, the practice is robust, with a strong tradition of parliamentary questioning that leads to meaningful dialogue and policy adjustments. In contrast, in more authoritarian regimes, the opportunity to interpellate (质询) may be limited or even suppressed, leading to a lack of accountability and transparency. In these environments, citizens may feel disempowered and reluctant to challenge their leaders, resulting in a disconnect between the government and the populace.In conclusion, the act of interpellate (质询) is fundamental to the functioning of a democratic society. It allows for the questioning of authority, promotes accountability, and encourages active citizen participation. As we navigate complex political landscapes, understanding the significance of interpellate (质询) is essential for fostering a culture of transparency and responsiveness in governance. Ultimately, when citizens and lawmakers engage in this practice, they contribute to a healthier democracy where the voices of the people are heard and respected.

在民主社会中，政府与公民之间的关系对于维护秩序和问责至关重要。公民可以通过质疑或挑战政府的行为来追究其责任，这一过程是关键机制之一。这一过程通常被称为能够interpellate（质询）。术语interpellate源于政治理论，指的是在立法机构中质询政府官员的行为。它作为立法者要求政府政策和决策的解释和辩护的工具，是确保掌权者对公众需求和关注保持透明和响应的必要手段。interpellate（质询）的重要性不容小觑。在许多国家，议会制度允许议会议员在会议期间interpellate（质询）部长和其他官员。这种互动不仅提供了辩论的平台，还作为对权力的制衡。通过提出困难的问题，立法者可以揭示政策制定过程中的缺陷，并突出可能对公众不立即可见的问题。例如，当政府提出一项新法律时，立法者可以interpellate（质询）负责的部长，以阐明立法背后的理由、预期结果以及任何潜在缺陷。此外，interpellate（质询）的能力超越了正式的立法环境。公民通过各种渠道，如市政厅会议、公共论坛和社交媒体，也可以interpellate（质询）他们的代表。这种草根参与对于健康的民主至关重要，因为它赋予个人发声的权力，并寻求对所选领导人的问责。当公民积极参与interpellating（质询）他们的领导人时，他们强化了政府官员并非高于审查的观念，必须对选民作出回应。然而，interpellation（质询）过程的有效性在不同的政治体制中可能差异显著。在某些国家，该实践非常强大，拥有强烈的议会质询传统，导致有意义的对话和政策调整。相比之下，在更专制的政权中，interpellate（质询）的机会可能有限甚至被压制，导致缺乏问责和透明度。在这些环境中，公民可能感到无能为力，不愿挑战他们的领导者，导致政府与民众之间的脱节。总之，interpellate（质询）行为是民主社会运作的基础。它允许对权威进行质疑，促进问责，鼓励积极的公民参与。在我们应对复杂的政治环境时，理解interpellate（质询）的重要性对于培养治理透明和响应文化至关重要。最终，当公民和立法者参与这一实践时，他们为一个更健康的民主作出贡献，使人民的声音得到倾听和尊重。