ban

简明释义

英[bæn]美[bæn]

n. 禁止，禁令；逐出令；<史>褫夺公民权的判决；<古>诅咒；巴尼（罗马尼亚货币单位，复数bani）

v. 禁止，取缔；（官方）把（某人）逐出某地

【名】 （Ban）（美、罗马、克罗地亚）班恩（人名）

复 数 b a n s

第 三 人 称 单 数 b a n s

现 在 分 词 b a n n i n g

过 去 式 b a n n e d

过 去 分 词 b a n n e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Most chose not to impose any ban.

大多数选择不实施任何禁令。

2.I don't think we can go around screaming hysterically: "Ban these dogs. Muzzle all dogs."

我认为我们不能歇斯底里地四处高喊：“禁止养这些狗。给所有的狗戴上口套。”

3.Doctors are pushing for a ban on all cigarette advertising.

医生们正力求禁止所有香烟广告。

4.The company slapped a ban on using email on the staff.

公司对员工使用电子邮件发出禁令。

5.The pressure group is pushing for a ban on GM foods.

压力集团正强烈要求取缔转基因食品。

6.It is not clear whether the ban was issued because they tried to flee.

不清楚发布这个禁令是否是因为他们曾试图逃跑。

7.Many countries have imposed a ban on single-use plastics.

许多国家对一次性塑料实施了禁令。

8.The school has a strict ban on mobile phones during class.

学校对课堂上使用手机有严格的禁令。

9.The city council voted to ban smoking in public parks.

市议会投票决定在公共公园内禁止吸烟。

10.The government decided to ban tobacco advertising on television.

政府决定在电视上禁止烟草广告。

11.They announced a temporary ban on all flights due to the storm.

由于暴风雨，他们宣布对所有航班实施临时禁令。

作文

In recent years, many countries have implemented a ban on plastic bags to combat environmental pollution. The decision to impose a ban is often met with mixed reactions from the public. On one hand, environmentalists argue that such a ban is necessary to reduce waste and protect wildlife. They point out that millions of animals die each year due to plastic ingestion or entanglement. On the other hand, some people believe that a ban on plastic bags limits consumer choice and may lead to inconvenience. They argue that reusable bags can be easily forgotten, leading to situations where individuals are forced to purchase more plastic bags anyway.The effectiveness of a ban can also vary depending on how it is enforced. In some regions, fines are imposed on those who continue to use plastic bags, while others rely on public education campaigns to encourage compliance. Countries like Kenya have taken drastic measures by imposing very high fines for using plastic bags, effectively creating a strong deterrent against their use. This strict enforcement has led to a significant decrease in plastic bag usage, demonstrating that a well-implemented ban can yield positive results.However, it is essential to consider the economic impact of such a ban. Many businesses that produce or sell plastic bags face financial challenges when a ban is enacted. Transitioning to alternative materials can be costly, and small businesses may struggle to adapt. Therefore, governments must provide support and resources to help these businesses transition smoothly. This could include subsidies for biodegradable bag production or grants for businesses that implement sustainable practices.Moreover, the success of a ban on plastic bags often depends on public awareness and participation. Education plays a crucial role in informing the public about the environmental consequences of plastic waste. Campaigns that highlight the benefits of reducing plastic use can motivate individuals to change their habits. For instance, community workshops can teach people how to make their own reusable bags, fostering a sense of responsibility and engagement.In addition to plastic bags, there are other areas where bans can be beneficial. For example, many cities have introduced bans on smoking in public places to protect non-smokers from secondhand smoke. These bans have been shown to improve public health outcomes significantly. Similarly, bans on certain pesticides have been enacted to protect pollinators like bees, which are vital for our ecosystem.In conclusion, while the imposition of a ban can be controversial, it is often a necessary step towards creating a more sustainable future. Whether it is a ban on plastic bags, smoking, or harmful chemicals, the goal remains the same: to protect our environment and public health. To ensure the success of a ban, it is vital to consider its economic implications, enforce it effectively, and engage the public through education and support. Only then can we truly make a difference in the fight against pollution and promote a healthier planet for future generations.

近年来，许多国家实施了对塑料袋的禁令以应对环境污染。实施禁令的决定常常会引起公众的不同反应。一方面，环保人士认为这样的禁令是减少废物和保护野生动物所必需的。他们指出，每年有数百万动物因误食或缠绕塑料而死亡。另一方面，一些人认为，对塑料袋的禁令限制了消费者的选择，可能导致不便。他们辩称，可重复使用的袋子很容易被遗忘，导致个人不得不购买更多的塑料袋。禁令的有效性也取决于其执行方式。在某些地区，继续使用塑料袋的人会受到罚款，而其他地方则依靠公共教育活动来鼓励遵守。像肯尼亚这样的国家采取了极端措施，对使用塑料袋的人处以非常高的罚款，有效地形成了强有力的威慑。这种严格的执行导致塑料袋使用显著减少，证明了一个良好实施的禁令可以产生积极的结果。然而，必须考虑这种禁令的经济影响。当禁令实施时，生产或销售塑料袋的许多企业面临财务挑战。过渡到替代材料可能成本高昂，小企业可能难以适应。因此，政府必须提供支持和资源，以帮助这些企业顺利过渡。这可以包括对生物降解袋生产的补贴或对实施可持续实践的企业的资助。此外，塑料袋的禁令的成功往往依赖于公众意识和参与。教育在告知公众塑料废物的环境后果方面发挥着至关重要的作用。强调减少塑料使用好处的活动可以激励个人改变习惯。例如，社区研讨会可以教人们如何制作自己的可重复使用袋，培养责任感和参与感。除了塑料袋，还有其他领域的禁令也可能是有益的。例如，许多城市已经在公共场所实施了吸烟禁令，以保护非吸烟者免受二手烟的危害。这些禁令已被证明显著改善了公共健康结果。类似地，某些农药的禁令已被颁布，以保护像蜜蜂这样的授粉者，而蜜蜂对我们的生态系统至关重要。总之，尽管实施禁令可能存在争议，但它通常是朝着创建更可持续未来迈出的必要一步。无论是对塑料袋、吸烟还是有害化学物质的禁令，目标始终是相同的：保护我们的环境和公共健康。为了确保禁令的成功，至关重要的是考虑其经济影响，有效执行，并通过教育和支持与公众互动。只有这样，我们才能在抗击污染的斗争中真正有所作为，并为后代促进一个更健康的星球。