imprisonment

简明释义

英[ɪmˈprɪznmənt]美[ɪmˈprɪznmənt]

n. 监禁，关押

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Prosecution for a first minor offence rarely leads to imprisonment.

因初犯轻罪被控者很少被判监禁。

2.He was condemned to life imprisonment.

他被判终身监禁。

3.In Canada, racial ghettoization and imprisonment is still a matter of state policy.

在加拿大，种族隔离和监禁仍然是国家政策的问题。

4.His wife was sentenced to seven years imprisonment for aiding and abetting him.

他的妻子因与他同谋被判决关押七年。

5.His arrest and imprisonment were expected and could have been avoided.

他的被捕入狱本在预料之中、是可以避免的。

6.She was sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment for poisoning and attempted murder.

她因投毒和谋杀未遂而被判处了20年监禁。

7.The offence carries a maximum sentence of two year's imprisonment.

该罪行可最多可判处两年监禁。

8.Community service is seen as the only credible alternative to imprisonment.

除监禁外，社区劳动被看作是唯一可接受的选择。

9.His wrongful conviction led to years of imprisonment before he was exonerated.

他的错误定罪导致他被监禁多年，直到他被证明无罪。

10.The documentary highlighted the harsh realities of imprisonment in overcrowded prisons.

这部纪录片突显了在拥挤监狱中监禁的严酷现实。

11.The judge sentenced him to five years of imprisonment for his crimes.

法官判处他五年监禁作为对其罪行的惩罚。

12.Many activists argue that political imprisonment is a violation of human rights.

许多活动家认为政治监禁是对人权的侵犯。

13.After a lengthy trial, she was relieved to avoid imprisonment altogether.

经过漫长的审判，她很高兴完全避免了监禁。

作文

The concept of imprisonment is often associated with the loss of freedom and the confinement of individuals within a physical space, such as a prison. However, it also extends beyond the literal bars and walls of a jail cell. Imprisonment can manifest in various forms, affecting not only the body but also the mind and spirit. This essay aims to explore the multifaceted nature of imprisonment, its implications on society, and the potential paths toward rehabilitation and freedom.Firstly, it is essential to understand that imprisonment serves as a form of punishment for those who violate laws. The legal system employs imprisonment to deter crime and protect society from individuals deemed dangerous or harmful. However, the effectiveness of this approach is often debated. Critics argue that imprisonment does not address the root causes of criminal behavior, such as poverty, lack of education, and mental health issues. Instead of rehabilitating offenders, many prisons become breeding grounds for further criminality, where inmates learn more about the underworld rather than reintegrating into society.Moreover, the experience of imprisonment can have profound psychological effects on individuals. The isolation and deprivation of freedom can lead to feelings of despair, anxiety, and depression. Many inmates struggle with their identity and self-worth while serving their sentences. The stigma attached to having been incarcerated can make it challenging for them to find employment and rebuild their lives upon release. This cycle of imprisonment and recidivism highlights the need for comprehensive rehabilitation programs that focus on education, vocational training, and mental health support.In addition to the individual impacts, imprisonment raises significant societal concerns. The overpopulation of prisons has become a pressing issue in many countries, straining resources and leading to inhumane living conditions. The high costs associated with maintaining prisons and the judicial system divert funds from essential services like education and healthcare. Furthermore, marginalized communities often bear the brunt of imprisonment, as systemic inequalities result in higher incarceration rates among specific demographic groups. Addressing these disparities is crucial for creating a more equitable society.On a more positive note, there are various initiatives aimed at reforming the traditional notions of imprisonment. Restorative justice programs emphasize healing for both victims and offenders, focusing on accountability and making amends rather than punitive measures. These approaches encourage dialogue and understanding, which can lead to reduced recidivism and a more compassionate society.In conclusion, imprisonment is a complex issue that encompasses far more than mere confinement. It affects individuals' lives, influences societal structures, and poses significant challenges that require thoughtful solutions. By recognizing the limitations of traditional imprisonment practices and advocating for reform, we can work towards a future where rehabilitation takes precedence over punishment, ultimately fostering a more just and humane society. Understanding and addressing the nuances of imprisonment is vital for creating a system that not only punishes but also heals and reintegrates individuals into the community.

‘监禁’这一概念通常与失去自由和将个人限制在一个物理空间（如监狱）内相关联。然而，它也超越了监狱的字面意义，表现为多种形式，影响着身体、思想和精神。本文旨在探讨‘监禁’的多面性、其对社会的影响以及通往康复和自由的潜在路径。首先，理解‘监禁’作为对违反法律者的一种惩罚形式是至关重要的。法律体系采用‘监禁’来威慑犯罪，并保护社会免受被认为危险或有害的个人的侵害。然而，这种方法的有效性常常受到争议。批评者认为，‘监禁’并没有解决犯罪行为的根本原因，例如贫困、缺乏教育和心理健康问题。许多监狱反而成为进一步犯罪的温床，囚犯在这里学到的更多是地下世界的知识，而不是重新融入社会。此外，‘监禁’的经历对个人可能产生深远的心理影响。隔离和失去自由感会导致绝望、焦虑和抑郁的情绪。许多囚犯在服刑期间努力应对自己的身份和自我价值。由于曾经被监禁而附带的污名，使得他们在释放后很难找到工作和重建生活。这种‘监禁’与再犯的循环突显了全面康复项目的必要性，这些项目应关注教育、职业培训和心理健康支持。除了个人影响外，‘监禁’还引发了重大的社会问题。监狱过度拥挤已成为许多国家面临的紧迫问题，资源紧张导致不人道的生活条件。与维持监狱和司法系统相关的高昂成本使得资金从教育和医疗等基本服务中转移。此外，边缘化社区往往承受着‘监禁’的重压，系统性不平等导致特定人群的入狱率更高。解决这些差距对于创建一个更加公平的社会至关重要。更积极的一面是，针对传统‘监禁’观念的各种改革倡议正在进行中。恢复性司法项目强调受害者和犯罪者的愈合，专注于责任和弥补，而非惩罚措施。这些方法鼓励对话和理解，从而可以减少再犯率，促进更具同情心的社会。总之，‘监禁’是一个复杂的问题，包含的内容远不止简单的拘禁。它影响个人生活，影响社会结构，并带来了需要深思熟虑的重大挑战。通过认识到传统‘监禁’做法的局限性并倡导改革，我们可以朝着一个优先考虑康复而非惩罚的未来迈进，最终促进一个更加公正和人道的社会。理解和解决‘监禁’的细微差别对于创建一个不仅惩罚而且治愈和重新融入社区的系统至关重要。