litigate

简明释义

英[ˈlɪtɪɡeɪt]美[ˈlɪtɪɡeɪt]

vt. 在法庭相争；提出诉讼

vi. 对簿法庭

第 三 人 称 单 数 l i t i g a t e s

现 在 分 词 l i t i g a t i n g

过 去 式 l i t i g a t e d

过 去 分 词 l i t i g a t e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.When I litigate in New Jersey or New York, it takes five to ten years to get to trial. Out in Nevada, it only takes a year.

如果是在新泽西或者纽约提起诉讼，需要5到10年时间才能进行审判，而在内华达，却只需要1年时间。

2.A sales representative who signs an agreement without running it past the GC may discover later that a venue jurisdiction clause requires the company to litigate the matter half a continent away.

销售代表未经法律总监同意就签约，事后可能会发现按照管辖权条款，其诉讼只能向半个大陆远的某法院提出。

3.If we have to litigate, we will.

如果我们必须提起诉讼的话，我们会的。

4.She said no more energy and money to litigate.

她说再也没有精力和钱去打官司了。

5.The new law also grants them the right to litigate.

新法授予他们提起诉讼的权利。

6.BARACK OBAMA: "I think we'd be misreading the election if we thought that the American people want to see us for the next two years re-litigate arguments that we had over the last two years."

奥巴马：“如果我们认为美国人民希望看到我们在未来2年，重新审议过去2年已经通过的法案。那么我们就错误的解读了选民的想法。”

7.They still will be in that day afternoon court of more beautiful district and an Internet bar litigate.

当天下午他们还将在越秀区法院与另外一家网吧对簿公堂。

8.He was advised to litigate his case instead of accepting the settlement offer.

他被建议诉讼他的案件，而不是接受和解提议。

9.The plaintiff chose to litigate after exhausting all other options.

原告在耗尽所有其他选择后选择了诉讼。

10.The company decided to litigate the contract dispute in court.

公司决定在法庭上诉讼合同争议。

11.Many businesses prefer to resolve issues through mediation rather than litigate.

许多企业更喜欢通过调解而不是诉讼来解决问题。

12.If we cannot settle this matter amicably, we may have to litigate.

如果我们无法友好解决此事，我们可能不得不诉讼。

作文

In the realm of law, the term litigate refers to the process of taking a dispute or case to court in order to seek a resolution. This legal action can arise from various situations such as contract disputes, personal injury claims, or even criminal charges. The act of litigate is not merely about presenting a case before a judge; it involves a complex series of steps that require careful planning and execution. Understanding the implications of litigate is crucial for anyone involved in legal matters, whether they are plaintiffs, defendants, or legal professionals.When parties decide to litigate, they often embark on a lengthy journey through the judicial system. Initially, both sides will engage in a process known as discovery, where they exchange information and gather evidence to support their claims. This phase can be quite intensive, as it may involve depositions, interrogatories, and document requests. The goal of discovery is to ensure that both parties have a clear understanding of the facts and evidence before the trial begins.Once the discovery phase is complete, the parties may attempt to resolve their differences through negotiation or mediation. However, if these efforts fail, the case will proceed to trial, where both sides will present their arguments and evidence before a judge or jury. The process of litigate at this stage can be emotionally and financially draining, as legal fees can accumulate quickly, and the outcome is often uncertain.It is essential to recognize that litigate is not always the best course of action. Many legal experts advocate for alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods, such as arbitration or mediation, which can be more cost-effective and less time-consuming than traditional litigation. These alternatives allow parties to reach a settlement without the need for a formal court trial, thereby minimizing stress and preserving relationships.Moreover, the decision to litigate should be made with careful consideration of the potential risks and rewards. Factors such as the strength of the case, the likelihood of success, and the financial implications must all be weighed. In some instances, pursuing a case through litigation may result in a favorable outcome, while in others, it could lead to significant losses.In conclusion, the term litigate encompasses a vital aspect of the legal system, representing the pursuit of justice through formal court proceedings. While it can serve as a powerful tool for resolving disputes, it is essential to approach the decision to litigate with caution and thorough understanding. Legal battles can be arduous, and exploring alternative solutions may often yield better results for all parties involved. Ultimately, the choice to litigate should be informed by a comprehensive evaluation of the circumstances at hand, emphasizing the importance of strategic legal thinking in navigating the complexities of the law.

在法律领域，术语litigate指的是将争端或案件提交法庭以寻求解决的过程。这种法律行动可能源于各种情况，如合同纠纷、个人伤害索赔，甚至刑事指控。litigate的行为不仅仅是向法官提出案件；它涉及一系列复杂的步骤，需要仔细的规划和执行。理解litigate的含义对任何涉及法律事务的人来说都是至关重要的，无论他们是原告、被告还是法律专业人士。当各方决定litigate时，他们通常会开始一段漫长的司法系统之旅。最初，双方将参与一个称为发现的过程，在此过程中，他们交换信息并收集证据以支持他们的主张。这个阶段可能相当密集，因为它可能涉及证词、询问和文档请求。发现的目标是确保双方在审判开始之前对事实和证据有清晰的理解。一旦发现阶段完成，各方可能会尝试通过谈判或调解来解决分歧。然而，如果这些努力失败，案件将进入审判阶段，双方将在法官或陪审团面前陈述他们的论点和证据。在这一阶段，litigate的过程可能会情感和财务上都令人疲惫，因为法律费用可能迅速累积，结果往往是不确定的。必须认识到，litigate并不总是最佳的行动方案。许多法律专家提倡替代争端解决（ADR）方法，如仲裁或调解，这些方法可能比传统诉讼更具成本效益且耗时更少。这些替代方案允许各方在无需正式法庭审判的情况下达成和解，从而最小化压力并维护关系。此外，决定litigate应谨慎考虑潜在的风险和收益。案件的强度、成功的可能性和财务影响等因素都必须权衡。在某些情况下，通过诉讼追求案件可能会导致有利的结果，而在其他情况下，它可能会导致重大损失。总之，术语litigate涵盖了法律系统的一个重要方面，代表着通过正式法庭程序追求正义。尽管它可以作为解决争端的强大工具，但在做出litigate的决定时，必须谨慎行事并深入理解。法律斗争可能是艰巨的，探索替代解决方案通常可能为所有相关方带来更好的结果。最终，选择litigate应基于对手头情况的全面评估，强调在驾驭法律复杂性时战略性法律思维的重要性。