disputable

简明释义

英[dɪˈspjuːtəb(ə)l]美[dɪˈspjuːtəbl]

adj. 有争议的，有待讨论的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.His architectural gestures remain dipped into the surroundings and don't subjugate them to disputable formalisms.

他的建筑的姿态沉浸在它的周遭环境之中，而不是使环境服从于有待商榷的形式主义之下。

2.In the history of literature, Dingling has been a unique disputable being all the time.

在文学史上，丁玲一直是一个独特的有争议的角色。

3.Results in recent years, interventional therapy to acute coronary arteries syndrome is a disputable subject.

结果：近年来，急性冠状动脉综合征的介入治疗一直是一个有争议的课题。

4.In the literary education, the relation between aesthetic and enlightenment is a disputable question.

在文学教育中，审美与启蒙的矛盾一直是一个争论不休的话题。

5.Accept him whose faith is weak, without passing judgment on disputable matters.

信心软弱的、你们要接纳、但不要辩论所疑惑的事。

6.Calm is not mediocrity. It is an attitude to life, it's disputable, it's wisdom in rain or shine. It's a pursuit of simple life.

淡定不是平庸，它是一种生活态度，是智慧的不争，是宠辱不惊，是对简单生活的一种追求。

7.Calm is not mediocrity. It is an attitude to life, it's disputable, it's wisdom in rain or shine. It's a pursuit...

淡定不是平庸，它是一种生活态度，是智慧的不争，是宠辱不惊，是对简单生活的一种追求。

8.Thus it is disputable and temporary theory, sometimes it can't win public acceptation.

所以它是有争议的、冒风险的、暂时的，有时不能像论证推理那样博得大家的公认。

9.The third part is the study of the fulfillment of duty to disclosure. The author mainly selects some disputable questions to discuss from experience.

第三部分是告知义务履行问题研究，主要从实务者的角度选取告知义务履行中易产生争议的部分进行探讨。

10.Some of the data in the report is disputable due to lack of sources.

报告中的一些数据由于缺乏来源而是有争议的。

11.Whether the policy will be effective is still disputable.

该政策是否有效仍然是有争议的。

12.The scientist presented findings that were highly disputable.

这位科学家提出的发现是高度有争议的。

13.The historian's interpretation of events was disputable among his peers.

这位历史学家对事件的解读在他的同行中是有争议的。

14.In debates, some opinions are often disputable and can lead to heated arguments.

在辩论中，一些观点常常是有争议的，可能导致激烈的争论。

作文

In the realm of academic discourse, few concepts are as vital as the ability to engage with ideas that are disputable. The term disputable refers to something that can be argued against or is open to debate. This characteristic is not merely a feature of intellectual discussions; it is a cornerstone of critical thinking and scholarly inquiry. In this essay, I will explore the importance of engaging with disputable ideas, how they foster a deeper understanding of subjects, and the role they play in promoting healthy debates in society.First and foremost, engaging with disputable ideas encourages individuals to develop their critical thinking skills. When students or researchers encounter a claim that is disputable, they are prompted to analyze the evidence supporting that claim and consider alternative viewpoints. For instance, in the field of climate change, there are disputable arguments regarding the extent of human impact on global warming. By examining these disputable claims, individuals can better understand the complexities of environmental science and the various factors that contribute to climate change. This process of evaluation not only enhances one’s knowledge but also cultivates an open-minded approach to learning.Moreover, disputable ideas serve as a catalyst for dialogue and discussion among peers. In any academic setting, the exchange of disputable viewpoints can lead to richer conversations and collaborative learning experiences. For example, during a debate on the ethics of artificial intelligence, participants may present disputable arguments regarding the potential benefits and risks associated with AI technology. Through respectful discourse, individuals can challenge each other’s perspectives, leading to a more nuanced understanding of the topic at hand. Such interactions not only deepen knowledge but also promote empathy and respect for differing opinions.Furthermore, the presence of disputable issues in society is essential for democracy and civic engagement. A healthy democracy thrives on the ability of its citizens to question, critique, and discuss policies and practices openly. When citizens engage with disputable political ideas, they contribute to a vibrant public sphere where diverse opinions can coexist. For instance, discussions surrounding healthcare reform often involve disputable viewpoints on the best approaches to achieve universal coverage. By debating these disputable ideas, citizens become more informed and active participants in the democratic process, ultimately leading to better governance and accountability.In conclusion, the ability to engage with disputable ideas is crucial for personal growth, academic development, and societal progress. By critically analyzing disputable claims, individuals enhance their understanding of complex issues and cultivate essential skills in reasoning and argumentation. Furthermore, fostering discussions around disputable topics encourages collaboration and respect for diverse perspectives, which are fundamental to a healthy academic environment and a thriving democracy. As we continue to navigate an increasingly complex world, embracing disputable ideas will undoubtedly play a significant role in shaping our understanding and responses to the challenges we face.

在学术话语的领域，参与与可争议的想法的能力是至关重要的。术语“可争议的”指的是可以被反驳或开放辩论的事物。这一特征不仅仅是智力讨论的一个特征；它是批判性思维和学术探究的基石。在这篇文章中，我将探讨参与可争议的想法的重要性，它们如何促进对主题的更深理解，以及它们在促进社会健康辩论中所扮演的角色。首先，参与可争议的想法鼓励个人发展他们的批判性思维技能。当学生或研究人员遇到一个可争议的主张时，他们会被促使分析支持该主张的证据，并考虑替代观点。例如，在气候变化领域，关于人类对全球变暖影响程度的论点是可争议的。通过审视这些可争议的主张，个人可以更好地理解环境科学的复杂性以及导致气候变化的各种因素。这一评估过程不仅增强了个人的知识，还培养了开放的学习态度。此外，可争议的想法作为同龄人之间对话和讨论的催化剂。在任何学术环境中，交换可争议的观点可以导致更丰富的对话和协作学习体验。例如，在关于人工智能伦理的辩论中，参与者可能会提出关于AI技术潜在好处和风险的可争议论点。通过尊重的讨论，个人可以挑战彼此的观点，从而对主题有更细致的理解。这种互动不仅加深了知识，也促进了对不同意见的同情和尊重。此外，社会中存在可争议问题对民主和公民参与至关重要。一个健康的民主制度依赖于其公民能够公开质疑、批判和讨论政策和实践。当公民参与可争议的政治思想时，他们为一个充满活力的公共领域做出贡献，在这个领域中多样的意见可以共存。例如，围绕医疗改革的讨论通常涉及关于实现全民覆盖的最佳方法的可争议观点。通过辩论这些可争议的想法，公民成为更加知情和积极参与民主过程的一部分，最终导致更好的治理和问责。总之，参与可争议的想法的能力对个人成长、学术发展和社会进步至关重要。通过批判性地分析可争议的主张，个人增强了对复杂问题的理解，并培养了推理和论证的基本技能。此外，围绕可争议主题的讨论鼓励合作和对多样化观点的尊重，这对于健康的学术环境和繁荣的民主制度都是基础。随着我们继续应对一个日益复杂的世界，拥抱可争议的想法无疑将在塑造我们对所面临挑战的理解和应对中发挥重要作用。