confutation

简明释义

英[ˌkɒnfjuːˈteɪʃən]美[ˌkɑːnfjuːˈteɪʃn]

n. 驳斥；驳倒

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The debate ended with a clear confutation 反驳 of the opponent's main arguments.

辩论以对对手主要论点的清晰confutation反驳结束。

2.In her paper, she included a detailed confutation 反驳 of the opposing viewpoint.

在她的论文中，她详细地包含了对立观点的confutation反驳。

3.His argument was so strong that it led to the confutation 驳斥 of many common misconceptions.

他的论点如此强大，以至于导致了许多常见误解的confutation驳斥。

4.The scientist presented a thorough confutation 反驳 of the previous theory during the conference.

科学家在会议上对之前的理论进行了彻底的confutation反驳。

5.The lawyer's confutation 驳斥 of the evidence presented by the prosecution was compelling.

律师对检方提出的证据的confutation驳斥令人信服。

作文

In the realm of academic discourse, the concept of confutation plays a pivotal role in the development of sound arguments and the refinement of ideas. Confutation refers to the act of disproving or refuting a statement, theory, or argument. It is an essential process in critical thinking and debate, as it allows individuals to challenge existing beliefs and promote a deeper understanding of various subjects.One of the most significant aspects of confutation is its ability to foster intellectual growth. When individuals encounter opposing viewpoints, they are compelled to examine their own beliefs more closely. This scrutiny can lead to a more nuanced understanding of the topic at hand. For instance, in a debate about climate change, one might present scientific data supporting human impact on the environment. However, if an opponent presents credible evidence suggesting alternative explanations, the initial speaker must engage in confutation, addressing the new information and either reinforcing their original argument or modifying it based on the new insights.Moreover, confutation serves as a safeguard against misinformation and fallacious reasoning. In today's age of information overload, where opinions often masquerade as facts, the ability to critically evaluate claims is more crucial than ever. By employing confutation, individuals can sift through the noise and identify valid arguments. For example, during discussions about public health policies, it is vital to distinguish between scientifically supported recommendations and those based on anecdotal evidence. Engaging in confutation helps clarify these distinctions and promotes informed decision-making.In addition to its role in personal development and public discourse, confutation also contributes to the advancement of knowledge within academic fields. Scholars often publish research that challenges prevailing theories, prompting further investigation and debate. This process of confutation is essential for scientific progress, as it encourages researchers to refine their hypotheses and methodologies. The history of science is replete with examples where established beliefs were overturned through rigorous confutation. For instance, the transition from Newtonian physics to Einstein's theory of relativity exemplifies how challenging accepted norms can lead to groundbreaking discoveries.However, it is important to approach confutation with respect and an open mind. Engaging in constructive dialogue requires not only the ability to argue effectively but also the willingness to listen and learn from others. When individuals resort to personal attacks or dismissive tactics, the process of confutation becomes counterproductive and may stifle meaningful conversation. Therefore, fostering an environment where confutation can occur in a respectful manner is crucial for promoting healthy discourse.In conclusion, confutation is a vital component of effective communication and critical thinking. It enables individuals to challenge assumptions, refine their understanding, and contribute to the collective pursuit of knowledge. By embracing confutation as a tool for growth and learning, we can cultivate a culture of inquiry that values evidence-based reasoning and respectful debate. As we navigate the complexities of modern discourse, let us remember the importance of confutation in shaping our perspectives and advancing our understanding of the world around us.

在学术讨论的领域中，confutation的概念在论证的发展和思想的完善中扮演着关键角色。confutation指的是驳斥或反驳一个陈述、理论或论点的行为。这是批判性思维和辩论中的一个重要过程，因为它允许个人挑战现有信念，并促进对各种主题的更深入理解。confutation的一个重要方面是它能够促进智力成长。当个人遇到对立观点时，他们被迫更仔细地审视自己的信念。这种审视可以导致对当下主题的更细致理解。例如，在关于气候变化的辩论中，某人可能会提出支持人类对环境影响的科学数据。然而，如果对手提供了可信的证据，建议替代解释，最初的发言者必须进行confutation，解决新信息并根据新的见解强化或修改他们的原始论点。此外，confutation也作为对抗错误信息和谬误推理的保障。在当今信息过载的时代，意见常常伪装成事实，批判性评估主张的能力比以往任何时候都更加重要。通过利用confutation，个人可以筛选噪音并识别有效的论点。例如，在讨论公共卫生政策时，区分科学支持的建议和基于轶事证据的建议至关重要。参与confutation有助于澄清这些区别并促进知情决策。除了在个人发展和公共话语中的作用外，confutation还促进了学术领域知识的进步。学者们经常发表挑战现行理论的研究，促使进一步的调查和辩论。这个confutation的过程对于科学进步至关重要，因为它鼓励研究人员完善他们的假设和方法论。科学史上充满了通过严格的confutation推翻既定信念的例子。例如，从牛顿物理学到爱因斯坦相对论的转变就是一个挑战公认规范如何导致突破性发现的经典例子。然而，以尊重和开放的心态来进行confutation是重要的。参与建设性对话不仅需要有效辩论的能力，还需要倾听和学习他人的意愿。当个人诉诸于人身攻击或轻蔑的策略时，confutation的过程变得适得其反，可能会抑制有意义的对话。因此，营造一个能够以尊重的方式进行confutation的环境对于促进健康的讨论至关重要。总之，confutation是有效沟通和批判性思维的重要组成部分。它使个人能够挑战假设，完善理解，并为集体追求知识做出贡献。通过将confutation视为成长和学习的工具，我们可以培养一种重视基于证据的推理和尊重辩论的探究文化。当我们在现代话语的复杂性中航行时，让我们记住confutation在塑造我们的观点和推动我们对周围世界理解中的重要性。