misdescribe

简明释义

英[/ˌmɪs.dɪˈskraɪb/]美[/ˌmɪs.dɪˈskraɪb/]

v. 错误地描写；错误地叙述

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Some of these complaints are well-founded, others are not; but even if all were true, they would misdescribe and undervalue what is going on here.

这些问题中有些是有根有据的，有些则不是；但即使它们都是真的，他们都选择掩饰或轻描淡写地处理。

2.Some of these complaints are well-founded, others are not; but even if all were true, they would misdescribe and undervalue what is going on here.

这些问题中有些是有根有据的，有些则不是；但即使它们都是真的，他们都选择掩饰或轻描淡写地处理。

3.In court, it's crucial not to misdescribe the events that took place, as it can affect the outcome.

在法庭上，不要误描述发生的事件至关重要，因为这可能影响结果。

4.The report may misdescribe the company's financial status, leading to poor investment decisions.

这份报告可能会误描述公司的财务状况，导致错误的投资决策。

5.If you misdescribe the product features, customers might be disappointed when they receive it.

如果你误描述产品特性，顾客在收到商品时可能会感到失望。

6.The teacher warned us not to misdescribe the scientific concepts in our essays.

老师警告我们不要在论文中误描述科学概念。

7.He tends to misdescribe his experiences, making them sound more exciting than they really were.

他倾向于误描述自己的经历，让它们听起来比实际更令人兴奋。

作文

In the world of communication, clarity and accuracy are paramount. When we share information, whether in writing or speaking, we aim to convey our thoughts as precisely as possible. Unfortunately, there are times when we may unintentionally misdescribe something, leading to confusion and misunderstandings. To misdescribe (错误描述) means to inaccurately depict or explain something, which can have significant consequences depending on the context. This essay will explore the implications of misdescribing information and the importance of striving for accuracy in our communications.One common area where misdescription occurs is in academic writing. Students often struggle to express their ideas clearly, and in doing so, they may misdescribe concepts or theories. For instance, a student writing about a scientific theory might incorrectly summarize its principles, leading readers to misunderstand the fundamental ideas being presented. This not only affects the student's grade but also contributes to the spread of misinformation within the academic community. Therefore, it is crucial for students to take the time to research thoroughly and ensure that they accurately represent the information they are discussing.Similarly, in the realm of journalism, the stakes are even higher. Journalists have a responsibility to report facts accurately, as their work shapes public perception and opinion. If a journalist misdescribes an event or misquotes an individual, it can lead to public outrage or misinformation. For example, if a news article misdescribes a political figure's statement, it could unfairly tarnish their reputation or influence public discourse in a negative way. Thus, journalists must adhere to ethical standards and fact-check their work diligently to avoid misdescribing information.Moreover, in everyday conversations, we can also misdescribe situations without realizing it. When recounting a story, if we fail to recall details accurately, we might inadvertently change the meaning of the narrative. For example, if someone tells a friend about a movie they watched but misdescribes the plot or characters, it could lead to confusion or a lack of interest in the film. This highlights the importance of being mindful of how we communicate, as even small inaccuracies can lead to larger misunderstandings.To combat the tendency to misdescribe, individuals should cultivate habits that promote careful communication. First, taking the time to verify facts before sharing information can prevent misdescription. Whether it's checking sources in academic writing or confirming quotes in journalism, diligence is key. Additionally, seeking feedback from peers can help identify potential inaccuracies before information is published or shared. Engaging in discussions with others can also clarify our understanding and prevent us from misdescribing concepts.In conclusion, misdescribing information can have far-reaching effects, from academic settings to journalism and everyday conversations. As communicators, we must strive for accuracy and clarity to ensure that our messages are understood as intended. By being diligent in our research, fact-checking, and seeking feedback, we can minimize the risk of misdescribing information and contribute to a more informed society. Ultimately, the goal is to communicate effectively, fostering understanding and connection rather than confusion and misinformation.

在交流的世界中，清晰和准确是至关重要的。当我们分享信息时，无论是书面还是口头，我们都希望尽可能精确地传达我们的想法。不幸的是，有时我们可能会无意中错误描述某些事物，从而导致混淆和误解。错误描述（misdescribe）意味着不准确地描绘或解释某事，这在不同的上下文中可能会产生重大后果。本文将探讨错误描述信息的影响以及在交流中追求准确性的重要性。错误描述最常发生的一个领域是学术写作。学生们通常很难清晰地表达自己的想法，在这样做时，他们可能会错误描述概念或理论。例如，一个关于科学理论的学生可能会不正确地总结其原则，从而导致读者误解所呈现的基本思想。这不仅影响学生的成绩，还助长了学术界内错误信息的传播。因此，学生必须花时间进行彻底研究，确保准确地代表他们所讨论的信息。同样，在新闻领域，风险甚至更高。记者有责任准确报道事实，因为他们的工作塑造公众的认知和观点。如果记者错误描述了某个事件或误引了某个人的话，可能会导致公众愤怒或错误信息。例如，如果一篇新闻文章错误描述了政治人物的声明，可能会不公平地玷污他们的声誉或对公共话语产生负面影响。因此，记者必须遵循道德标准，并认真核实他们的工作，以避免错误描述信息。此外，在日常对话中，我们也可能在不知情的情况下错误描述情况。当叙述一个故事时，如果我们没有准确回忆细节，可能会无意中改变叙述的含义。例如，如果某人告诉朋友他们看过的一部电影，但错误描述了情节或角色，可能会导致混淆或对电影缺乏兴趣。这突显了我们沟通时保持警惕的重要性，因为即使是小的错误也可能导致更大的误解。为了对抗错误描述的倾向，个人应该培养促进谨慎沟通的习惯。首先，在分享信息之前花时间核实事实可以防止错误描述。无论是在学术写作中检查来源，还是在新闻报道中确认引用，勤奋都是关键。此外，寻求同伴的反馈可以帮助在信息发布或分享之前识别潜在的不准确性。与他人进行讨论也可以澄清我们的理解，防止我们错误描述概念。总之，错误描述信息可能产生深远的影响，从学术环境到新闻报道，再到日常对话。作为交流者，我们必须努力追求准确性和清晰度，以确保我们的信息按预期被理解。通过在研究、事实核查和寻求反馈方面保持勤奋，我们可以最小化错误描述信息的风险，为一个更有信息的社会做出贡献。最终，目标是有效沟通，促进理解和联系，而不是混淆和错误信息。