tenable

简明释义

英[ˈtenəb(ə)l]美[ˈtenəb(ə)l]

adj. （主张等）站得住脚的；可维持的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The concept of legal truth is a false one that is not tenable, and the proposition of the theory of legal.

“法律真实”则是个似是而非的概念，“法律真实说”关于真实标准的主张也是多余的。

2.None of these arguments are tenable .

这些论点没有一个是站得住脚的。

3.What reason would the establishment give, that would be a tenable excuse?

那权势集团会给出什么样的站得住脚的理由呢？

4.As there is nothing mystical or theological about Confucianism, such a view is, indeed, quite tenable.

因为儒教没有什么神秘或神学色彩，这样的一种看法的确是站得住脚的。

5.Your theory is not tenable at all.

你的理论一点也不能成立。

6.The only way his role can be clarified and his position made tenable again is if there's a public inquiry.

弄清他扮演的角色并再次证明他的合理立场的唯一办法是展开公开调查。

7.The old idea that this work was not suitable for women was no longer tenable.

认为这种工作不适合妇女的旧想法再也站不住脚了。

8.But returning to the way things were is neither realistic nor morally tenable.

但是，让事物回到过去的轨道不仅是不现实的，在道德上也是站不住脚的。

9.Just I think the view which he must come out in this way is not tenable.

只是我觉得他这样得出来的观点是站不住脚的。

10.The committee found that the proposal was tenable and decided to move forward with it.

委员会发现该提案是可行的，并决定继续推进。

11.The company's business model is not tenable in the current market environment.

该公司的商业模式在当前市场环境下并不可行。

12.In the debate, he presented a tenable position on climate change that impressed the audience.

在辩论中，他提出了一个关于气候变化的合理的立场，给观众留下了深刻印象。

13.Her argument was tenable and supported by solid evidence.

她的论点是有根据的，并且有坚实的证据支持。

14.The professor argued that her theory was still tenable despite recent criticisms.

教授辩称她的理论尽管最近受到批评，但仍然是可维持的。

作文

In the realm of academic discourse, the concept of a tenable argument is crucial for effective communication and persuasion. A tenable position is one that can be defended with logical reasoning and evidence, making it a cornerstone of any scholarly debate. When students engage in discussions or write essays, they must ensure that their viewpoints are not only clear but also tenable. This means that they should provide substantial support for their claims, drawing from credible sources and sound reasoning.For instance, consider a debate on climate change. One might argue that human activity is significantly contributing to global warming. To make this argument tenable, one would need to present data from scientific studies, statistics on carbon emissions, and expert opinions from climatologists. Without this supporting evidence, the argument could easily be dismissed as unfounded or biased. Therefore, the tenability of an argument directly correlates with the strength of its supporting evidence.Moreover, the importance of having a tenable stance extends beyond academia into everyday life. In professional settings, individuals often need to advocate for ideas, projects, or policies. A proposal that is tenable is more likely to gain approval and support from colleagues and stakeholders. For example, when pitching a new marketing strategy, it is essential to back up claims with market research, potential ROI, and case studies of similar successful initiatives. This not only demonstrates credibility but also builds trust among team members.However, achieving a tenable position can sometimes be challenging. It requires critical thinking and the ability to anticipate counterarguments. A well-rounded argument acknowledges opposing views and addresses them effectively. This is particularly important in contentious topics where emotions may run high. By presenting a tenable argument that considers multiple perspectives, one can foster constructive dialogue and promote understanding.Furthermore, the notion of tenability is not static; it can evolve over time. New evidence may emerge that challenges previously accepted ideas, rendering them less tenable. For example, scientific advancements can lead to shifts in understanding regarding health recommendations or environmental policies. Thus, it is vital for individuals, especially those in research and policy-making, to remain adaptable and open to revising their positions based on new information.In conclusion, the ability to construct a tenable argument is essential in both academic and professional contexts. It relies on thorough research, critical thinking, and the willingness to engage with differing viewpoints. As we navigate complex issues in our lives and careers, striving for tenable positions will not only enhance our credibility but also contribute to more meaningful and productive discussions. Ultimately, being able to articulate and defend a tenable stance is a skill that can lead to greater success and influence in various spheres of life.

在学术话语的领域中，tenable（可辩护的）论点的概念对于有效的沟通和说服至关重要。tenable（可辩护的）立场是可以通过逻辑推理和证据进行辩护的立场，这是任何学术辩论的基石。当学生参与讨论或写作时，他们必须确保自己的观点不仅清晰，而且是tenable（可辩护的）。这意味着他们应该为自己的主张提供实质性的支持，引用可信的来源和合理的推理。例如，考虑关于气候变化的辩论。有人可能会争辩说，人类活动正在显著导致全球变暖。为了使这个论点tenable（可辩护的），就需要提供科学研究的数据、碳排放的统计数据以及气候学家的专家意见。如果没有这些支持性证据，这个论点很容易被驳回为毫无根据或偏见。因此，论点的tenability（可辩护性）与其支持证据的强度直接相关。此外，拥有一个tenable（可辩护的）立场的重要性不仅限于学术界，它延伸到日常生活中。在职业环境中，个人经常需要为想法、项目或政策进行辩护。一个tenable（可辩护的）提案更有可能获得同事和利益相关者的批准和支持。例如，在推销一项新的营销策略时，必须用市场研究、潜在的投资回报率和类似成功案例的研究来支持主张。这不仅展示了可信度，还建立了团队成员之间的信任。然而，实现一个tenable（可辩护的）立场有时可能是具有挑战性的。这需要批判性思维和预见反对论点的能力。一个全面的论点承认对立观点并有效地解决它们。这在情感可能高涨的争议话题中特别重要。通过呈现一个考虑多种观点的tenable（可辩护的）论点，可以促进建设性的对话并促进理解。此外，tenability（可辩护性）的概念并不是静态的；它可以随着时间的推移而演变。新证据可能出现，挑战先前接受的观点，使其变得不那么tenable（可辩护的）。例如，科学进展可能导致关于健康建议或环境政策的理解发生变化。因此，对于个人，尤其是在研究和政策制定中的个人来说，保持适应性和开放性，以便根据新信息修订自己的立场是至关重要的。总之，构建一个tenable（可辩护的）论点的能力在学术和职业背景中都是至关重要的。它依赖于彻底的研究、批判性思维以及与不同观点互动的意愿。当我们在生活和职业中应对复杂问题时，努力追求tenable（可辩护的）立场不仅会增强我们的可信度，还有助于更有意义和富有成效的讨论。最终，能够清晰表达和捍卫一个tenable（可辩护的）立场是一项可以在生活的各个领域带来更大成功和影响力的技能。