indict
简明释义
v. 控告,起诉,告发
第 三 人 称 单 数 i n d i c t s
现 在 分 词 i n d i c t i n g
过 去 式 i n d i c t e d
过 去 分 词 i n d i c t e d
英英释义
在法庭上正式指控某人犯罪。 | |
To charge someone with a serious crime, often leading to a trial. | 指控某人犯有严重罪行,通常会导致审判。 |
单词用法
起诉嫌疑人 | |
对公众人物的起诉 | |
联邦起诉 | |
刑事起诉 | |
起诉程序 |
同义词
指控 | 检察官决定指控嫌疑人盗窃。 | ||
控告 | 警方准备以攻击罪对他提起控告。 | ||
使负罪 | 证据似乎进一步使他负罪。 | ||
起诉 | They plan to prosecute the company for environmental violations. | 他们计划对该公司进行环保违规起诉。 |
反义词
免除责任 | 证据足够强大,以免除嫌疑人的责任。 | ||
赦免 | 法院决定对他所有的指控予以赦免。 |
例句
1.The equipment suppliers always inquire, suspect and indict to assert their lawful behalf.
承制单位往往采取提出询问、质疑与投诉的方式,维护自身合法权益。
2.The jury indict all eleven men named by the FBI.
陪审团对受到联邦调查局点名的十一个人一并提起公诉。
3.Above results indict that the rat sleep deprivation model was established.
说明睡眠剥夺模型建立成功。
4.The grand jury indicts or refuses to indict accused persons.
大陪审团可起诉或拒绝起诉被告。
5.The US is believed to be considering how to indict Assange over the the huge leak.
美国被认为是考虑如何在庞大的起诉阿桑格泄漏。
6.In the absence of sufficient proof, the police could not indict him.
没有足够的证据,警方不能起诉他。
7.I mean I put two years of work - nine months of it undercover - to gather enough evidence to indict Dante Arete. The case was almost made.
我的意思是我用了两年时间收集足以起诉丹蒂·阿雷特的证据,其中9个月是做卧底。
8.Their decisions on whether to indict someone have mostly been unappealable.
他们是否起诉犯罪嫌疑人的决定大部分情况下都是不可上诉的。
9.The prosecutor plans to indict several members of the organization.
检察官计划对该组织的几名成员起诉。
10.After a lengthy investigation, they finally decided to indict the CEO.
经过长时间的调查,他们最终决定对首席执行官起诉。
11.He was indicted on charges of fraud and embezzlement.
他因欺诈和挪用公款而被起诉。
12.The evidence was strong enough to indict him on multiple charges.
证据足够强大,可以对他进行多项起诉。
13.The grand jury decided to indict the suspect for robbery.
大陪审团决定对嫌疑人进行起诉,指控他抢劫。
作文
The legal system plays a crucial role in maintaining order and justice in society. One of the key processes within this system is the ability to indict individuals who are suspected of committing crimes. To indict (控告) someone means to formally charge them with a crime, which is typically done by a grand jury or a prosecutor. This process is essential as it ensures that there is sufficient evidence to proceed with a trial. Without the ability to indict, many individuals who pose a threat to society could go unpunished, leading to a breakdown of law and order.In many cases, the decision to indict is not taken lightly. Prosecutors must carefully review the evidence presented to them and determine whether it meets the legal standards required for an indictment. This involves assessing witness testimonies, physical evidence, and any other relevant information. The gravity of the situation cannot be underestimated, as an indictment can have lasting consequences on the lives of those involved. For the accused, being indicted can lead to severe social stigma and impact their future opportunities, even if they are ultimately found not guilty.Moreover, the process of indicting someone serves as a safeguard against wrongful accusations. It requires substantial proof before an individual can be formally charged, thereby protecting innocent people from being dragged into the legal system without just cause. This aspect of the legal framework is vital for ensuring that justice is served fairly and equitably.However, the process of indictment is not without its criticisms. Some argue that the system can be biased, particularly against marginalized communities. There are instances where certain groups are disproportionately indicted, raising questions about racial and socioeconomic inequalities within the judicial system. This has led to calls for reform, emphasizing the need for a more balanced approach to prosecution and indictment.In conclusion, the ability to indict individuals is a fundamental aspect of the legal system that upholds justice and accountability. While it serves to protect society from criminal behavior, it also requires careful consideration and oversight to ensure fairness. As society continues to evolve, so too must our understanding of the implications of indictment and the importance of safeguarding the rights of all individuals within the legal framework. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a justice system that is both effective in prosecuting crime and equitable in its treatment of all citizens.
法律系统在维护社会秩序和正义方面发挥着至关重要的作用。这个系统中的一个关键过程是能够对被怀疑犯罪的个人进行控告。对某人进行控告(indict)意味着正式指控他们犯有罪行,这通常由大陪审团或检察官进行。这个过程是必不可少的,因为它确保有足够的证据来进行审判。如果没有能够控告的能力,许多对社会构成威胁的个人可能会逍遥法外,从而导致法律和秩序的崩溃。在许多情况下,决定是否控告并不是轻而易举的事情。检察官必须仔细审查呈现给他们的证据,并确定其是否符合起诉所需的法律标准。这涉及评估证人证词、实物证据以及任何其他相关信息。情况的严重性不容小觑,因为一项控告可能对相关人员的生活产生持久的影响。对于被控者来说,被控告可能会导致严重的社会污名,并影响他们未来的机会,即使他们最终被判无罪。此外,控告某人的过程作为防止错误指控的保障。它要求在正式指控之前提供实质性证据,从而保护无辜的人不会在没有正当理由的情况下被卷入法律系统。法律框架的这一方面对于确保公正和公平地实现正义至关重要。然而,控告的过程并非没有批评。有些人认为,该系统可能存在偏见,特别是针对边缘化社区。有实例表明,某些群体被不成比例地控告,引发了关于司法系统中种族和社会经济不平等的问题。这导致了改革的呼声,强调需要对起诉和控告采取更平衡的方法。总之,能够控告个人是法律系统的基本方面,维护正义和问责制。尽管它旨在保护社会免受犯罪行为的侵害,但也需要谨慎考虑和监督,以确保公平。随着社会的不断发展,我们对控告的影响及其在法律框架内保护所有个人权利的重要性的理解也必须不断演变。最终,目标应该是创建一个既能有效起诉犯罪又能公平对待所有公民的司法系统。