monologic

简明释义

英[ˌmɒnəʊˈlɒdʒɪk]美[ˌmɑnəˈlɑdʒɪk]

adj. 独白的；独白式的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.An utterance, in spite of its monologic surface structure, generally has a more complicated dialogic and argumentative deep structure of multiple voices.

表层结构以独白形式出现的话语的深层结构往往是复杂的多声对话和论辩结构。

2.An utterance, in spite of its monologic surface structure, generally has a more complicated dialogic and argumentative deep structure of multiple voices.

表层结构以独白形式出现的话语的深层结构往往是复杂的多声对话和论辩结构。

3.The teacher's lecture was so monologic that it left no room for student interaction.

老师的讲座是如此单向的，以至于没有留给学生互动的空间。

4.In a monologic discussion, one person dominates the conversation without considering others' viewpoints.

在单向的讨论中，一个人主导了对话，而不考虑其他人的观点。

5.Critics argued that the author's monologic approach limited the complexity of the characters.

评论家们认为作者的单向方法限制了角色的复杂性。

6.A monologic perspective can often lead to misunderstandings in communication.

一种单向的视角往往会导致沟通中的误解。

7.The film's narrative style felt monologic, focusing solely on the protagonist's thoughts.

这部电影的叙事风格感觉单向，仅专注于主角的想法。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, communication plays a crucial role in our daily lives. However, not all forms of communication are equally effective or engaging. One such form is what we refer to as monologic (单向的), which describes a style of communication where one party dominates the conversation without allowing for meaningful interaction from others. This type of communication can often lead to misunderstandings and a lack of connection between individuals. To illustrate the concept of monologic (单向的) communication, consider a lecture setting. In an academic environment, a professor may deliver a lecture for an hour, presenting information to students without inviting questions or discussions. While this method can effectively convey knowledge, it often lacks the engagement that comes from a more interactive approach. Students may feel disconnected or overwhelmed by the information presented, and their ability to process and retain the material may diminish. On the other hand, effective communication thrives on dialogue, which is characterized by mutual exchange and participation. In contrast to monologic (单向的) communication, dialogue encourages listeners to engage, ask questions, and share their perspectives. This back-and-forth exchange fosters a deeper understanding of the subject matter and creates a more inclusive atmosphere. The impact of monologic (单向的) communication extends beyond academic settings. In personal relationships, when one partner consistently dominates conversations, the other may feel undervalued or ignored. This imbalance can lead to frustration and resentment, ultimately harming the relationship. Healthy communication requires both parties to listen actively and respond thoughtfully, creating a space where each person feels heard and respected. In the workplace, monologic (单向的) communication can stifle creativity and innovation. When leaders fail to encourage input from team members, they miss out on valuable insights and ideas. A collaborative environment, where everyone has the opportunity to contribute, can lead to more effective problem-solving and decision-making. By recognizing the limitations of monologic (单向的) communication, organizations can foster a culture of openness and inclusivity. Moreover, the rise of digital communication platforms has also influenced how we interact with one another. Social media, for instance, can sometimes promote monologic (单向的) exchanges, where individuals broadcast their thoughts without seeking feedback or engaging in conversation. While these platforms provide a means to share information, they can also create an echo chamber effect, where diverse opinions and perspectives are drowned out by dominant voices. To combat the prevalence of monologic (单向的) communication, it is essential to cultivate active listening skills. This involves being present in the moment, acknowledging others' contributions, and responding in a way that encourages further discussion. By doing so, we can transform our interactions from one-sided dialogues into rich, meaningful conversations that benefit all parties involved. In conclusion, while monologic (单向的) communication may serve specific purposes, it is vital to recognize its limitations. Embracing dialogue and fostering an environment of mutual respect can enhance our relationships, improve our understanding of complex issues, and ultimately lead to more fruitful interactions. As we navigate our increasingly interconnected world, let us strive to communicate in ways that honor the voices of all individuals, moving away from monologic (单向的) exchanges towards a more inclusive and engaging discourse.

在当今快节奏的世界中，沟通在我们的日常生活中起着至关重要的作用。然而，并非所有形式的沟通都是同样有效或引人入胜的。其中一种形式就是我们所称的monologic（单向的），它描述了一种沟通风格，其中一方主导对话，而不允许其他人进行有意义的互动。这种沟通方式往往会导致误解和个人之间缺乏联系。 为了说明monologic（单向的）沟通的概念，考虑一下讲座场合。在学术环境中，教授可能会进行一个小时的讲座，将信息传达给学生，而不邀请提问或讨论。虽然这种方法可以有效地传达知识，但它通常缺乏来自更互动方式的参与感。学生可能会感到脱节或被信息淹没，他们处理和记忆材料的能力可能会降低。 另一方面，有效的沟通依赖于对话，这种对话以相互交流和参与为特征。与monologic（单向的）沟通相反，对话鼓励听众参与、提问并分享他们的观点。这种互动的交流促进了对主题的更深刻理解，并创造了一个更具包容性的氛围。 monologic（单向的）沟通的影响超出了学术环境。在个人关系中，当一方持续主导谈话时，另一方可能会感到被低估或忽视。这种失衡可能导致沮丧和怨恨，最终损害关系。健康的沟通要求双方积极倾听并认真回应，创造一个每个人都感到被倾听和尊重的空间。 在工作场所，monologic（单向的）沟通可能会抑制创造力和创新。当领导者未能鼓励团队成员的意见时，他们错过了宝贵的见解和想法。一个合作的环境，让每个人都有机会贡献，可以导致更有效的问题解决和决策。通过认识到monologic（单向的）沟通的局限性，组织可以培养开放和包容的文化。 此外，数字沟通平台的兴起也影响了我们之间的互动。例如，社交媒体有时会促进monologic（单向的）交流，个人在没有寻求反馈或参与对话的情况下广播他们的想法。虽然这些平台提供了分享信息的手段，但它们也可能造成回音室效应，导致多样的意见和观点被主导声音淹没。 为了解决monologic（单向的）沟通的普遍性，培养积极倾听的技能至关重要。这涉及到专注于当下，承认他人的贡献，并以鼓励进一步讨论的方式回应。通过这样做，我们可以将我们的互动从单向对话转变为丰富而有意义的对话，惠及所有参与者。 总之，尽管monologic（单向的）沟通可能服务于特定目的，但认识到其局限性是至关重要的。拥抱对话并营造相互尊重的环境可以增强我们的关系，提高我们对复杂问题的理解，并最终导致更富有成效的互动。当我们在日益互联的世界中导航时，让我们努力以尊重所有个体声音的方式进行沟通，远离monologic（单向的）交流，走向更具包容性和参与性的讨论。