wiretap

简明释义

英[ˈwaɪətæp]美[ˈwaɪərtæp]

n. 窃听；窃听装置

vi. （搭线）窃听

vt. 搭线窃听；窃听或偷录

adj. 窃听的；窃听得到的

复 数 w i r e t a p s

第 三 人 称 单 数 w i r e t a p s

现 在 分 词 w i r e t a p p i n g

过 去 式 w i r e t a p p e d

过 去 分 词 w i r e t a p p e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.She felt violated when she learned her phone had been wiretapped without her consent.

当她得知自己的电话未经同意被窃听时，感到受到侵犯。

2.During the investigation, they discovered that the wiretap had captured several incriminating conversations.

在调查过程中，他们发现窃听捕捉到了几段令人信服的谈话。

3.The FBI decided to use a wiretap to gather evidence against the suspected criminal.

联邦调查局决定使用窃听来收集针对涉嫌犯罪者的证据。

4.The defense attorney argued that the wiretap evidence was obtained illegally.

辩护律师辩称窃听证据是非法获得的。

5.The government has strict regulations regarding the use of wiretaps in criminal investigations.

政府对在刑事调查中使用窃听有严格的规定。

作文

In the age of advanced technology, the term wiretap has become increasingly relevant. A wiretap refers to the practice of monitoring telephone and electronic communications. This method has been used by law enforcement agencies around the world to gather evidence against suspected criminals. However, the use of wiretap raises significant ethical and legal questions regarding privacy and civil liberties.Historically, wiretapping was conducted through physical means, where agents would literally intercept telephone lines to listen in on conversations. This often required a considerable amount of time and resources, not to mention the legal hurdles that needed to be overcome to obtain warrants. In the modern era, however, wiretap techniques have evolved with technology. Digital communications can now be intercepted more easily, allowing for broader surveillance capabilities.The implications of wiretap extend beyond just criminal investigations. For instance, governments may use wiretap techniques to monitor potential threats to national security. While this can be justified in certain circumstances, it also opens the door to potential abuse of power. Citizens may find themselves under surveillance without their knowledge, raising concerns about the violation of their rights and freedoms.Moreover, the legality of wiretap practices varies by country and jurisdiction. In some places, strict regulations are in place to protect individuals from unwarranted surveillance. In others, the laws may be more lenient, allowing for easier access to wiretap capabilities by authorities. This disparity can lead to confusion and mistrust among the public, as people may feel vulnerable to being monitored without just cause.The debate surrounding wiretap practices often centers on the balance between security and privacy. Advocates for increased surveillance argue that it is necessary to combat crime and terrorism effectively. They believe that the benefits of wiretap outweigh the potential risks to individual privacy. On the other hand, civil liberties groups contend that such practices infringe upon fundamental rights and can lead to a slippery slope of increased government control over personal lives.In recent years, high-profile cases involving wiretap have brought these issues to the forefront of public discourse. Revelations about government surveillance programs have sparked outrage and calls for reform. Many citizens are now more aware of the extent to which their communications can be monitored, leading to a demand for greater transparency and accountability from authorities.In conclusion, the concept of wiretap represents a complex intersection of technology, law, and ethics. As we continue to navigate the digital age, it is crucial to engage in discussions about the implications of wiretap practices on our society. Striking a balance between ensuring safety and protecting individual rights will be an ongoing challenge. Ultimately, as technology advances, so too must our understanding and regulation of practices like wiretap, ensuring that they serve the public good without compromising our freedoms.

在先进技术的时代，术语窃听变得越来越相关。窃听是指监控电话和电子通信的做法。这种方法已被世界各地的执法机构用来收集对涉嫌犯罪者的证据。然而，窃听的使用引发了关于隐私和公民自由的重要伦理和法律问题。历史上，窃听是通过物理手段进行的，特工们会实际拦截电话线路以监听谈话。这通常需要相当多的时间和资源，更不用说需要克服的法律障碍，以获得搜查令。然而，在现代时代，窃听技术随着技术的发展而演变。数字通信现在可以更轻松地被拦截，从而允许更广泛的监视能力。窃听的影响不仅限于刑事调查。例如，政府可能会利用窃听技术来监控潜在的国家安全威胁。虽然在某些情况下，这可以被合理化，但它也为权力滥用打开了大门。公民可能发现自己在不知情的情况下受到监视，这引发了对其权利和自由被侵犯的担忧。此外，窃听实践的合法性因国家和管辖区而异。在某些地方，有严格的规定来保护个人免受不必要的监视。在其他地方，法律可能更宽松，允许当局更容易地获得窃听能力。这种差异可能导致公众的困惑和不信任，因为人们可能会感到自己在没有正当理由的情况下受到监视。围绕窃听实践的辩论通常围绕安全与隐私之间的平衡展开。支持加强监视的人认为，这是有效打击犯罪和恐怖主义所必需的。他们认为，窃听的好处超过了对个人隐私的潜在风险。另一方面，公民自由团体则主张，这种做法侵犯了基本权利，并可能导致政府对个人生活的控制不断增加。近年来，涉及窃听的高调案件将这些问题推到了公众讨论的前沿。有关政府监视计划的揭露引发了愤怒和改革的呼声。许多公民现在更加意识到他们的通信可能被监控的程度，导致对当局要求更大透明度和问责制的需求。总之，窃听的概念代表了技术、法律和伦理之间复杂的交集。随着我们继续在数字时代航行，进行关于窃听实践对我们社会影响的讨论至关重要。在确保安全和保护个人权利之间取得平衡将是一个持续的挑战。最终，随着技术的进步，我们对像窃听这样的做法的理解和监管也必须与时俱进，确保它们服务于公共利益，而不妨碍我们的自由。