inconsistencies

简明释义

英[ɪnkənˈsɪstənsiːz]美[ˌɪnkənˈsɪstənsiz]

矛盾

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.This reduces the inconsistencies between different browsers and is the best way to improve performance.

这降低了不同浏览器之间的差别，是改善性能的最佳方法。

2.Viewing the report, you can spot any inconsistencies on the password policy between different users.

可以通过查看报告发现不同用户的密码策略之间不一致的地方。

3.There are plenty of inconsistencies and a lack of polish, which puts Apple ahead in this area.

其网站上面还充斥了大量不一致的内容，也缺少精心的打磨，因此在这一点上苹果胜出”。

4.Because of the reliance on the underlying native focus system, numerous platform "inconsistencies" appeared.

由于对底层的本地焦点系统的依赖性，因而出现了许多平台不相容的现象。

5.There were several inconsistencies and ambiguities in her speech.

她的发言有几处前后不一致和含混不清。

6.As just described, inconsistencies can surface at a metadata level, as well as at the data level itself.

正如我们所描述的，不一致可能会出现在元数据级别，也可能会在数据级别本身出现。

7.Contradictions and inconsistencies are givens, too.

反驳和矛盾同样也是给予。

8.Her story was full of inconsistencies, which made it hard to believe.

她的故事充满了不一致性，这使得人们很难相信。

9.The report highlighted several inconsistencies in the data collection process.

报告强调了数据收集过程中的几个不一致性。

10.There are inconsistencies in how the rules are applied across different teams.

不同团队在规则应用方面存在不一致性。

11.The audit revealed inconsistencies in the financial statements.

审计揭示了财务报表中的不一致性。

12.We need to address the inconsistencies in our marketing strategy.

我们需要解决市场营销策略中的不一致性。

作文

In any complex system, whether it be a scientific theory, a legal framework, or even a social structure, one often encounters inconsistencies. These inconsistencies can arise from various sources, including flawed reasoning, miscommunication, or simply the evolution of understanding over time. For instance, consider the field of science. Scientific theories are continuously tested and refined based on new evidence. However, during this process, researchers may discover inconsistencies in their data or between different studies. Such inconsistencies can lead to confusion and debate, as scientists strive to reconcile these differences and arrive at a more accurate understanding of the natural world.Similarly, in the realm of law, inconsistencies can have significant implications. Legal systems are built upon precedents and statutes that must be interpreted consistently. Yet, judges may arrive at different conclusions based on the same set of facts, leading to inconsistencies in legal rulings. These discrepancies can undermine public trust in the legal system, as individuals may feel that justice is not being applied fairly. It is crucial for legal scholars and practitioners to identify and address these inconsistencies to uphold the integrity of the law.On a societal level, inconsistencies can manifest in various ways, particularly in cultural norms and values. As societies evolve, certain beliefs may clash with others, resulting in inconsistencies in how individuals perceive right and wrong. For example, a society might advocate for equality while simultaneously allowing discriminatory practices to persist. These inconsistencies can create tension and conflict within communities, prompting discussions about ethics, morality, and the need for change.Addressing inconsistencies requires a willingness to engage in critical thinking and open dialogue. In science, researchers must be willing to question their assumptions and share their findings transparently, even when those findings reveal inconsistencies. In law, legal professionals must work collaboratively to analyze cases and ensure that justice is served uniformly. And in society, individuals must be open to examining their beliefs and recognizing when they may hold inconsistencies that need to be reconciled.In conclusion, inconsistencies are an inherent part of complex systems, reflecting the challenges of human understanding and communication. Whether in science, law, or social contexts, recognizing and addressing inconsistencies is essential for progress and cohesion. By fostering an environment where inconsistencies can be discussed openly, we pave the way for deeper insights, improved systems, and ultimately, a more just and equitable society.

在任何复杂的系统中，无论是科学理论、法律框架，还是社会结构，人们常常会遇到不一致。这些不一致可能来自多种来源，包括推理错误、沟通失误，或仅仅是理解随着时间的推移而演变。例如，考虑科学领域。科学理论不断根据新证据进行测试和完善。然而，在这一过程中，研究人员可能会发现他们的数据或不同研究之间存在不一致。这样的不一致可能导致混淆和争论，因为科学家努力调和这些差异，以便更准确地理解自然世界。同样，在法律领域，不一致可能具有重大影响。法律系统建立在必须一致解释的先例和法规之上。然而，法官可能基于相同的事实得出不同的结论，导致法律裁决中的不一致。这些差异可能削弱公众对法律系统的信任，因为个人可能觉得正义没有得到公平的适用。法律学者和从业者必须识别并解决这些不一致，以维护法律的完整性。在社会层面，不一致可以以各种方式表现出来，特别是在文化规范和价值观方面。随着社会的发展，某些信念可能与其他信念发生冲突，从而导致个人在如何看待对与错时出现不一致。例如，一个社会可能倡导平等，同时又允许歧视性做法的存在。这些不一致可能在社区内造成紧张和冲突，促使人们讨论伦理、道德及变革的必要性。解决不一致需要愿意参与批判性思维和开放对话。在科学中，研究人员必须愿意质疑自己的假设，并透明地分享他们的发现，即使这些发现揭示了不一致。在法律中，法律专业人士必须合作分析案件，以确保公正得到一致适用。而在社会中，个人必须愿意审视自己的信念，并认识到何时他们可能持有需要调和的不一致。总之，不一致是复杂系统固有的一部分，反映了人类理解和沟通的挑战。无论是在科学、法律还是社会背景中，识别和解决不一致对于进步和凝聚力至关重要。通过促进一个可以公开讨论不一致的环境，我们为更深入的洞察、改进的系统铺平了道路，最终实现一个更公正和公平的社会。