plutocratic

简明释义

英[/pluːtəˈkrætɪk/]美[/pluˈtɑːkrætɪk/]

adj. 富豪的；财阀的；有钱有势的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.She seems caught in a loveless marriage with a rather cold and distant plutocratic husband.

她似乎陷入了爱情与婚姻，而寒冷和遥远的富豪丈夫。

2.She seems caught in a loveless marriage with a rather cold and distant plutocratic husband.

她似乎陷入了爱情与婚姻，而寒冷和遥远的富豪丈夫。

3.Many believe that we are living in a plutocratic 富豪统治的 age where the rich get richer.

许多人相信我们生活在一个富豪统治的时代，富人越来越富。

4.The plutocratic 富豪统治的 influences on policy-making are becoming more transparent.

对政策制定的富豪统治的影响变得更加透明。

5.The plutocratic 富豪统治的 elite influence major decisions in the government.

这些富豪统治的精英影响政府中的重大决策。

6.In a plutocratic 富豪统治的 society, wealth often dictates political power.

在一个富豪统治的社会中，财富往往决定政治权力。

7.Critics argue that the plutocratic 富豪统治的 system undermines democracy.

批评者认为，富豪统治的体系削弱了民主。

作文

In recent years, the term plutocratic has gained significant attention in discussions about wealth and power dynamics in society. A plutocratic system is one where the wealthy elite hold substantial influence over political and economic decisions, often at the expense of the broader population. This phenomenon can be observed in various countries around the world, where the gap between the rich and the poor continues to widen. The implications of a plutocratic society are profound, affecting not only governance but also social cohesion and economic stability.The rise of plutocratic influences can be traced back to the increasing concentration of wealth among a small percentage of individuals. According to recent studies, the top 1% of earners in many developed nations have accumulated wealth that surpasses that of the entire middle class combined. This disparity creates a plutocratic environment where the voices of the affluent overshadow those of average citizens. Consequently, policies are often crafted to benefit the wealthy, perpetuating a cycle of inequality.For instance, tax reforms frequently favor the rich, allowing them to retain more of their income while placing a heavier burden on lower-income households. This trend not only exacerbates economic disparities but also undermines the democratic process, as plutocratic interests lobby for legislation that serves their needs rather than the public good. The result is a political landscape where the principles of democracy are compromised by the overwhelming power of wealth.Moreover, the impact of a plutocratic society extends beyond economics and politics; it also permeates cultural and social spheres. With vast financial resources, the wealthy can shape public opinion through media ownership and funding of cultural initiatives. This control over narratives can lead to a skewed perception of reality, where the struggles of the average citizen are minimized or ignored. In such a scenario, the societal fabric begins to fray, as trust in institutions erodes and divisions deepen.To combat the rise of plutocratic tendencies, it is essential for citizens to remain vigilant and engaged in the democratic process. Advocacy for policies that promote equity, such as progressive taxation and campaign finance reform, can help mitigate the influence of wealth on politics. Additionally, fostering a culture of civic engagement encourages individuals to voice their concerns and participate in decision-making processes. By doing so, society can work towards dismantling the structures that allow plutocratic interests to thrive.In conclusion, the concept of plutocratic governance poses significant challenges to the ideals of democracy and social justice. As wealth continues to concentrate in the hands of a few, it is imperative for individuals and communities to recognize the dangers of a plutocratic society. Through collective action and advocacy for equitable policies, we can strive to create a more inclusive and fair society, where the voices of all citizens are heard and valued. Only then can we hope to counteract the detrimental effects of plutocratic influence and foster a healthier democratic environment.

近年来，术语plutocratic在关于社会财富与权力动态的讨论中引起了显著关注。plutocratic制度是指富裕精英在政治和经济决策中拥有实质性影响力，往往以牺牲更广泛人群的利益为代价。这一现象可以在世界各国观察到，富人与穷人之间的差距不断扩大。plutocratic社会的影响深远，不仅影响治理，还影响社会凝聚力和经济稳定。plutocratic影响的上升可以追溯到财富集中在少数个人手中的趋势。根据最近的研究，许多发达国家的头1%收入者所积累的财富超过了整个中产阶级的财富总和。这种差距创造了一个plutocratic环境，在这里，富人的声音淹没了普通公民的声音。因此，政策往往是为了惠及富人而制定，从而延续了不平等的循环。例如，税收改革通常有利于富人，使他们能够保留更多的收入，同时对低收入家庭施加更重的负担。这一趋势不仅加剧了经济差距，还削弱了民主进程，因为plutocratic利益游说立法，以服务于他们的需求，而不是公共利益。结果是，政治格局因财富的压倒性力量而受到损害。此外，plutocratic社会的影响不仅限于经济和政治，它还渗透到文化和社会领域。凭借巨额财力，富人可以通过媒体所有权和文化倡议的资助来塑造公众舆论。这种对叙事的控制可能导致现实的扭曲看法，普通公民的挣扎被最小化或忽视。在这种情况下，社会结构开始破裂，因为对机构的信任侵蚀，分歧加深。为了对抗plutocratic倾向的上升，公民必须保持警惕并参与民主进程。倡导促进公平的政策，如累进税制和竞选融资改革，可以帮助减轻财富对政治的影响。此外，培养公民参与的文化鼓励个人表达他们的关切并参与决策过程。通过这样做，社会可以努力拆除允许plutocratic利益繁荣的结构。总之，plutocratic治理的概念对民主和社会正义的理想构成了重大挑战。随着财富继续集中在少数人手中，个人和社区必须认识到plutocratic社会的危险。通过集体行动和对公平政策的倡导，我们可以努力创造一个更具包容性和公平的社会，在这里，所有公民的声音都被听到和重视。只有这样，我们才能希望抵消plutocratic影响的有害效果，促进一个更健康的民主环境。