militarizing

简明释义

英[ˌmɪlɪtəraɪzɪŋ]美[ˌmɪlɪtəraɪzɪŋ]

vt. 军事化，军国主义化（militarize 的现在分词）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.I'm not interested in militarizing the border.

我没兴趣武装边境。

2.The existence of large quantities of private weapons worsened the problems of banditry and violence in Guangdong, militarizing local society.

民间武器的大量存在使广东的盗匪问题更加严重，使地方社会进一步武力化。

3.The existence of large quantities of private weapons worsened the problems of banditry and violence in Guangdong, militarizing local society.

民间武器的大量存在使广东的盗匪问题更加严重，使地方社会进一步武力化。

4.Critics argue that militarizing 军事化 education can lead to a culture of violence.

批评者认为，教育的军事化可能导致暴力文化的形成。

5.The militarizing 军事化 of technology has changed the landscape of modern warfare.

技术的军事化改变了现代战争的格局。

6.Many countries are militarizing 军事化 their borders in response to rising tensions.

许多国家正在对其边界进行军事化以应对日益紧张的局势。

7.The government is accused of militarizing 军事化 the police force to suppress dissent.

政府被指控将警察部队进行军事化以压制异议。

8.The militarizing 军事化 of civilian spaces has raised concerns about civil liberties.

民用空间的军事化引发了对公民自由的担忧。

作文

In recent years, the term militarizing has gained significant attention in discussions surrounding national security and international relations. The process of militarizing refers to the act of equipping or preparing a country or organization for military action. This can include increasing military spending, enhancing defense capabilities, and fostering a culture that prioritizes military solutions over diplomatic ones. As nations face various threats, both real and perceived, the tendency to militarize can become more pronounced, raising questions about the implications for global peace and stability.One of the most prominent examples of militarizing is seen in the context of the arms race among world powers. Countries often feel compelled to enhance their military capabilities in response to perceived threats from rival nations. For instance, the ongoing tensions between the United States and Russia have led both countries to invest heavily in modernizing their nuclear arsenals. This militarizing of their respective forces not only escalates the potential for conflict but also diverts resources away from essential social programs such as healthcare and education.Moreover, the militarizing of law enforcement agencies has become a troubling trend in many countries. In the United States, for example, the use of military-grade equipment by local police forces has sparked intense debate about the appropriateness of such measures in civilian contexts. Critics argue that this militarizing of police can lead to an increase in violence and a breakdown of trust between law enforcement and communities. The images of heavily armed officers confronting peaceful protesters during civil unrest serve as stark reminders of the pitfalls associated with militarizing domestic security forces.The implications of militarizing extend beyond the immediate effects on security and public safety. It can also influence international relations, as nations that adopt aggressive military postures may provoke similar responses from others. This cycle of militarizing and counter-militarizing can create an environment ripe for conflict, undermining efforts toward diplomacy and cooperation. For example, the South China Sea dispute has seen several countries militarizing their claims through the construction of military bases and increased naval presence, heightening tensions in the region.While some argue that militarizing is necessary for national defense, it is crucial to consider the long-term consequences of such actions. A focus on military solutions can overshadow the importance of dialogue and negotiation in resolving conflicts. Furthermore, the resources allocated towards militarizing could be better spent on initiatives that address the root causes of conflict, such as poverty, inequality, and lack of access to education.In conclusion, the trend of militarizing across various domains raises significant concerns about its impact on society and international relations. As nations navigate complex security challenges, it is essential to strike a balance between defense and diplomacy. By recognizing the dangers associated with an overemphasis on militarizing, we can work towards a more peaceful and cooperative world, where dialogue prevails over aggression and understanding triumphs over fear.

近年来，‘militarizing’这个词在国家安全和国际关系的讨论中引起了广泛关注。‘militarizing’的过程是指为国家或组织准备军事行动的行为。这可能包括增加军事开支、增强防御能力以及培养优先考虑军事解决方案而非外交手段的文化。随着国家面临各种威胁，无论是真实的还是感知的，‘militarizing’的倾向可能会更加明显，引发关于全球和平与稳定的影响的问题。‘militarizing’的一个显著例子是在世界大国之间的军备竞赛中。各国常常感到有必要提升其军事能力，以应对来自竞争对手国家的威胁。例如，美国与俄罗斯之间持续的紧张局势促使两国在现代化核武库上投入巨资。这种‘militarizing’各自力量的做法不仅加剧了冲突的潜力，还将资源从医疗和教育等重要社会项目中转移出去。此外，许多国家执法机构的‘militarizing’已成为一个令人担忧的趋势。例如，在美国，当地警察部队使用军用装备引发了关于这种措施在民用环境中适当性的激烈辩论。批评者认为，这种警察的‘militarizing’可能导致暴力增加，并破坏执法部门与社区之间的信任。在公民骚乱期间，重装武装的警察与和平抗议者对峙的画面，生动地提醒我们与‘militarizing’国内安全部队相关的陷阱。‘militarizing’的影响超出了对安全和公共安全的直接影响。它还可能影响国际关系，因为采取激进军事姿态的国家可能会激起其他国家的类似反应。这种‘militarizing’与反‘militarizing’的循环可能创造出一个易于冲突的环境，从而削弱外交与合作的努力。例如，南海争端中，多个国家通过建设军事基地和增加海军存在来‘militarizing’其主权声索，加剧了该地区的紧张局势。虽然一些人认为‘militarizing’对国家防御是必要的，但必须考虑这种行为的长期后果。过于关注军事解决方案可能会掩盖对话和谈判在解决冲突中的重要性。此外，分配给‘militarizing’的资源可以更好地用于解决冲突根源的倡议，比如贫困、不平等和缺乏教育机会。总之，各个领域的‘militarizing’趋势引发了对其对社会和国际关系影响的重大担忧。当各国应对复杂的安全挑战时，至关重要的是在防御和外交之间找到平衡。通过认识到过度强调‘militarizing’的危险，我们可以朝着一个更加和平与合作的世界努力，在那里对话胜过侵略，理解战胜恐惧。