smatter

简明释义

英[ˈsmætə(r)]美[ˈsmætər]

v. 略知，稍懂；涉猎；东拉西扯

n. 一知半解

第 三 人 称 单 数 s m a t t e r s

现 在 分 词 s m a t t e r i n g

过 去 式 s m a t t e r e d

过 去 分 词 s m a t t e r e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.As is. To be humble, encounter things that do not understand to ask others, cannot smatter.

为是。要谦虚，遇到不懂的事情要请教别人，不能不懂装懂。

2.And it's human natural too that parents want their children to be healthier and smatter then other people's.

拥有后代是人类的本性，让自己的孩子比别人的孩子更健康更聪明也是人类的本性。

3.ABSTRACT: It is obvious that every one of you must have learned something about French wine regions and grape varieties, though smatter it could be.

摘要：对于法国这样一个葡萄酒行业的霸主，大家应该都对其产区和葡萄品种等有一定的了解，但这种了解可能并不十分完善。

4.ABSTRACT: It is obvious that every one of you must have learned something about French wine regions and grape varieties, though smatter it could be.

摘要：对于法国这样一个葡萄酒行业的霸主，大家应该都对其产区和葡萄品种等有一定的了解，但这种了解可能并不十分完善。

5.The tourist had a smatter of French, which helped him order food at the restaurant.

这位游客懂一点smatter的法语，这帮助他在餐厅点餐。

6.She has a smatter of knowledge about art history, enough to hold a casual conversation.

她对艺术史有一点smatter的知识，足以进行轻松的对话。

7.He only has a smatter of Spanish, which makes it difficult for him to communicate in Mexico.

他只懂一点smatter的西班牙语，这使得他在墨西哥沟通起来很困难。

8.Despite his smatter of coding skills, he managed to build a simple website.

尽管他只有一点smatter的编码技能，他还是成功地建立了一个简单的网站。

9.Her smatter of knowledge about gardening made her popular among her neighbors.

她对园艺的smatter知识使她在邻居中很受欢迎。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, many people pride themselves on being knowledgeable about a wide range of topics. However, there is a fine line between true expertise and merely having a superficial understanding of subjects. This phenomenon can be best described by the word smatter, which means to have a slight or superficial knowledge of something. While it is certainly beneficial to have a broad array of interests, relying only on a smatter of information can lead to misunderstandings and miscommunications.Consider the case of a person who claims to be well-versed in various scientific fields. They might throw around terms like "quantum physics" or "genetic engineering," but if their knowledge is merely a smatter, they could easily misinterpret complex concepts. For instance, they may confuse the principles of genetics with those of evolution, leading to inaccurate conclusions. This is not to say that having a smatter of knowledge is entirely negative; it can spark curiosity and encourage individuals to explore deeper into subjects. However, it is crucial to recognize when our understanding is shallow.Moreover, in conversations, especially in social settings, people often engage in discussions where they exhibit a smatter of knowledge about current events, technology, or cultural trends. They might share opinions or facts that sound convincing but lack depth or accuracy. This can result in spreading misinformation, as others may take these statements at face value without seeking further clarification. In an age where information is readily available, it becomes increasingly important to differentiate between genuine expertise and a mere smatter of knowledge.The impact of having only a smatter of understanding extends beyond individual conversations. In professional environments, for example, team members who possess only a superficial grasp of their roles can hinder progress. Imagine a project manager who has a smatter of knowledge about software development leading a tech team. Their inability to understand technical challenges can lead to unrealistic expectations and project delays. Thus, while it is admirable to have diverse interests, it is essential to strive for depth in at least some areas to avoid the pitfalls of a smatter of knowledge.In conclusion, while having a smatter of knowledge can be advantageous in initiating conversations and exploring new ideas, it is vital to recognize its limitations. Striving for deeper understanding in specific areas not only enhances our personal growth but also improves our interactions with others. The pursuit of knowledge should not just be about collecting facts but about fostering a genuine comprehension that allows for meaningful dialogue and informed decision-making. Ultimately, we should aim to transform any smatter of knowledge into a more substantial foundation that enriches our lives and the lives of those around us.

在当今快节奏的世界中，许多人以对广泛主题的知识而自豪。然而，真正的专业知识和仅仅对某些主题有肤浅了解之间存在着微妙的界限。这种现象可以用单词smatter来描述，意思是对某事物有轻微或肤浅的知识。虽然拥有广泛的兴趣无疑是有益的，但仅依赖于smatter的信息可能会导致误解和沟通不畅。考虑一个声称自己精通多个科学领域的人。他们可能会提到“量子物理”或“基因工程”等术语，但如果他们的知识仅仅是smatter，他们可能会轻易误解复杂的概念。例如，他们可能会将遗传学的原理与进化论混淆，从而得出不准确的结论。这并不是说拥有smatter的知识完全是负面的；它可以激发好奇心，鼓励个人深入探索主题。然而，重要的是要认识到我们的理解何时是肤浅的。此外，在对话中，尤其是在社交场合，人们经常参与讨论，表现出对当前事件、技术或文化趋势的smatter知识。他们可能分享听起来令人信服但缺乏深度或准确性的观点或事实。这可能导致传播错误信息，因为其他人可能会毫无保留地接受这些陈述，而不寻求进一步的澄清。在信息随时可得的时代，区分真正的专业知识和仅仅是smatter的知识变得越来越重要。仅拥有smatter理解的影响超出了个人对话。例如，在专业环境中，拥有肤浅理解的团队成员可能会妨碍进展。想象一下，一个对软件开发只有smatter知识的项目经理领导一个技术团队。他们无法理解技术挑战可能导致不切实际的期望和项目延迟。因此，虽然拥有多样的兴趣令人钦佩，但在某些领域追求深度至关重要，以避免smatter知识的陷阱。总之，虽然拥有smatter知识在启动对话和探索新想法方面可能是有利的，但认识到其局限性至关重要。在特定领域追求更深层次的理解不仅增强了我们的个人成长，也改善了我们与他人的互动。追求知识不应仅仅是收集事实，而应促进一种真正的理解，使我们能够进行有意义的对话和明智的决策。最终，我们应该努力将任何smatter知识转变为更实质性的基础，丰富我们的生活和周围人的生活。