operationism

简明释义

英[ˌɒpəˈreɪʃənɪzəm]美[ˌɒpəˈreɪʃənɪzəm]

操作主义

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The definition of social development under the perspective of operationism must move to the specification of quantity.

在操作主义视域下定义社会发展必须要转向具体的数量。

2.The definition of social development under the perspective of operationism must move to the specification of quantity.

在操作主义视域下定义社会发展必须要转向具体的数量。

3.The principle of operationism 操作主义 is often applied in experimental research designs.

在实验研究设计中，操作主义 operationism 原则常被应用。

4.Critics argue that operationism 操作主义 limits the scope of theoretical understanding.

批评者认为操作主义 operationism 限制了理论理解的范围。

5.In education, operationism 操作主义 can guide teachers to assess student performance through measurable tasks.

在教育中，操作主义 operationism 可以指导教师通过可测量的任务来评估学生表现。

6.The debate over operationism 操作主义 has significant implications for scientific methodology.

关于操作主义 operationism 的辩论对科学方法论有重要影响。

7.In psychology, operationism 操作主义 emphasizes that concepts must be defined in terms of observable operations.

在心理学中，操作主义 operationism 强调概念必须通过可观察的操作来定义。

作文

In the realm of philosophy and science, the term operationism refers to a conceptual framework that emphasizes the importance of observable operations or procedures in defining scientific concepts. This approach was notably championed by the psychologist Percy Bridgman in the early 20th century. Bridgman argued that many scientific terms are often ambiguous and can lead to confusion if not grounded in specific, measurable operations. Thus, he proposed that a concept should only be considered scientifically valid if it can be defined in terms of the operations used to measure it. This idea has profound implications for various fields, including psychology, sociology, and even economics.One of the key advantages of operationism is its insistence on clarity and precision. By requiring that concepts be tied to observable and repeatable operations, scientists are encouraged to develop rigorous methodologies that can be consistently applied. For instance, when studying intelligence, an operationist approach would define intelligence through specific tests and measurements rather than vague descriptors. This method not only enhances the reliability of research findings but also facilitates communication among scientists and practitioners. When everyone agrees on the operational definitions, discussions become more productive, and collaborative efforts are streamlined.However, operationism is not without its critics. Some argue that it can be overly restrictive and may exclude important theoretical constructs that cannot easily be measured. For example, concepts such as love, creativity, or social justice are notoriously difficult to quantify through operations alone. Critics contend that by focusing solely on what can be measured, operationism risks ignoring the rich, qualitative aspects of human experience that are essential for a comprehensive understanding of complex phenomena. This tension between quantitative and qualitative approaches remains a significant point of debate within the social sciences.Moreover, the reliance on operational definitions can sometimes lead to a form of reductionism, where complex concepts are oversimplified to fit measurement criteria. For example, in psychological research, operationalizing constructs like mental health into quantifiable metrics may overlook the nuances of individual experiences and cultural contexts. As a result, while operationism promotes scientific rigor, it also poses challenges in capturing the full spectrum of human behavior and social interactions.In educational settings, operationism can play a critical role in curriculum design and assessment. Educators who adopt this framework may focus on developing clear learning objectives that are tied to observable student behaviors and outcomes. By doing so, they create a structured environment where students understand what is expected of them and how their progress will be measured. This clarity can enhance student motivation and engagement, as learners are more likely to succeed when they have well-defined goals.In conclusion, operationism serves as a valuable philosophical approach that encourages precision and clarity in scientific inquiry. While it offers numerous benefits, such as enhanced communication and methodological rigor, it also faces criticism for potentially oversimplifying complex concepts. Balancing the operational definitions with an appreciation for qualitative insights is essential for a holistic understanding of the phenomena we study. As we continue to navigate the complexities of human behavior and social systems, integrating both operational and theoretical perspectives will be crucial in advancing our knowledge and fostering meaningful dialogue across disciplines.

在哲学和科学领域，术语operationism指的是一种概念框架，强调在定义科学概念时可观察的操作或程序的重要性。这种方法在20世纪初由心理学家珀西·布里奇曼（Percy Bridgman）特别倡导。布里奇曼认为，许多科学术语往往模糊不清，如果没有具体、可测量的操作作为基础，就会导致混淆。因此，他提出，只有在可以通过用于测量的操作来定义的情况下，才能认为一个概念在科学上是有效的。这个观点对心理学、社会学甚至经济学等多个领域产生了深远的影响。operationism的一个关键优点是它对清晰度和精确性的坚持。通过要求将概念与可观察和可重复的操作联系起来，科学家们被鼓励开发可以一致应用的严格方法。例如，在研究智力时，采用操作主义的方法将通过特定的测试和测量来定义智力，而不是模糊的描述。这种方法不仅提高了研究结果的可靠性，还促进了科学家和从业者之间的沟通。当每个人都同意操作定义时，讨论变得更加富有成效，合作努力也更为顺畅。然而，operationism并非没有批评者。一些人认为，它可能过于限制，可能排除那些无法轻易测量的重要理论构建。例如，爱情、创造力或社会正义等概念因其难以量化而著称。批评者认为，专注于可测量的内容可能会忽视人类经验中丰富的定性方面，这对于全面理解复杂现象至关重要。这种定量与定性方法之间的紧张关系仍然是社会科学领域内的重要辩论点。此外，依赖操作定义有时可能导致一种还原主义，即将复杂概念简化到适合测量标准的程度。例如，在心理学研究中，将心理健康等构建操作化为可量化的指标可能会忽视个体经历和文化背景的细微差别。因此，尽管operationism促进了科学的严谨性，但它也面临着捕捉人类行为和社会互动全谱的挑战。在教育环境中，operationism可以在课程设计和评估中发挥关键作用。采用这一框架的教育工作者可能会专注于制定与可观察的学生行为和结果相关的明确学习目标。通过这样做，他们创造了一个结构化的环境，让学生理解他们的期望以及如何衡量他们的进步。这种清晰度可以增强学生的动机和参与感，因为当学习者拥有明确的目标时，更有可能取得成功。总之，operationism作为一种有价值的哲学方法，鼓励在科学探究中追求精确和清晰。尽管它提供了许多好处，例如增强沟通和方法论的严谨性，但也面临着可能过于简化复杂概念的批评。在研究我们所研究现象的整体理解时，平衡操作定义和对定性见解的欣赏至关重要。随着我们继续探索人类行为和社会系统的复杂性，将操作和理论视角相结合，对于推进我们的知识和促进跨学科的有意义对话将是至关重要的。