tyrant

简明释义

英[ˈtaɪrənt]美[ˈtaɪrənt]

n. 暴君

复 数 t y r a n t s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Sin is a harsh tyrant in your life. But Christ not only died for our sins, he died to sin.

罪是你生命中的一个残酷暴君。但是基督不仅为我们的罪舍命，而且他向罪而死。

2."Geppetto looks like a good man," added another, "but with boys he's a real tyrant."

“杰佩托看上去是个好人，”另一个补充说，“但对孩子们来说，他真是个暴君。”

3.A safer strategy is to lie low and stay out of the way of the tyrant boss.

有一个安全的策略是低姿态，离暴君老板远点。

4.For even a tyrant will occasionally rule in my favor.

因为即使是暴君也可能偶尔获得我的支持。

5.We will never again allow a tyrant to lead.

我们将不再允许暴君存在。

6.He ran a sword through the tyrant.

他用刀刺穿暴君。

7.Activists worked tirelessly to overthrow the tyrant and restore democracy.

活动家们不懈努力，试图推翻暴君，恢复民主。

8.The king was known as a tyrant, ruling with an iron fist and instilling fear among his subjects.

这位国王被称为暴君，以铁腕统治，给他的臣民带来恐惧。

9.Many people fled the country to escape the tyrant who oppressed their freedoms.

许多人逃离这个国家，以逃避压迫他们自由的暴君。

10.In history, a tyrant often faced rebellion from those who desired liberty.

在历史上，暴君常常面临渴望自由的人的反叛。

11.The novel depicts a society ruled by a tyrant who controls every aspect of life.

这部小说描绘了一个由暴君统治的社会，他控制着生活的每一个方面。

作文

Throughout history, the concept of a tyrant has been a recurring theme in the narratives of many civilizations. A tyrant is often defined as a ruler who wields absolute power in a cruel and oppressive manner. The term carries with it connotations of injustice and despotism, evoking images of leaders who prioritize their own interests over the well-being of their subjects. This essay will explore the characteristics of a tyrant, the historical examples of such rulers, and the impact of tyranny on society.A true tyrant typically exhibits several key traits. First and foremost, they are often characterized by their authoritarian approach to governance. They may use fear and intimidation to maintain control, suppressing dissent and limiting freedoms that are essential for a healthy society. For instance, a tyrant may impose strict censorship laws, preventing citizens from expressing their thoughts or opinions freely. This leads to a culture of silence and oppression, where people are afraid to speak out against the regime.Historically, many figures have been labeled as tyrants. One of the most infamous examples is Adolf Hitler, whose regime was marked by extreme brutality and a complete disregard for human rights. Under his rule, millions suffered and died as a result of his oppressive policies and genocidal actions. Similarly, Joseph Stalin is another figure often associated with tyranny; his leadership in the Soviet Union was characterized by widespread purges, forced labor camps, and a climate of fear that silenced any opposition.The impact of a tyrant on society can be profound and long-lasting. When a leader prioritizes their power over the welfare of their people, entire nations can suffer. Economic decline, social unrest, and a loss of trust in governmental institutions are common outcomes of tyranny. Citizens often find themselves living in a state of fear, which can lead to apathy and disengagement from political processes. This cycle can perpetuate itself, as new leaders may rise to power using similar tactics, leading to a pattern of oppression that becomes ingrained in the fabric of society.In contrast, societies that reject tyranny and embrace democratic principles tend to thrive. Democratic governance allows for the representation of diverse voices and opinions, fostering an environment where individuals can contribute to the decision-making process. History has shown that when people unite against a tyrant, they can bring about significant change. The fall of regimes like that of Saddam Hussein in Iraq and Muammar Gaddafi in Libya serves as a testament to the resilience of the human spirit and the desire for freedom.In conclusion, the term tyrant embodies the essence of oppressive rule that disregards the rights and dignity of individuals. The characteristics of a tyrant—authoritarianism, cruelty, and suppression of dissent—are detrimental to society and can lead to widespread suffering. By understanding the nature of tyranny and its historical implications, we can better appreciate the value of democracy and the importance of safeguarding our freedoms. It is crucial for current and future generations to remain vigilant against the rise of tyrants, ensuring that the lessons of the past are not forgotten and that the fight for justice and equality continues.

纵观历史，暴君这一概念在许多文明的叙事中反复出现。暴君通常被定义为以残酷和压迫的方式行使绝对权力的统治者。这个词带有不公正和专制的含义，唤起了那些将自身利益置于其臣民福祉之上的领导者的形象。本文将探讨暴君的特征、历史上此类统治者的例子以及暴政对社会的影响。真正的暴君通常表现出几个关键特征。首先，他们往往以威权主义的方式进行治理。他们可能利用恐惧和威胁来维持控制，压制异议，限制对健康社会至关重要的自由。例如，暴君可能会实施严格的审查法律，阻止公民自由表达他们的思想或意见。这导致了一种沉默和压迫的文化，人们害怕对政权发声。历史上，许多人物被贴上暴君的标签。其中一个最臭名昭著的例子是阿道夫·希特勒，他的统治以极端的残忍和对人权的完全无视而闻名。在他的统治下，数百万人因其压迫政策和种族灭绝行为而遭受苦难和死亡。同样，约瑟夫·斯大林也是一个常与暴政联系在一起的人物；他在苏联的领导以广泛的清洗、强迫劳动营和一种恐惧气候为特征，压制任何反对意见。暴君对社会的影响可能是深远和持久的。当一位领导者将权力置于人民福祉之上时，整个国家可能会遭受苦难。经济衰退、社会动荡和对政府机构的信任丧失是暴政的常见后果。公民往往发现自己生活在恐惧之中，这可能导致冷漠和对政治过程的脱离。这种循环可能自我延续，因为新的领导者可能会以类似的策略上台，导致一种压迫模式根深蒂固于社会结构中。相比之下，拒绝暴政并拥抱民主原则的社会往往会繁荣。民主治理允许多元声音和观点的代表，培养个人能够参与决策过程的环境。历史表明，当人们团结起来反对暴君时，他们可以带来重大变化。萨达姆·侯赛因在伊拉克和穆阿迈尔·卡扎菲在利比亚的政权垮台就是人类精神韧性和对自由渴望的证明。总之，暴君一词体现了无视个人权利和尊严的压迫统治的本质。暴君的特征——威权主义、残酷和压制异议——对社会是有害的，可能导致广泛的痛苦。通过理解暴政的性质及其历史影响，我们可以更好地欣赏民主的价值和保护我们自由的重要性。当前和未来的世代必须对暴君的崛起保持警惕，确保过去的教训不会被遗忘，正义和平等的斗争继续进行。