teleology

简明释义

英[ˌtiːliˈɒlədʒi]美[ˌtiːliˈɑːlədʒi]

n. 目的论

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.What room does teleology leave for freedom?

目的论给自由留下了空间吗？

2.Atahis isn't only the Confucianism but also the nuclear connotation of the Chinese archaic finery aesthetics teleology.

这不仅是孔门儒家，也是中国古代服饰美学思想目的论的核心内涵。

3.That order was known from Nature and its teleology.

这个秩序是从自然中和它的目的论中所发现的。

4.By teleology it intended the purposefulness of nature.

我的目的就是描写性格。

5.Even psychologists who applaud his teleology and antireductionist position may not be comfortable with him.

即使赞成他目的论和反简化论点的心理学家也未必对他心服。

6.Teleology has four features as subject, subjectivity, objectivity and creativity.

哲学目的观具有主体性、主观性、客观性和创造性四个特征。

7.She invokes Mayan teleology , saying we are in a dark period before sunrise.

门楚援引玛雅神学目的论中的话说，“我们正处在黎明前的黑夜”。

8.It's the production of modern industry society, a kind of culture form whose culture production is made and disseminated by advanced teleology and media.

认为它是近代工业社会条件下的产物，是大众消费社会中通过先进科技媒介手段制造并传递其文化产品的文化形态。

9.In philosophy, the concept of teleology 目的论 is often debated in relation to the existence of purpose in nature.

在哲学中，目的论 目的论的概念常常与自然中存在的目的进行辩论。

10.Critics argue that teleology 目的论 oversimplifies complex systems by attributing a single purpose to them.

批评者认为，目的论 目的论通过将单一目的归因于复杂系统，简化了复杂性。

11.The study of teleology 目的论 raises important questions about human existence and our role in the universe.

对目的论 目的论的研究提出了关于人类存在及我们在宇宙中角色的重要问题。

12.In biology, teleology 目的论 can be seen in the way organisms adapt to their environments.

在生物学中，目的论 目的论可以在生物体如何适应其环境中看到。

13.Aristotle's views on teleology 目的论 suggest that everything has a purpose or end goal.

亚里士多德关于目的论 目的论的观点认为，所有事物都有一个目的或最终目标。

作文

The concept of teleology has fascinated philosophers and scientists for centuries. At its core, teleology refers to the explanation of phenomena by the purpose they serve rather than by postulated causes. This idea raises profound questions about the nature of existence and the motivations behind actions in both the natural world and human behavior. For instance, when we observe a bird building a nest, we might ask ourselves why it engages in this activity. From a strictly mechanistic viewpoint, one could argue that the bird is simply following instinctual behaviors driven by evolutionary pressures. However, from a teleological perspective, we might consider that the bird builds a nest to ensure the survival of its offspring, thus attributing a purpose to its actions.In the realm of ethics, teleology plays a significant role in moral philosophy. Utilitarianism, for example, is a form of teleological ethics that evaluates the morality of an action based on its outcomes. According to this view, an action is deemed right if it promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest number. This approach contrasts sharply with deontological ethics, which focuses on adherence to rules or duties rather than consequences. The teleological framework encourages individuals to consider the broader implications of their actions, fostering a sense of responsibility toward others and the environment.Moreover, teleology is not limited to philosophical discussions; it also permeates scientific inquiry. In biology, for instance, the study of evolution often invokes teleological language when discussing the adaptations of organisms. We might say that certain traits evolved because they serve a specific function, such as camouflage for survival or bright colors for attracting mates. While some scientists argue that such language can be misleading—implying intentionality where there is none—others defend its utility in explaining complex biological processes. This debate highlights the tension between teleology and a purely mechanistic understanding of life.Critics of teleology often point out that attributing purpose to natural phenomena can lead to anthropomorphism, where human traits are ascribed to non-human entities. This can obscure the reality of how nature operates, as it suggests that all actions are goal-directed. Nevertheless, proponents argue that recognizing teleological dimensions can enrich our understanding of both nature and humanity. By acknowledging the purposes behind actions, we can foster a deeper appreciation for the interconnectedness of life and the importance of goals in shaping behavior.In conclusion, teleology serves as a vital lens through which we can examine the world around us. Whether in philosophy, ethics, or science, understanding the purposes behind actions enriches our comprehension of existence. While it is essential to balance teleological explanations with mechanistic ones, acknowledging the role of purpose can lead to more meaningful insights into both human and natural behavior. As we continue to explore the complexities of life, teleology will undoubtedly remain a key concept in our quest for understanding.

“目的论”这一概念几个世纪以来吸引着哲学家和科学家的关注。它的核心是，目的论指的是通过现象所服务的目的而不是假定的原因来解释现象。这一思想引发了关于存在的本质和自然界及人类行为背后动机的深刻问题。例如，当我们观察一只鸟在筑巢时，我们可能会问自己为什么它要进行这一活动。从严格的机械主义观点来看，人们可以说这只鸟只是遵循由进化压力驱动的本能行为。然而，从目的论的角度来看，我们可能会考虑这只鸟筑巢是为了确保其后代的生存，从而将目的归于它的行为。在伦理学领域，目的论在道德哲学中起着重要作用。例如，功利主义是一种目的论伦理学，它根据结果来评估行为的道德性。根据这种观点，一项行动如果促进了最多人的最大幸福，就被认为是正确的。这种方法与义务论伦理学形成鲜明对比，后者更注重遵循规则或义务，而不是后果。目的论框架鼓励个人考虑自己行为的更广泛影响，从而培养对他人和环境的责任感。此外，目的论不仅限于哲学讨论，它也渗透到科学探究中。例如，在生物学中，进化研究经常使用目的论语言来讨论生物体的适应性。我们可能会说某些特征是因为它们服务于特定功能而进化而来的，例如生存的伪装或吸引配偶的鲜艳颜色。虽然一些科学家认为这种语言可能会产生误导——暗示存在意图，而实际上并不存在——但其他人则辩称其在解释复杂生物过程中的实用性。这场辩论突显了目的论与纯粹机械理解生命之间的紧张关系。目的论的批评者常常指出，将目的归于自然现象可能导致拟人化，即将人类特征归于非人类实体。这可能掩盖自然运作的现实，因为它暗示所有行为都是以目标为导向的。然而，支持者认为，认识到目的论维度可以丰富我们对自然和人性的理解。通过承认行为背后的目的，我们可以更深刻地欣赏生命的相互联系以及目标在塑造行为中的重要性。总之，目的论作为一个重要的视角，使我们能够审视周围的世界。无论是在哲学、伦理学还是科学中，理解行为背后的目的都丰富了我们对存在的理解。尽管平衡目的论解释与机械论解释至关重要，但承认目的的作用可以带来更有意义的洞察，无论是对人类行为还是自然行为。随着我们继续探索生命的复杂性，目的论无疑将在我们追求理解的过程中保持关键概念。