censorial

简明释义

英[senˈsɔːrɪəl]美[senˈsɔːriəl]

adj. 监察的，审查的；检查官的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The differential equations of the censorial moving and running relative to censorial of the eccentric vibration seed-metering system were set up with the dynamic analysis method.

利用动力学分析法建立了偏心振动式排种系统质心位移和绕质心转动角位移的微分方程。

2.The differential equations of the censorial moving and running relative to censorial of the eccentric vibration seed-metering system were set up with the dynamic analysis method.

利用动力学分析法建立了偏心振动式排种系统质心位移和绕质心转动角位移的微分方程。

3.The censorial 审查的 board reviewed the content before it could be published.

在内容发布之前，审查的委员会对其进行了审核。

4.His censorial 审查的 comments on the book sparked a debate.

他对这本书的审查的评论引发了一场辩论。

5.The government's censorial 审查的 policies limit freedom of speech.

政府的审查的政策限制了言论自由。

6.Many artists feel pressured by censorial 审查的 forces in their work.

许多艺术家在创作中感受到来自审查的力量的压力。

7.The film was released after several censorial 审查的 edits were made.

这部电影在经过几次审查的编辑后才得以上映。

作文

In today's world, the concept of freedom of speech is often debated, particularly in relation to government and media control. One term that frequently arises in these discussions is censorial, which refers to actions or policies that restrict or suppress information. The censorial nature of certain regimes can be observed in various countries where dissenting voices are silenced and critical perspectives are stifled. This raises significant questions about the role of censorship in society and its impact on democracy and human rights.Censorship has historically been a tool used by those in power to maintain control over the narrative and prevent the dissemination of ideas that could challenge their authority. For instance, during the Cold War, many governments employed censorial measures to limit access to foreign media and suppress internal dissent. This practice not only restricted individual freedoms but also hindered societal progress by inhibiting open discourse and the exchange of ideas.Moreover, the rise of the internet has transformed the landscape of information sharing. While it has provided a platform for diverse voices, it has also led to increased censorial efforts by both state and non-state actors. Social media platforms, for example, often face pressure to regulate content deemed inappropriate or harmful. This raises concerns about who gets to decide what constitutes harmful content and whether such decisions are influenced by censorial motivations.The implications of censorial actions extend beyond mere information suppression; they affect public perception and the ability of individuals to form their own opinions. When information is filtered through a censorial lens, it can create a distorted reality that shapes societal beliefs and behaviors. For instance, if a government consistently downplays negative news about its performance while promoting positive narratives, citizens may develop an unrealistic understanding of their circumstances, leading to disillusionment and distrust in institutions.Furthermore, the censorial approach can stifle creativity and innovation. Artists, writers, and thinkers often rely on the freedom to express their ideas without fear of retribution. When censorial practices are in place, they may self-censor or avoid controversial topics altogether, resulting in a homogenized cultural landscape that lacks diversity and depth. This not only impacts the arts but also scientific inquiry, as researchers may hesitate to pursue certain lines of questioning due to potential backlash.In conclusion, the censorial tendencies present in various forms around the globe pose significant challenges to the ideals of free expression and democratic governance. As citizens, it is crucial to remain vigilant against censorial practices that threaten our rights and freedoms. Advocacy for transparency, open dialogue, and the protection of diverse viewpoints is essential in combating the negative effects of censorship. By fostering an environment where ideas can be freely exchanged, we can work towards a more informed and engaged society, ultimately enhancing our collective understanding and progress.

在当今世界，自由言论的概念常常被辩论，特别是与政府和媒体控制相关的议题。一个在这些讨论中经常出现的术语是censorial，它指的是限制或压制信息的行为或政策。某些政权的censorial特性可以在各种国家中观察到，在这些国家中，异议的声音被压制，批判的观点被扼杀。这引发了关于审查制度在社会中的作用及其对民主和人权影响的重要问题。审查制度历史上一直是权力者用来维持对叙述控制的工具，以防止传播可能挑战其权威的思想。例如，在冷战期间，许多政府采用了censorial措施来限制对外国媒体的访问，并压制内部异议。这种做法不仅限制了个人自由，还通过抑制公开讨论和思想交流阻碍了社会进步。此外，互联网的兴起改变了信息分享的格局。虽然它为多样化的声音提供了平台，但也导致了国家和非国家行为者的censorial努力的增加。例如，社交媒体平台经常面临压力，要求对被认为不适当或有害的内容进行监管。这引发了人们对谁有权决定什么构成有害内容的担忧，以及这些决定是否受到censorial动机的影响。censorial行为的影响超出了简单的信息压制；它们影响公众认知和个人形成自己观点的能力。当信息通过censorial的视角过滤时，可能会创造出一种扭曲的现实，塑造社会信仰和行为。例如，如果一个政府持续淡化有关其表现的负面新闻，同时宣传积极叙事，公民可能会对自己的情况产生不切实际的理解，从而导致幻灭和对机构的不信任。此外，censorial的方法可能会扼杀创造力和创新。艺术家、作家和思想家通常依赖于表达自己思想的自由，而不必担心报复。当存在censorial行为时，他们可能会自我审查或避免争议话题，导致文化景观的同质化，缺乏多样性和深度。这不仅影响艺术，也影响科学研究，因为研究人员可能会因为潜在的反弹而犹豫追求某些研究方向。总之，全球范围内存在的censorial倾向对自由表达和民主治理的理想构成了重大挑战。作为公民，我们必须对威胁我们权利和自由的censorial行为保持警惕。倡导透明度、开放对话和保护多样化观点对于对抗审查制度的负面影响至关重要。通过促进一个思想可以自由交流的环境，我们可以朝着一个更具信息性和参与性的社会迈进，最终增强我们的集体理解和进步。