suppressive

简明释义

[səˈpresɪv][səˈpresɪv]

adj. 镇压的;抑制的

英英释义

Tending to suppress or restrain something, often referring to actions that inhibit or stifle emotions, thoughts, or behaviors.

倾向于抑制或限制某事,通常指抑制或压制情感、思想或行为的行动。

Relating to the act of preventing or inhibiting a process or function.

与阻止或抑制一个过程或功能的行为有关。

单词用法

suppressive measures

压制措施

suppressive therapy

抑制疗法

suppressive effects

抑制效果

suppressive actions against

针对...的压制行动

suppressive regime

压制政权

suppressive laws

压制性法律

同义词

repressive

压制的

The government implemented repressive measures to control dissent.

政府实施了压制性措施以控制异议。

oppressive

压迫的

The oppressive heat made it difficult to work outside.

压迫性的高温使得在外工作变得困难。

subduing

镇压的

The army used subduing tactics to quell the rebellion.

军队使用镇压战术来平息叛乱。

stifling

窒息的

Her stifling criticism left him feeling demoralized.

她窒息般的批评让他感到士气低落。

constrictive

限制性的

The constrictive regulations limited the company's growth.

限制性的法规限制了公司的发展。

反义词

expressive

表现的,表达的

Her expressive art captured the emotions of the audience.

她富有表现力的艺术捕捉了观众的情感。

liberating

解放的,释放的

The liberating movement sought to free individuals from oppressive regimes.

这个解放运动旨在使个人摆脱压迫性的政权。

encouraging

鼓励的,促进的

His encouraging words motivated the team to perform better.

他鼓励的话激励团队表现得更好。

例句

1.Most scholars believe that the use of short-term pot experiment is the best way to verify the disease suppressive ability of composts.

大多数学者认为,采用短期的盆栽试验,是验证堆肥抑病能力最有效的方法。

2.The third approach is to take suppressive antiviral therapy, which not only helps control symptoms, but helps prevent transmission.

第三是采用抗病毒抑制疗法,这种疗法不仅可以帮助控制症状,还有助于防止传播。

3.Objective: To study molecular mechanism of suppressive effect of macrophages from traumatized mice on T cell functions.

摘 要目的:研究创伤后巨噬细胞抑制T细胞功能的分子机制。

4.Objective To learn the abnormal situation of IL-10 with suppressive activity against immune response in lung cancer tissue.

目的了解具有免疫抑制作用的白介素10在肺癌组织中含量异常的情况。

5.The relationship between indices of immune response and the dosage of the immune suppressive was discussed.

本文对兔疫反应与兔疫抑制剂剂量之间的关系进行了讨论。

6.Conclusion Bupleurum Chinense Emulsion has a marked suppressive effects on the inflammation.

结论柴胡静脉乳剂具有抑制炎症反应的作用。

7.A study on the suppressive effect of interferon on the formation of filtering surgical scar was carried out.

对干扰素抑制滤过性手术瘢痕形成的作用进行研究。

8.In some cases, suppressive therapy can prevent the recurrence of infections.

在某些情况下,抑制性治疗可以防止感染的复发。

9.Researchers are studying the suppressive effects of certain drugs on cancer cells.

研究人员正在研究某些药物对癌细胞的抑制性效应。

10.The suppressive nature of the regime led to widespread protests among the citizens.

该政权的抑制性特征导致公民之间广泛抗议。

11.The government implemented suppressive measures to control the spread of misinformation.

政府实施了抑制性措施以控制虚假信息的传播。

12.The doctor prescribed a suppressive medication to help manage the patient's chronic condition.

医生开了一种抑制性药物来帮助管理病人的慢性疾病。

作文

In today's world, the concept of freedom is often juxtaposed against the idea of control. Many societies strive to maintain a balance between individual liberties and the need for order. However, there are instances where governments or organizations resort to methods that can be described as suppressive (压制性的) in nature. These measures can take various forms, including censorship, surveillance, and even violence. The implications of such actions can be profound, affecting not only the immediate victims but also the broader social fabric.One of the most prominent examples of suppressive (压制性的) measures can be found in authoritarian regimes. In these countries, dissent is often met with harsh repercussions. Citizens who dare to voice their opinions or challenge the status quo may find themselves subjected to imprisonment, torture, or worse. This creates a climate of fear, where individuals are discouraged from expressing their thoughts, leading to a stifling of creativity and innovation.Censorship is another form of suppressive (压制性的) action that is prevalent in many parts of the world. Governments may restrict access to information by blocking websites, controlling media narratives, or banning certain books and films. This not only limits the public's access to diverse viewpoints but also undermines the very foundation of democracy, which relies on informed citizenry. The effects of censorship can be far-reaching, as it prevents society from engaging in critical discussions about important issues.Moreover, the use of surveillance technology has become increasingly common in both democratic and authoritarian contexts. While proponents argue that such measures enhance security, they often lead to a suppressive (压制性的) environment where individuals feel constantly monitored. This can inhibit free speech and discourage people from participating in protests or expressing dissenting opinions. The psychological impact of living under surveillance can be debilitating, as citizens may self-censor their thoughts and actions out of fear of retribution.The consequences of suppressive (压制性的) tactics extend beyond the individual level. When a society becomes accustomed to repression, it can lead to a culture of conformity, where critical thinking and debate are discouraged. This stagnation can hinder progress and innovation, ultimately harming the society as a whole. In contrast, societies that embrace open dialogue and diverse perspectives tend to thrive, as they foster an environment where ideas can be freely exchanged and challenged.In conclusion, while the desire for order and stability is understandable, resorting to suppressive (压制性的) measures can have detrimental effects on individuals and society. It is essential for governments and organizations to recognize the value of freedom and the importance of protecting individual rights. By fostering an environment where diverse voices can be heard, societies can promote creativity, innovation, and ultimately, a more just and equitable world. The challenge lies in finding the right balance between maintaining order and allowing for the flourishing of human expression.

在当今世界,自由的概念常常与控制的理念相对立。许多社会努力在个人自由与秩序需求之间保持平衡。然而,有些情况下,政府或组织会诉诸于可以被描述为压制性的suppressive)措施。这些措施可以采取各种形式,包括审查、监视甚至暴力。这些行为的影响可能是深远的,不仅影响直接受害者,还会影响更广泛的社会结构。压制性的suppressive)措施中最显著的例子可以在威权政权中找到。在这些国家,异议往往会遭到严厉的惩罚。敢于表达意见或挑战现状的公民,可能会面临监禁、酷刑或更糟的后果。这种情况创造了一种恐惧气候,使个人不敢表达自己的想法,从而导致创造力和创新的压制。审查是另一种普遍存在于许多地区的压制性的suppressive)行为。政府可能通过封锁网站、控制媒体叙述或禁止某些书籍和电影来限制信息的获取。这不仅限制了公众接触多元观点的机会,而且还破坏了民主的基础,而民主依赖于知情的公民。审查的影响可能是深远的,因为它阻碍了社会就重要问题进行批判性讨论。此外,监视技术的使用在民主和威权背景下变得越来越普遍。虽然支持者辩称这样的措施增强了安全性,但它们往往导致个体生活在一个压制性的suppressive)环境中,个体感到自己时刻被监视。这可能抑制言论自由,并使人们不愿参与抗议或表达异议。生活在监视之下的心理影响可能是压倒性的,因为公民可能会出于对报复的恐惧而自我审查自己的思想和行为。压制性的suppressive)策略的后果超越了个体层面。当一个社会习惯于压制时,它可能导致一种顺从的文化,在这种文化中,批判性思维和辩论受到抑制。这种停滞可能阻碍进步和创新,最终损害整个社会。相比之下,拥抱开放对话和多元观点的社会往往会繁荣,因为它们促进了一个可以自由交流和挑战想法的环境。总之,尽管追求秩序和稳定是可以理解的,但诉诸于压制性的suppressive)措施可能对个体和社会产生有害影响。政府和组织必须认识到自由的价值以及保护个人权利的重要性。通过营造一个可以倾听多元声音的环境,社会可以促进创造力、创新,最终实现一个更加公正和平等的世界。挑战在于找到维护秩序与允许人类表达蓬勃发展的正确平衡。