obstructionism

简明释义

英[əbˈstrʌkʃənɪzəm]美[əbˈstrʌkʃənɪzəm]

n. 蓄意阻挠

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Their obstructionism will outlast King Abdullah's reign.

他们的蓄意阻挠会比阿卜杜拉国王的统治持续得更久。

2.Anyone in the LDP who reflects on how savagely voters might punish the party's obstructionism at the polls should favour this.

选民们曾因为自民党的阻碍行为而在选举中对其进行严厉的惩罚，当任何一位自民党人士回想起这一刻的时候，他们应该都会支持以上的建议。

3.And part of the outcome of this gamble depends on whether voters perceive Republican opposition as a principled stand against pointless spending, or an example of simple obstructionism.

这场赌博的结局还在一定程度上取决于选民究竟是会把共和党的反对看作是坚持原则、和无谓支出做斗争，还是存心在这里搅局。

4.The Republicans are also paying a direct price for their obstructionism—surrendering what influence they might have had over impending legislation (and playing into Ms Pelosi’s hands in the process).

共和党人同时需要为阻挠议事付出直接代价——在迫切需要立法的项目上影响力降低（和在立法过程中受制于Pelosi女士）。

5.Moreover, Mr Obama's toughest opponents are within his own party - a new challenge after years of grappling with reflex Republican obstructionism.

此外，奥巴马最难缠的反对者是在本党内部——在多年疲于应对共和党反射性的否决之后，这是一个新的挑战。

6.The opposition was more silent than outspoken, making its weight felt through parliamentary obstructionism.

相比直言不讳，反对派更加沉默，使得它更像是来自议会的蓄意阻挠。

7.The Republicans are also paying a direct price for their obstructionism—surrendering what influence they might have had over impending legislation (and playing into Ms Pelosi’s hands in the process).

共和党人同时需要为阻挠议事付出直接代价——在迫切需要立法的项目上影响力降低（和在立法过程中受制于Pelosi女士）。

8.Critics see the courts as too often serving as pawns in interest groups' campaigns of delay and obstructionism, sabotaging the coherence of orderly program administration.

批评家们认为，法院在利益集团的拖延和阻碍之争以及在破坏有秩序的项目执行的连贯性中，过于经常地起着抵押品的作用。

9.Critics argue that obstructionism is hindering important legislative reforms.

批评者认为阻挠主义妨碍了重要的立法改革。

10.In times of crisis, obstructionism can have dire consequences for effective governance.

在危机时期，阻挠主义可能对有效治理产生严重后果。

11.The mayor's plan faced obstructionism from community groups opposed to the development.

市长的计划遭到了反对开发的社区团体的阻挠主义。

12.The administration accused the opposition party of engaging in obstructionism to derail their agenda.

政府指责反对党采取阻挠主义来破坏他们的议程。

13.The senator's constant delays in the voting process were seen as a form of obstructionism.

这位参议员在投票过程中不断的拖延被视为一种阻挠主义。

作文

In the realm of politics, the term obstructionism refers to the deliberate act of impeding or delaying legislative processes. It is a strategy often employed by political parties or groups to stall initiatives that they oppose, regardless of the potential benefits these initiatives may bring to the public. The roots of obstructionism can be traced back to the fundamental disagreements that exist within democratic systems, where differing ideologies clash in the pursuit of power and influence.One of the most prominent examples of obstructionism can be seen in the United States Congress. Here, minority parties frequently employ tactics such as filibustering, which allows them to prolong debate on legislation indefinitely. This not only frustrates the majority party’s agenda but also raises questions about the efficiency of governance. Critics argue that such practices undermine the democratic process by prioritizing party loyalty over the needs of constituents. Moreover, obstructionism can have far-reaching consequences beyond mere legislative delays. For instance, when critical issues such as healthcare reform, climate change, or infrastructure development are stalled due to obstructionism, it can hinder progress and exacerbate existing problems. Citizens may feel disillusioned with the political system, believing that their representatives are more focused on partisan battles than on addressing pressing societal challenges.In addition to legislative stalling, obstructionism can manifest in various forms, including the refusal to confirm judicial appointments or to hold hearings on important issues. These actions can create a backlog in the judicial system, affecting the timely delivery of justice. Furthermore, when leaders prioritize obstructionism over collaboration, it fosters an environment of hostility and mistrust, making it increasingly difficult to reach bipartisan agreements.The impact of obstructionism is not limited to the political sphere; it can also affect economic stability. When key legislation that supports economic growth is blocked, it can lead to uncertainty in the markets. Investors may hesitate to commit resources when they perceive a lack of legislative progress, ultimately stunting economic development. This ripple effect underscores the importance of cooperation and compromise in governance.On the other hand, some argue that obstructionism can serve as a necessary check on government power. By resisting certain policies, minority parties may protect the interests of their constituents and ensure that proposed laws undergo thorough scrutiny. This perspective highlights the complexity of obstructionism as a political tool; while it can be detrimental, it can also play a role in maintaining a balance of power.Ultimately, understanding obstructionism requires a nuanced view of its implications in the political landscape. While it can be a mechanism for holding the majority accountable, excessive use of obstructionism can lead to gridlock and frustration among voters. As citizens, it is crucial to advocate for a political culture that values dialogue, compromise, and effective governance, rather than one that is mired in constant obstruction.In conclusion, obstructionism is a multifaceted phenomenon that reflects the challenges inherent in a democratic system. It embodies the tensions between competing interests and the need for collaboration. By fostering a political environment that encourages constructive engagement rather than divisive tactics, we can work towards a more effective and responsive government that truly serves the needs of all its citizens.

在政治领域，术语obstructionism指的是故意妨碍或延迟立法过程的行为。这是一种常被政党或团体用来拖延他们反对的倡议的策略，无论这些倡议可能给公众带来多大的好处。obstructionism的根源可以追溯到民主制度内存在的基本分歧，在权力和影响的追求中，不同意识形态发生冲突。在美国国会，obstructionism的一个显著例子可以看到。在这里，少数党经常使用如冗长辩论（filibustering）等战术，使他们能够无限期延长对立法的辩论。这不仅让多数党的议程感到沮丧，也引发了关于治理效率的问题。批评者认为，这种做法通过优先考虑党派忠诚而非选民的需求，破坏了民主进程。此外，obstructionism可能产生深远的后果，超越单纯的立法延误。例如，当医疗改革、气候变化或基础设施发展等关键问题由于obstructionism而停滞不前时，可能会阻碍进展并加剧现有问题。公民可能会对政治体系感到失望，认为他们的代表更关注党派斗争，而非解决紧迫的社会挑战。除了立法拖延，obstructionism还可以以各种形式表现，包括拒绝确认司法任命或对重要问题进行听证。这些行为可能导致司法系统的积压，影响及时交付正义。此外，当领导人优先考虑obstructionism而非合作时，会营造出一种敌对和不信任的环境，使达成两党协议变得越来越困难。obstructionism的影响不仅限于政治领域；它还可能影响经济稳定。当支持经济增长的关键立法被阻止时，可能导致市场的不确定性。当投资者感知到缺乏立法进展时，他们可能会犹豫投入资源，最终抑制经济发展。这种涟漪效应突显了合作与妥协在治理中的重要性。另一方面，一些人认为obstructionism可以作为对政府权力的必要制衡。通过抵制某些政策，少数党可能保护其选民的利益，并确保提案法律经过充分审查。这种观点突显了obstructionism作为政治工具的复杂性；虽然它可能是有害的，但它也可以在维持权力平衡方面发挥作用。最终，理解obstructionism需要对其在政治格局中的影响有一个细致的看法。虽然它可以作为对多数党的问责机制，但过度使用obstructionism可能导致僵局和选民的沮丧。作为公民，倡导一种重视对话、妥协和有效治理的政治文化至关重要，而不是陷入不断的阻挠之中。总之，obstructionism是一个多面的现象，反映了民主制度固有的挑战。它体现了竞争利益之间的紧张关系以及合作的必要性。通过促进鼓励建设性参与而非分裂战术的政治环境，我们可以朝着一个更有效和响应的政府迈进，真正满足所有公民的需求。