punitory

简明释义

英[ˈpjuːnətərɪ]美[ˈpjʊnətəri]

adj. 惩罚的；刑罚的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The judge's sentence was seen as excessively punitory 惩罚性的, raising questions about fairness in the legal system.

法官的判决被视为过于惩罚性的，引发了关于法律系统公平性的问题。

2.Many critics argue that the new law has punitory 惩罚性的 aspects that disproportionately affect the poor.

许多批评者认为新法律具有惩罚性的方面， disproportionately影响穷人。

3.In an effort to deter future offenses, the school adopted punitory 惩罚性的 policies for bullying.

为了阻止未来的犯罪，学校采取了针对欺凌行为的惩罚性的政策。

4.The punitory 惩罚性的 fines imposed on the corporation were intended to serve as a warning to others.

对该公司的惩罚性的罚款旨在给其他人敲响警钟。

5.The company implemented a punitory 惩罚性的 measure against employees who consistently missed deadlines.

公司对那些持续错过截止日期的员工实施了惩罚性的措施。

作文

In many societies, the concept of justice is often intertwined with the notion of punishment. The legal systems in place are designed to uphold order and deter criminal behavior. However, there are varying philosophies about how punishment should be administered. Some believe in a more rehabilitative approach, while others advocate for a more traditional, punitory (惩罚性的) system that emphasizes retribution. This essay will explore the implications of a punitory (惩罚性的) justice system on society and individuals.A punitory (惩罚性的) approach to justice primarily focuses on inflicting punishment on those who break the law. Proponents argue that this method serves as a deterrent, discouraging individuals from engaging in criminal activities due to fear of severe consequences. They believe that when people witness the punishment of offenders, they are less likely to commit similar acts. For instance, harsh penalties for drug trafficking or violent crimes may lead to a decrease in these offenses, as potential criminals weigh the risks against the rewards.However, critics of a punitory (惩罚性的) justice system contend that it often fails to address the root causes of criminal behavior. Instead of merely punishing individuals, they argue that society should focus on rehabilitation and prevention. Many offenders come from disadvantaged backgrounds and may engage in criminal activities out of necessity rather than malice. A punitory (惩罚性的) approach does little to change their circumstances or provide them with the support they need to reintegrate into society successfully.Moreover, the punitory (惩罚性的) system can lead to overcrowded prisons and increased recidivism rates. When individuals are incarcerated for long periods without access to rehabilitative programs, they often return to society with the same issues that led them to crime in the first place. This cycle of punishment creates a revolving door effect, where offenders are released only to re-offend, leading to further strain on the legal system and public resources.Additionally, the punitory (惩罚性的) nature of certain laws can disproportionately affect marginalized communities. For example, mandatory minimum sentences for non-violent offenses have been criticized for targeting low-income individuals and people of color, resulting in an unjust system that perpetuates inequality. Instead of fostering a sense of community and understanding, a punitory (惩罚性的) approach often breeds resentment and division among different societal groups.In contrast, restorative justice offers an alternative to the punitory (惩罚性的) model. This philosophy emphasizes healing and reconciliation between victims and offenders. By focusing on accountability and making amends, restorative justice seeks to address the harm caused by criminal behavior rather than solely punishing the offender. This approach has shown promising results in reducing recidivism and promoting social cohesion.In conclusion, while a punitory (惩罚性的) justice system may seem effective in deterring crime, it often fails to address the underlying issues that contribute to criminal behavior. By prioritizing punishment over rehabilitation, society risks creating a cycle of crime and incarceration that disproportionately affects vulnerable populations. Moving towards a more restorative approach could lead to healthier communities and a more just society. Ultimately, the goal of any justice system should be to promote safety, healing, and the opportunity for all individuals to lead productive lives.

在许多社会中，正义的概念常常与惩罚的观念交织在一起。现有的法律系统旨在维护秩序并威慑犯罪行为。然而，对于惩罚应如何实施存在着不同的哲学观点。有些人相信更具康复性质的方法，而另一些人则主张更传统的惩罚性（punitory）系统，强调报复。本文将探讨惩罚性（punitory）司法系统对社会和个人的影响。惩罚性（punitory）正义方法主要集中在对违反法律的人施加惩罚。支持者认为，这种方法作为一种威慑，能够阻止个人从事犯罪活动，因为他们害怕严重的后果。他们相信，当人们目睹罪犯受到惩罚时，他们不太可能实施类似的行为。例如，对毒品贩运或暴力犯罪的严厉惩罚可能会导致这些罪行的减少，因为潜在的罪犯在权衡风险与收益时会更加谨慎。然而，批评惩罚性（punitory）司法系统的人认为，它往往未能解决犯罪行为的根本原因。他们认为，社会应该关注康复和预防，而不仅仅是惩罚个人。许多罪犯来自弱势背景，可能出于生存需要而从事犯罪活动，而非恶意。惩罚性（punitory）方法对改变他们的境况或为他们提供重新融入社会所需的支持几乎没有帮助。此外，惩罚性（punitory）系统可能导致监狱过度拥挤和再犯率上升。当个人因长期监禁而无法接受康复项目时，他们往往会以同样的问题回归社会，这些问题促使他们最初犯罪。这种惩罚的循环造成了一个旋转门效应，罪犯被释放后又重新犯罪，从而进一步加重了法律系统和公共资源的负担。此外，某些法律的惩罚性（punitory）性质可能对边缘化社区产生不成比例的影响。例如，针对非暴力犯罪的强制最低刑期因其针对低收入个体和有色人种而受到批评，导致一个不公正的系统，助长了不平等。惩罚性（punitory）方法往往滋生怨恨和社会群体之间的分裂，而不是促进社区的团结和理解。相比之下，恢复性司法提供了对惩罚性（punitory）模式的替代方案。这种理念强调受害者与罪犯之间的愈合与和解。通过关注责任和弥补，恢复性司法试图解决犯罪行为造成的伤害，而不仅仅是惩罚罪犯。这种方法在减少再犯率和促进社会凝聚力方面显示出了良好的前景。总之，尽管惩罚性（punitory）司法系统在威慑犯罪方面似乎有效，但它往往未能解决导致犯罪行为的根本问题。通过优先考虑惩罚而非康复，社会冒着创造一个对弱势群体造成不成比例影响的犯罪与监禁循环的风险。向更具恢复性的方法转变可能会导致更健康的社区和更公正的社会。最终，任何司法系统的目标都应该是促进安全、愈合和所有个人过上富有成效的生活的机会。