regurgitate
简明释义
英[rɪˈɡɜːdʒɪteɪt]美[rɪˈɡɜːrdʒɪteɪt]
vi. 回流;回涌;反胃;反刍
vt. 使回流;使回涌;使反刍
第 三 人 称 单 数 r e g u r g i t a t e s
现 在 分 词 r e g u r g i t a t i n g
过 去 式 r e g u r g i t a t e d
过 去 分 词 r e g u r g i t a t e d
英英释义
将吞下的食物带回嘴里。 | |
To repeat or reproduce information without understanding it. | 在没有理解的情况下重复或再现信息。 |
单词用法
重复知识 | |
反刍食物 | |
复述答案 | |
逐字重复信息 | |
无法复述 | |
反刍的行为 |
同义词
再现 | He tends to reproduce the ideas he hears without understanding them. | 他倾向于再现他听到的想法,而不去理解它们。 | |
重复 | 学生在考试中常常重复老师所说的话。 | ||
回声 | 歌手的声音在空荡荡的大厅里回响。 | ||
呕吐 | 狗吃得太快后呕吐了。 | ||
反刍 | 一些鸟类会为幼鸟反刍食物。 |
反义词
消化 | 身体需要时间来正确消化食物。 | ||
吸收 | 植物吸收阳光以产生能量。 |
例句
1.Room service: A red-knobbed hornbill arrives with breakfast, which he will regurgitate for his roughly three-month-old chick safely inside a nest hole in an Alstonia tree.
一只长有红色盔突的雄犀鸟带着早餐翩然而至。 雄犀鸟将会把食物反刍给它大约3个月大的雏鸟,雏鸟安全地在一棵鸡骨常山属树木的巢穴里。
2.Call it the Law of the Aggregator: If something becomes popular enough, somebody will devotedly regurgitate it.
这便是聚合法则:只要一样东西足够流行,一定会有人专门对其资讯进行整合与再消化。
3.If not, then you may simply appreciate an ability to regurgitate facts.
如果回答是“不”,那么你也仅是在欣赏一种“反刍”事实的能力。
4.Many blogs regurgitate the same information and while its cool to see different viewpoints on the same topic, a lot of blogs end up publishing similar content.
很多博客反刍同样的信息,尽管对于同一信息发表不同的观点很酷,但多数博客最终发表了类似的内容。
5.The lectures will delve into the primary topic for the week but they will not regurgitate the reading assignment.
在授课时将会探讨该周的主要课题,但不会溯及指定阅读的书目。
6.Don't regurgitate the stuff given in the textbook.
不要照背课本中的东西。
7.When no other food is available, they regurgitate the honeydew to feed the colony.
当没有别的食物可供时,它们便反刍出蜜露来喂养群体。
8.Of course, we aren't suggesting that you regurgitate the same language used in the description;
当然,我们并不建议你照搬工作要求中用到的同样的话;
9.In his presentation, he regurgitated 重复 statistics from a recent study without analyzing them.
在他的演讲中,他regurgitated 重复了一些最近研究的统计数据,却没有进行分析。
10.During the exam, he regurgitated 照搬 all the facts he had memorized from the textbook.
在考试期间,他regurgitated 照搬了他从教科书上记住的所有事实。
11.The teacher encouraged students to think critically instead of just regurgitating 机械地重复 information.
老师鼓励学生进行批判性思考,而不是仅仅regurgitating 机械地重复信息。
12.The student seemed to only regurgitate 机械地重复 what the teacher had said without understanding the material.
这名学生似乎只是regurgitate 机械地重复老师所说的内容,而没有理解材料。
13.The chef explained how to prepare the dish, but I felt like he was just regurgitating 照搬 a recipe without any personal touch.
厨师解释了如何准备这道菜,但我觉得他只是regurgitating 照搬一个食谱,没有任何个人风格。
作文
In the realm of education, students often find themselves in a position where they are expected to absorb information and then reproduce it during exams or assignments. This process can sometimes lead to a phenomenon where students merely regurgitate (反刍) facts and figures without truly understanding the underlying concepts. This behavior is particularly evident in subjects that require memorization, such as history or biology. For instance, a student might memorize dates of significant historical events or the names of various biological processes but fail to grasp their significance or interconnections. The act of regurgitating (反刍) information can be detrimental to genuine learning. When students focus solely on rote memorization, they miss out on critical thinking and analytical skills that are essential for their academic growth. Instead of engaging with the material, they become passive recipients of knowledge, which limits their ability to apply what they have learned in real-world situations. Moreover, this tendency to regurgitate (反刍) information can extend beyond the classroom. In everyday conversations, individuals may find themselves repeating facts or opinions they have heard without fully understanding them. This can lead to the spread of misinformation, as people share ideas that they have not critically evaluated. For example, during discussions about current events, someone might confidently state a statistic or quote a news article without having done any research to verify its accuracy. This uncritical sharing of information contributes to a culture where superficial understanding is valued over deep knowledge. To combat the inclination to regurgitate (反刍), educators and learners alike must prioritize comprehension over memorization. Teachers can encourage students to engage with the material through discussions, projects, and problem-solving activities that require them to think critically. By fostering an environment where questions are welcomed and exploration is encouraged, students can develop a deeper understanding of the subject matter. Furthermore, students should be encouraged to take ownership of their learning. This means going beyond simply memorizing information for an exam and instead seeking to understand how different concepts relate to one another. For instance, a biology student might explore how ecological systems function, rather than just memorizing the parts of a cell. This approach not only enhances retention but also allows students to apply their knowledge in practical situations. In conclusion, while the ability to regurgitate (反刍) information may seem like a necessary skill in academic settings, it is crucial to recognize its limitations. True learning involves understanding, analyzing, and applying knowledge rather than merely repeating it. By shifting the focus from rote memorization to meaningful engagement with the material, both educators and students can foster a more enriching educational experience that prepares individuals for the complexities of the world around them.