substantivity
简明释义
英[səbˈstæn.tɪ.vɪ.ti]美[səbˈstæn.tə.vɪ.ti]
n. 直接性;直染性;亲和力
英英释义
具有实质或重要性的质量或状态。 | |
The degree to which a concept or idea is meaningful and can be applied in practical contexts. | 一个概念或想法的意义和在实际情境中应用的程度。 |
单词用法
证据的实质性 | |
研究中的实质性 | |
证明实质性 | |
质疑实质性 |
同义词
反义词
非实质性 | The insubstantiality of the argument made it easy to dismiss. | 这个论点的非实质性使得它很容易被驳回。 | |
短暂性 | The ephemerality of trends makes them hard to follow in the long term. | 趋势的短暂性使得它们在长期内难以跟随。 |
例句
1.The results show that PF dyes possess low substantivity, high fixation, excellent stability and color fastness, wide process compatibility.
结果表明,PF型活性染料直接性小,固色率高,洗涤性能、色浆稳定性和色牢度好,且工艺的适应性和宽容性大。
2.The results show that PF dyes possess low substantivity, high fixation, excellent stability and color fastness, wide process compatibility.
结果表明,PF型活性染料直接性小,固色率高,洗涤性能、色浆稳定性和色牢度好,且工艺的适应性和宽容性大。
3.The lawyer emphasized the substantivity of the evidence presented in court.
律师强调了在法庭上提出的证据的实质性。
4.To ensure substantivity, the project must meet all regulatory requirements.
为了确保项目的实质性,必须满足所有监管要求。
5.The report lacked substantivity, which led to its rejection by the committee.
报告缺乏实质性,导致委员会拒绝了它。
6.The team discussed the substantivity of their proposal before submitting it to management.
团队在向管理层提交提案之前讨论了其实质性。
7.In academic research, the substantivity of findings is crucial for establishing credibility.
在学术研究中,研究结果的实质性对建立可信度至关重要。
作文
In the realm of academic discourse, the concept of substantivity plays a crucial role in determining the depth and relevance of a discussion. Substantivity refers to the quality of being substantial or having meaningful content, which is essential for any scholarly work. Without substantivity, arguments may lack the necessary weight to persuade or inform an audience effectively.When writing an essay, it is imperative to focus on the substantivity of the arguments presented. For instance, consider a topic such as climate change. An essay that merely lists facts without delving into their implications lacks substantivity. Instead, a well-rounded discussion should analyze the causes of climate change, its effects on global ecosystems, and potential solutions. This approach not only enhances the substantivity of the essay but also engages the reader on a deeper level.Moreover, substantivity is not limited to the content alone; it also encompasses the structure of the essay. A coherent organization that logically flows from one point to another contributes to the overall substantivity of the piece. For example, a clear introduction that outlines the main arguments, followed by well-developed body paragraphs, and a concise conclusion reinforces the importance of substantivity in writing.Additionally, the use of credible sources can significantly enhance the substantivity of an essay. Citing research studies, expert opinions, and statistical data provides a solid foundation for arguments, making them more persuasive and trustworthy. In contrast, relying on anecdotal evidence or unverified claims diminishes the substantivity of the work, potentially leading to misinformation.Furthermore, the engagement with counterarguments is another aspect that boosts the substantivity of an essay. Addressing opposing viewpoints demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the topic and allows the writer to strengthen their own position. By acknowledging and refuting counterarguments, the writer showcases the substantivity of their argumentation and enhances the overall credibility of the essay.In conclusion, substantivity is a fundamental principle in academic writing that cannot be overlooked. It involves not only the depth and relevance of content but also the structure, use of credible sources, and engagement with different perspectives. By prioritizing substantivity in our writing, we can create essays that are not only informative but also impactful, contributing meaningfully to scholarly discussions and fostering a deeper understanding of complex issues. As writers, it is our responsibility to ensure that our work embodies substantivity, ultimately enriching the academic community and society as a whole.
在学术话语的领域中,substantivity(实质性)的概念在确定讨论的深度和相关性方面发挥着至关重要的作用。Substantivity指的是具有实质性或有意义内容的质量,这对于任何学术作品都是必不可少的。如果没有substantivity,论点可能缺乏说服力或有效地告知观众的必要分量。在写作文章时,专注于所呈现论点的substantivity至关重要。例如,考虑一个主题如气候变化。一篇仅仅列出事实而不深入探讨其含义的文章缺乏substantivity。相反,一个全面的讨论应该分析气候变化的原因、对全球生态系统的影响以及潜在解决方案。这种方法不仅增强了文章的substantivity,而且还在更深层次上吸引读者。此外,substantivity并不限于内容本身;它还包括文章的结构。一个逻辑清晰、从一个观点流畅过渡到另一个观点的组织方式有助于增强整篇文章的substantivity。例如,清晰的引言概述主要论点,随后是充分发展的主体段落,以及简洁的结论,强化了写作中substantivity的重要性。此外,使用可靠的来源可以显著提升文章的substantivity。引用研究、专家意见和统计数据为论点提供了坚实的基础,使其更具说服力和可信度。相反,依赖轶事证据或未经验证的主张会降低作品的substantivity,可能导致误导信息。此外,与反对观点的互动是提高文章substantivity的另一个方面。处理对立观点展示了对主题的全面理解,并使作者能够加强自己的立场。通过承认和反驳反对论点,作者展示了他们论证的substantivity,并增强了整篇文章的可信度。总之,substantivity是学术写作中的一个基本原则,不能被忽视。它不仅涉及内容的深度和相关性,还包括结构、可靠来源的使用以及与不同观点的互动。通过优先考虑写作中的substantivity,我们可以创作出不仅有信息量而且有影响力的文章,为学术讨论做出有意义的贡献,促进对复杂问题的更深理解。作为作者,我们有责任确保我们的作品体现substantivity,最终丰富学术界和整个社会。