pap

简明释义

[pæp][pæp]

n. 半流质食物;奶头;软食

n. (Pap)人名;(葡、罗、塞、芬、挪、冈)帕普

英英释义

A soft or mushy food, especially one that is easy to digest and often given to infants.

一种柔软或糊状的食物,尤其是容易消化的食物,通常给婴儿食用。

Nonsense or overly sentimental writing or speech.

无意义或过于感伤的写作或演讲。

单词用法

pap smear

子宫颈抹片检查

同义词

pulp

The baby was fed with a mixture of milk and pulp.

宝宝被喂了一种混合了牛奶和浆的食物。

mush

糊状物

He prepared a mush of oats for breakfast.

他为早餐准备了一碗燕麦糊。

slop

稀饭

The dog eagerly lapped up the slop from the bowl.

狗兴奋地舔着碗里的稀饭。

反义词

solid food

固体食物

Children should gradually transition from pap to solid food as they grow.

随着孩子的成长,他们应该逐渐从糊状食物过渡到固体食物。

substantial meal

丰盛的餐点

A substantial meal is necessary for maintaining energy levels throughout the day.

丰盛的餐点对于维持全天的能量水平是必要的。

例句

1.All this clearly has the PAP a bit rattled, if Lee Kuan Yew’s comments are anything to go by.

如果按照我们对李光耀所作评论的理解,那么这一切显然令人民行动党略感慌乱。

2.Look at pap and my mother.

看我爸和我妈。

3.Pulmonary arterial pressure ( PAP ) was measured by right heart catheterization.

采用右心导管法测定肺动脉压;

4.A description of specimen type. Conventional Pap smear, liquid based cytology, or other.

样本描述。按惯例行巴氏涂片,液基细胞学检查或者其他类似检查。

5.John and pearl? Ls he their pap ?

约翰和珀尔?他是他们的爸爸吗?

6.Lord, pap can tell, easy.

天哪,爸爸一眼就能看出来。

7.How can you bear to read such pap!

这样无聊的读物你怎能看得下去!

8.Regardless, voters knew what they were getting from the Workers' Party and how it would differ from the PAP.

无论如何,选民们知道他们从工人党能够获得什么,工人党和人民行动党的区别是什么。

9.Objective To study the diagnosis and pathological manifestations of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP).

目的总结肺泡蛋白沉积症(pap)的病理特征及病理诊断要点。

10.The traditional dish is made from maize and is often served as pap.

这道传统菜肴是用玉米制成的,通常作为糊状食物供应。

11.In some cultures, pap is a staple food.

在一些文化中,糊状食物是一种主食。

12.After the surgery, he could only eat pap for a few days.

手术后,他只能吃几天糊状食物

13.She prepared a bowl of pap for her sick child.

她为生病的孩子准备了一碗糊状食物

14.The baby was fed with a spoonful of pap.

宝宝被喂了一勺糊状食物

作文

In the world of literature, the term pap refers to something that is considered trivial or lacking in substance. It is often used to describe works that are overly sentimental, simplistic, or superficial. This term can be applied to various forms of media, including books, movies, and television shows. The use of pap in this context highlights a common concern among critics and audiences alike: the prevalence of low-quality content that prioritizes entertainment over meaningful storytelling.For instance, many blockbuster films today are criticized for being mere pap, relying heavily on special effects and star power rather than a well-crafted narrative. These films may draw large audiences and generate significant box office revenue, but they often leave viewers feeling unsatisfied due to their lack of depth. Critics argue that such productions contribute to a culture that values spectacle over substance, leading to a decline in the quality of storytelling.Moreover, the rise of streaming services has made it easier for pap to proliferate. With an overwhelming amount of content available, creators may feel pressured to produce material that captures attention quickly, even if it means sacrificing quality. This trend can lead to a flood of forgettable shows and movies that fail to resonate with audiences on a deeper level.On the other hand, there are still many creators who strive to produce works that transcend the label of pap. These individuals focus on crafting stories that are not only entertaining but also thought-provoking and emotionally resonant. They understand that true art often challenges the audience, encouraging them to reflect on complex themes and issues. Such works remind us that storytelling can be a powerful tool for social change and personal growth.In conclusion, while pap may serve as a descriptor for certain types of media, it also invites a broader conversation about the nature of entertainment and its impact on society. As consumers, we have the power to choose what we engage with, and by supporting quality storytelling, we can help elevate the standards of the creative industries. Ultimately, the distinction between pap and meaningful content lies in our willingness to seek out and appreciate works that challenge us, provoke thought, and inspire change.

在文学世界中,术语pap指的是被认为琐碎或缺乏实质的东西。它通常用来描述那些过于感性、简单或肤浅的作品。这个术语可以应用于各种媒体形式,包括书籍、电影和电视节目。在这个背景下使用pap突显了批评家和观众普遍关心的问题:低质量内容的普遍存在,这些内容优先考虑娱乐而非有意义的叙事。例如,许多当今的大片因仅仅依赖特效和明星效应而受到批评,被认为是单纯的pap,而不是精心制作的叙事。这些电影可能吸引大量观众并产生可观的票房收入,但由于缺乏深度,往往让观众感到不满。批评家认为,这种制作方式助长了一种文化,重视视觉效果而非内容的实质,从而导致叙事质量的下降。此外,流媒体服务的兴起使得pap更容易泛滥。随着可用内容的数量激增,创作者可能感到压力,必须快速制作能够迅速吸引注意力的材料,即使这意味着牺牲质量。这一趋势可能导致大量令人遗忘的节目和电影涌现,它们未能在更深层次上与观众产生共鸣。另一方面,仍有许多创作者努力制作超越pap标签的作品。这些人专注于创作不仅娱乐而且引发思考和情感共鸣的故事。他们明白,真正的艺术往往挑战观众,鼓励他们反思复杂的主题和问题。这样的作品提醒我们,讲故事可以成为社会变革和个人成长的强大工具。总之,虽然pap可能作为某些类型媒体的描述词,但它也引发了关于娱乐本质及其对社会影响的更广泛讨论。作为消费者,我们有权选择我们所接触的内容,通过支持高质量的叙事,我们可以帮助提升创意产业的标准。最终,pap与有意义内容之间的区别在于我们是否愿意寻找并欣赏那些挑战我们、引发思考和激励变革的作品。