retraction

简明释义

英[rɪˈtrækʃn]美[rɪˈtrækʃn]

n. 撤回，撤销；收回

复 数 r e t r a c t i o n s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The journal later offered a retraction and an apology, but Wang is still bitter about the experience.

这家期刊随后取消了那篇论文并致歉，但王仍对那场经历耿耿于怀。

2.Instant retraction of messages and attachments even after the message has been read.

即使邮件内容已被阅读，也可即时撤回邮件和附件。

3.Under penalty of arrest, the editor issued following retraction: Half the city council aren't crooks.

在被罚以拘留后，编辑发表了以下声明：市议会里有一半人不是骗子。

4.Mr. Harder demanded that Gawker immediately remove the article and publish a public apology and full retraction.

哈德要求高客传媒立刻撤掉这篇文章，并发表公开道歉信，全面收回自己的陈述。

5.He demanded a full retraction of the allegations against him.

他要求完全收回针对他的言论。

6.I want a front page retraction - due prominence - in next week's Sunday Times.

我希望在下周的星期日泰晤士报上看到一个突出的头版新闻。

7.His retraction predicates a change of attitude.

他的退缩表示他态度有了变化。

8."I sincerely apologize for any confusion that its publication may have caused," Dr. Buck wrote in the retraction of the Science paper.

“我真诚地为它的发表可能造成的任何混乱道歉。”巴克博士在《科学》杂志论文的撤回中写道。

9.After reviewing the evidence, the newspaper published a retraction of the false claims made in their article.

在审查证据后，报纸发表了对其文章中错误声明的撤回。

10.His retraction of the statement was unexpected and left many people confused.

他的撤回声明出乎意料，让许多人感到困惑。

11.The company issued a retraction of its advertisement after receiving complaints from consumers.

该公司在收到消费者投诉后发布了广告的撤回。

12.The author submitted a retraction to the journal after discovering a significant mistake in their research.

作者在发现研究中存在重大错误后向期刊提交了撤回。

13.The scientist issued a formal retraction of his previous findings due to errors in the data.

这位科学家因数据错误正式发布了他的研究结果的撤回。

作文

In the world of journalism and publishing, the term retraction refers to the formal withdrawal of a statement, article, or publication that has been found to be false, misleading, or erroneous. This process is crucial for maintaining the integrity and credibility of the media. A retraction is not merely a correction; it signifies that the original content was so flawed that it could no longer be considered reliable. For instance, if a news outlet publishes an article claiming that a public figure committed a crime based on incorrect information, a subsequent retraction would be necessary to clarify that the information was false and to restore trust with the audience.The implications of a retraction can be significant. When a major newspaper retracts a story, it does not only affect the credibility of the publication but also impacts the individuals involved. The public figure who was wrongfully accused may suffer damage to their reputation, and the journalists responsible for the error might face professional repercussions. Thus, the act of issuing a retraction serves as a reminder of the responsibility that comes with the power of the pen.Moreover, the digital age has transformed how retractions are perceived and executed. With information spreading rapidly through social media, a single erroneous post can go viral before any retraction can be made. This phenomenon often leads to widespread misinformation, making it even more critical for publishers to address errors promptly and transparently. In some cases, a simple retraction may not suffice, and additional measures such as public apologies or detailed explanations may be required to regain public trust.In academia, the concept of retraction holds similar weight. Research papers that contain significant errors or unethical practices may be formally retracted from journals. This ensures that the scientific community maintains high standards of integrity and reliability in published research. A retraction in this context not only corrects the academic record but also serves as a cautionary tale for researchers about the importance of thorough peer review and ethical conduct in research.Ultimately, the ability to issue a retraction demonstrates an organization's commitment to truth and accountability. It is a vital aspect of responsible communication, whether in journalism, academia, or any other field where information dissemination is critical. By acknowledging mistakes and taking steps to correct them, organizations can foster a culture of transparency and trust.In conclusion, a retraction is much more than just a simple correction; it is a powerful tool for upholding integrity and accountability. Whether in the media or academic circles, the act of retracting misleading or false information is essential for maintaining credibility and trust with the audience. As we navigate an increasingly complex information landscape, understanding the significance of retraction will become ever more important in ensuring that the truth prevails over misinformation.

在新闻和出版的世界中，术语retraction指的是正式撤回一项声明、文章或出版物，这些内容被发现是虚假的、误导性的或错误的。这个过程对于维护媒体的完整性和可信度至关重要。retraction不仅仅是一个更正；它意味着原始内容存在严重缺陷，以至于不能再被视为可靠。例如，如果一家新闻机构基于不正确的信息发布了一篇声称某公共人物犯罪的文章，那么随后的retraction将是必要的，以澄清该信息是虚假的，并恢复与观众的信任。retraction的影响可能是显著的。当一家主要报纸撤回一篇报道时，它不仅影响出版物的可信度，还影响相关个人。被错误指控的公众人物可能会遭受名誉损害，而负责错误的记者可能面临职业后果。因此，发布retraction的行为提醒人们，掌握笔杆子的力量伴随着责任。此外，数字时代改变了人们对retractions的看法和执行方式。随着信息通过社交媒体迅速传播，一条错误的帖子可能在任何retraction发布之前就已经病毒式传播。这种现象常常导致广泛的错误信息，使得出版商更加迫切需要及时和透明地处理错误。在某些情况下，简单的retraction可能不足以弥补，可能需要额外的措施，例如公开道歉或详细解释，以重新赢得公众信任。在学术界，retraction的概念具有类似的重要性。包含重大错误或不道德行为的研究论文可能会被正式撤回。这确保科学界在已发表研究中保持高标准的诚信和可靠性。在这种情况下，retraction不仅纠正了学术记录，还为研究人员提供了一个警示故事，提醒他们在研究中彻底同行评审和道德行为的重要性。最终，发布retraction的能力展示了一个组织对真相和问责制的承诺。这是负责任沟通的重要方面，无论是在新闻、学术界还是其他任何信息传播至关重要的领域。通过承认错误并采取措施进行纠正，组织可以培养透明和信任的文化。总之，retraction不仅仅是一个简单的更正；它是维护诚信和问责制的有力工具。无论是在媒体还是学术圈，撤回误导性或虚假信息的行为对于维护与观众的可信度和信任至关重要。在我们导航日益复杂的信息环境时，理解retraction的重要性将变得愈发重要，以确保真相战胜错误信息。