potshot
简明释义
n. 乱射;肆意抨击
v. 肆意抨击;射击(potshoot 的过去分词)
复 数 p o t s h o t s
第 三 人 称 单 数 p o t s h o t s
现 在 分 词 p o t s h o t t i n g
过 去 式 p o t s h o t 或 p o t s h o t t e d
过 去 分 词 p o t s h o t 或 p o t s h o t t e d
英英释义
单词用法
进行随意的攻击 | |
对...进行攻击或批评 | |
随意的评论 | |
随意的批评 |
同义词
射击 | 他在辩论中对那位政治家进行了攻击。 |
反义词
有意的射击 | 狙击手对敌人进行了有意的射击。 | ||
针对性的攻击 | The military launched a targeted attack on the insurgent base. | 军方对叛乱分子的基地发起了针对性的攻击。 |
例句
1.Somebody took a potshot at him as he drove past.
他开车通过的时候,有人向他乱开了一枪。
2.Somebody took a potshot at him as he drove past.
他开车通过的时候,有人向他乱开了一枪。
3.The critic took a potshot at the movie's plot, calling it predictable.
评论家对电影的情节进行了抨击,称其可预测。
4.In the debate, he made a potshot at his opponent's past mistakes.
在辩论中,他对对手的过去错误进行了攻击。
5.She took a potshot at the new policy, arguing it would hurt small businesses.
她对新政策进行了抨击,认为这会伤害小企业。
6.The comedian often takes potshots at celebrities during his routines.
这位喜剧演员在表演中经常对名人进行讽刺。
7.He couldn't resist taking a potshot at his colleague's work ethic.
他忍不住对同事的工作态度进行了一番批评。
作文
In today's fast-paced world, social media has become a platform where people often take potshots at each other. The term potshot refers to a criticism or attack that is made without careful consideration, often aimed at someone who is unable to defend themselves effectively. This phenomenon is particularly prevalent among public figures, celebrities, and politicians, who are frequently targeted by online trolls and commentators. The ease of posting comments online allows individuals to make potshots from behind the safety of their screens. They can express their opinions without facing direct consequences, which leads to a culture of negativity and hostility. For instance, during election seasons, candidates often find themselves on the receiving end of potshots from opponents and the media alike. These attacks can be based on trivial issues or personal flaws rather than substantive policy discussions.Moreover, the use of potshots can detract from meaningful dialogue. Instead of engaging in thoughtful debate, many choose to throw potshots that serve only to demean others. This behavior not only reflects poorly on the individual making the comment but also contributes to a toxic environment where constructive criticism is overshadowed by personal attacks.In educational settings, students may also resort to making potshots at their peers. Bullying can manifest through these quick jabs, leading to emotional distress for those targeted. Schools have recognized the need to address this issue and promote a more supportive atmosphere where students feel safe from such unwarranted attacks.Interestingly, while potshots are often seen as negative, they can sometimes serve a purpose. In the realm of sports, for example, fans frequently take potshots at opposing teams or players, which can create a sense of camaraderie among supporters. This type of banter, when kept light-hearted, can enhance the enjoyment of the game. However, it is essential to draw the line between playful teasing and hurtful remarks.As we navigate the complexities of communication in the digital age, it is crucial to be mindful of how we express our opinions. Instead of resorting to potshots, we should strive for more constructive conversations. By focusing on facts and respectful discourse, we can foster an environment where ideas can be exchanged freely and without fear of ridicule.In conclusion, while potshots may seem like an easy way to vent frustration or assert dominance, they ultimately do more harm than good. Whether in politics, social media, or everyday interactions, taking aim at others without thought can lead to a breakdown in communication and understanding. It is time we put an end to the culture of potshots and work towards building a more respectful and empathetic society. Only then can we hope to engage in meaningful discussions that lead to positive change.
在当今快节奏的世界中,社交媒体已成为人们常常相互攻击的平台。术语potshot指的是一种没有经过仔细考虑的批评或攻击,通常针对那些无法有效自我辩护的人。这种现象在公众人物、名人和政治家中尤为普遍,他们经常成为网络喷子和评论者的目标。在线发布评论的便利性使得个人可以在屏幕后面发出potshots。他们可以表达自己的意见,而无需面对直接后果,这导致了负面和敌对的文化。例如,在选举季节,候选人常常发现自己受到对手和媒体的potshots攻击。这些攻击可能基于微不足道的问题或个人缺陷,而不是实质性的政策讨论。此外,使用potshots可能会削弱有意义的对话。许多人选择抛出potshots,而不是参与深入的辩论。这种行为不仅反映了发表评论的个人的形象,也助长了一种有毒的环境,在这个环境中,建设性的批评被人身攻击所掩盖。在教育环境中,学生们也可能会对同龄人进行potshots。这种快速的攻击可能表现为欺凌,给被针对者带来情感上的困扰。学校已经意识到解决这一问题的必要性,并倡导一种更加支持的氛围,让学生免受此类无端攻击。有趣的是,虽然potshots通常被视为负面的,但它们有时也能发挥作用。在体育领域,例如,球迷常常对对方球队或球员进行potshots,这可以增强支持者之间的团结感。当这种调侃保持轻松时,可以提升比赛的乐趣。然而,重要的是要划清玩笑和伤害性言论之间的界限。随着我们在数字时代中导航沟通的复杂性,关注我们表达意见的方式至关重要。与其诉诸于potshots,不如努力进行更具建设性的对话。通过关注事实和尊重的讨论,我们可以营造一个自由交流思想而不必担心嘲讽的环境。总之,尽管potshots似乎是发泄挫折或主张主导地位的简单方式,但它们最终造成的伤害大于好处。无论是在政治、社交媒体还是日常互动中,毫无思考地攻击他人可能导致沟通和理解的破裂。是时候结束potshots的文化,努力建立一个更加尊重和富有同情心的社会。只有这样,我们才能希望进行有意义的讨论,从而带来积极的变化。