meritocratic

简明释义

英[ˌmerɪtəˈkrætɪk]美[ˌmerɪtəˈkrætɪk]

精英管理的

贤能统治的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The new India, however, is a more meritocratic country.

然而，新生的印度是个更加精英化的国家。

2.Thanks to a meritocratic culture, and the discipline of having some of its stock traded, Petrobras is a leader in deep-sea oil.

Petrobras不同于 Pemex，多亏它英才管理的企业文化和部分股票交易的原则，Petrobras在深海石油行业中处于领导者的地位。

3.What Mike favors, the meritocratic system.

麦克所倾向的，择优的体系。

4.The risk tolerance and meritocratic ethos of Silicon Valley financiers provided extraordinary opportunities, especially for foreigners.

硅谷金融家们的风险容忍度和精英管理精神提供了一些非凡的机会，特别是为那些外国人。

5.China is certainly not yet as meritocratic as it can be and should be, "he says."

“中国当然还不如用人唯才，因为它可以而且应该，”他说。

6.From the standpoint of the meritocratic conception.

从择优概念的立场[来看上述问题]。

7.That leads to the meritocratic system.

那就是择优体系。

8.Petrobras is not Pemex. Thanks to a meritocratic culture, and the discipline of having some of its stock traded, Petrobras is a leader in deep-sea oil.

巴西石油公司不同于墨西哥石油公司，由于它具备精英管理的企业文化和严格的股票交易原则，巴西石油在深海石油行业中是领导者。

9.He was promoted in a meritocratic manner, reflecting his hard work and dedication.

他的晋升是以精英主义的方式进行的，反映了他的努力和奉献。

10.Many believe that a meritocratic system is the best way to achieve equality in opportunities.

许多人认为，精英主义的体系是实现机会平等的最佳方式。

11.The school's meritocratic admission process ensures that only the most qualified students are accepted.

学校的精英主义的招生过程确保只有最合格的学生被录取。

12.In a meritocratic society, individuals are rewarded for their skills and efforts rather than their background.

在一个精英主义的社会中，个人因其技能和努力而受到奖励，而不是因其背景。

13.The company prides itself on being a meritocratic organization where promotions are based on performance.

这家公司以成为一个精英主义的组织而自豪，晋升是基于表现的。

作文

In contemporary society, the concept of a meritocratic system is often discussed in relation to education and employment. A meritocratic society is one where individuals are rewarded based on their abilities and talents rather than their social status or background. This idea promotes fairness and equality, suggesting that anyone, regardless of their origins, can achieve success through hard work and dedication. However, the implementation of a truly meritocratic system poses significant challenges. For instance, educational opportunities are not equally accessible to everyone. Children from affluent families often have access to better resources, such as private tutoring and extracurricular activities, which can enhance their chances of academic success. In contrast, those from less privileged backgrounds may struggle to obtain the same level of support, leading to disparities in educational outcomes. This raises the question: can a system that is supposed to be meritocratic genuinely function if the starting points for individuals are so vastly different?Moreover, the definition of 'merit' itself can be subjective. Different cultures and societies may prioritize different skills and attributes. For example, in some environments, creativity and innovation are highly valued, while in others, traditional academic achievements might hold more weight. This subjectivity complicates the notion of a meritocratic system, as what is considered 'merit' can vary widely among different groups.Another aspect to consider is the potential for bias within a meritocratic framework. Even in systems designed to reward merit, unconscious biases can influence decisions about hiring, promotions, and other forms of recognition. For instance, studies have shown that resumes with traditionally 'ethnic-sounding' names are often rated lower than identical resumes with more common names. Such biases undermine the integrity of a meritocratic system and perpetuate inequality.Despite these challenges, striving for a meritocratic society remains a noble goal. It encourages individuals to develop their skills and pursue excellence, fostering an environment of competition and innovation. To move closer to a true meritocratic society, we must focus on creating equal opportunities for all. This can include policies aimed at improving access to quality education, mentorship programs for underprivileged youth, and initiatives designed to reduce biases in hiring practices.In conclusion, while the ideal of a meritocratic society is appealing, achieving it requires significant effort and commitment. We must recognize the barriers that prevent true meritocracy from flourishing and work towards dismantling them. By doing so, we can create a society where individuals are genuinely rewarded based on their talents and efforts, allowing everyone to reach their full potential, regardless of their background.

在当代社会，meritocratic（精英主义）体系的概念经常与教育和就业相关讨论。meritocratic社会是一个根据个人的能力和才能而非社会地位或背景来奖励个体的社会。这一理念促进了公平和平等，表明任何人，无论其出身如何，都可以通过努力工作和奉献精神取得成功。然而，真正实施一个meritocratic体系面临着重大挑战。例如，教育机会并非对每个人都同样可得。来自富裕家庭的儿童通常能够获得更好的资源，比如私人辅导和课外活动，这些都可以提高他们的学业成功几率。相比之下，来自较少特权背景的孩子可能很难获得同样水平的支持，从而导致教育结果的不平等。这引发了一个问题：如果个体的起点如此不同，一个本应是meritocratic的体系能否真正运作？此外，“merit”的定义本身也可能是主观的。不同的文化和社会可能会优先考虑不同的技能和属性。例如，在某些环境中，创造力和创新能力受到高度重视，而在其他环境中，传统的学术成就可能更具权重。这种主观性使得meritocratic体系的概念变得复杂，因为被认为是“merit”的东西在不同群体之间可能差异很大。另一个需要考虑的方面是，在meritocratic框架内可能存在偏见。即使在旨在奖励merit的系统中，无意识的偏见也会影响关于招聘、晋升和其他形式认可的决定。例如，研究表明，带有传统“民族名字”的简历往往比带有更常见名字的相同简历评估得更低。这种偏见削弱了meritocratic体系的完整性，并延续了不平等。尽管面临这些挑战，追求meritocratic社会仍然是一个崇高的目标。它鼓励个人发展自己的技能，追求卓越，培养竞争和创新的环境。为了更接近真正的meritocratic社会，我们必须专注于创造人人平等的机会。这可以包括旨在改善获取优质教育的政策、为贫困青少年提供的导师计划，以及旨在减少招聘实践中的偏见的举措。总之，虽然meritocratic社会的理想令人向往，但实现这一目标需要巨大的努力和承诺。我们必须认识到阻碍真正精英主义蓬勃发展的障碍，并致力于消除这些障碍。通过这样做，我们可以创造一个社会，在这个社会中，个体是真正根据他们的才能和努力得到奖励的，使每个人都能充分发挥潜力，无论其背景如何。