gawker
简明释义
n. 伸长脖子呆看的人
英英释义
一个以粗鲁或愚蠢的方式盯着某物看的人。 |
单词用法
现场的围观者 | |
不要做个看热闹的人 | |
围观文化 | |
盯着某事看 |
同义词
旁观者 | 旁观者聚集在事故现场。 | ||
路人 | 作为路人,她在争吵中感到无能为力。 | ||
观众 | 观众们在运动员比赛时欢呼。 | ||
观察者 | 观察者记录了动物的行为。 |
反义词
参与者 | 作为活动的参与者,她感到更加投入。 | ||
执行者 | 执行者往往比旁观者更受赞赏。 |
例句
1."Sometimes one sees writers just standing before it, like early hominids in front of a monolith," said Nick Denton, Gawker Media's founder.
“有时有人会注意到作者们只是站在它面前,犹如原始人类站在巨石前一样,”高科传媒的创始人尼克·丹顿说。
2.At Gawker, it is not uncommon for editors to stay on the job for just a year.
在高科,编辑仅仅在职一年是很常见的。
3.Even if you weren't affected by the Gawker breach, now is a good time to ensure you're truly safe online.
即使你没有被Gawker网的入侵事件所影响,现在也是时候来确保你在网上的绝对安全。
4."Sometimes one sees writers just standing before it, like early hominids in front of a monolith," said Nick Denton, Gawker Media's founder. Mr. Denton said not all writers have warmed to the concept.
“有时有人会注意到作者们只是站在它面前,犹如原始人类站在巨石前一样,”高科传媒的创始人尼克·丹顿说。
5.Mr. Harder demanded that Gawker immediately remove the article and publish a public apology and full retraction.
哈德要求高客传媒立刻撤掉这篇文章,并发表公开道歉信,全面收回自己的陈述。
6."Sometimes one sees writers just standing before it, like early hominids in front of a monolith," said Nick Denton, Gawker Media's founder. Mr. Denton said not all writers have warmed to the concept.
“有时有人会注意到作者们只是站在它面前,犹如原始人类站在巨石前一样,”高科传媒的创始人尼克·丹顿说。
7.One hacker - identified as IAMDGKZ1 - told Gawker they had information on a well-known film director.
一位名号为IAMDGKZ1的黑客成员告诉Gawker说,他们握有一位著名电影导演的信息。
8.The letter continues a legal battle between Mr. Harder and Gawker.
这封信延续了哈德与高客之间的法律争斗。
9.During the parade, the gawkers cheered and took photos of the floats.
在游行期间,围观者们欢呼并拍摄花车的照片。
10.The news report showed a video of the gawkers at the scene of the fire.
新闻报道展示了火灾现场的围观者视频。
11.The street performer attracted a large group of gawkers who were fascinated by his tricks.
这位街头表演者吸引了一大群对他把戏感到着迷的围观者。
12.As the accident unfolded, many gawkers slowed down to see what had happened.
事故发生时,许多围观者减速查看发生了什么。
13.The celebrity's arrival caused a crowd of gawkers to gather outside the venue.
这位名人的到来导致一群围观者聚集在场外。
作文
In today's fast-paced world, where everyone is constantly glued to their screens, the phenomenon of the gawker (围观者) has become increasingly prevalent. A gawker is someone who stares or looks intently at something, often out of curiosity or a desire to witness an event that is not part of their everyday life. This behavior can be observed in various contexts, from the mundane to the extraordinary.For instance, consider a typical day in a bustling city. People are going about their business, commuting to work, or heading to meet friends. Suddenly, an accident occurs on the street. Instantly, a crowd forms as individuals stop to gawk at the scene. The gawkers (围观者) are drawn to the unexpected event, their eyes fixated on the chaos unfolding before them. They may not have any direct involvement in the situation, but the allure of witnessing something unusual compels them to linger.This behavior raises interesting questions about human nature and our innate curiosity. Why do we feel compelled to be gawkers (围观者)? Is it simply a matter of wanting to see something out of the ordinary, or does it reflect deeper psychological needs? Some psychologists suggest that being a gawker (围观者) allows individuals to experience excitement vicariously. In a world where many people lead routine lives, the chance to witness drama or spectacle can be thrilling.Moreover, the rise of social media has amplified this tendency. With platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter, sharing moments of intrigue has never been easier. People can become gawkers (围观者) from the comfort of their homes, scrolling through feeds filled with videos and images that capture attention. Viral videos often feature shocking or sensational content, drawing in millions of viewers who engage in the act of gawking from afar.However, there are ethical considerations surrounding the actions of gawkers (围观者). When tragedy strikes, such as a natural disaster or a violent incident, the presence of gawkers (围观者) can sometimes hinder rescue efforts. Instead of helping, they stand by, capturing footage for their social media accounts. This raises the question: when does curiosity cross the line into insensitivity? Furthermore, the term gawker (围观者) can carry negative connotations. It suggests a lack of action or engagement, merely observing rather than participating. In some cases, being labeled a gawker (围观者) implies a certain passivity, as if one is content to watch life unfold without contributing to it. This notion encourages self-reflection. Are we, as individuals, too often mere gawkers (围观者) in our own lives? Do we watch opportunities pass us by instead of seizing them?In conclusion, the concept of the gawker (围观者) is multifaceted, intertwining curiosity, social behavior, and ethical dilemmas. As society continues to evolve with technology, the role of the gawker (围观者) will likely change, but the fundamental human desire to observe and understand will remain. Whether we are gawkers (围观者) in a crowd or online, it is essential to balance our curiosity with empathy and action, ensuring that we do not reduce ourselves to passive observers of the world around us.
在当今快节奏的世界中,人们总是紧盯着屏幕,gawker(围观者)现象变得越来越普遍。gawker 指的是那些出于好奇或想目睹与自己日常生活无关的事件而凝视或注视某物的人。这种行为可以在各种场合中观察到,从平凡到非凡。例如,考虑一个繁忙城市的典型一天。人们正忙于自己的事情,通勤上班或去见朋友。突然,一起事故发生在街头。瞬间,随着人们停下脚步围观,形成了一个人群。gawkers(围观者)被意外事件吸引,目光紧盯着眼前的混乱。他们可能与该事件没有直接关系,但目睹不寻常事物的诱惑促使他们停留。这种行为引发了关于人性和我们与生俱来的好奇心的有趣问题。为什么我们会感到有必要成为gawkers(围观者)?这仅仅是想看到一些不寻常的事物,还是反映了更深层的心理需求?一些心理学家认为,成为gawker(围观者)让个人能够间接体验刺激。在许多人过着例行生活的世界里,目睹戏剧或壮观的机会可能令人兴奋。此外,社交媒体的兴起加剧了这种倾向。通过Instagram、TikTok和Twitter等平台,分享引人注目的时刻从未如此容易。人们可以在家中舒适地成为gawkers(围观者),滚动浏览充满视频和图像的动态,这些内容吸引了注意力。病毒式视频通常展示震惊或耸人听闻的内容,吸引数百万观众,他们在远处参与围观的行为。然而,围观者的行为也引发了伦理上的考虑。当悲剧发生时,例如自然灾害或暴力事件,gawkers(围观者)的存在有时会妨碍救援工作。人们并不提供帮助,而是站在一旁,为社交媒体账户拍摄镜头。这引发了一个问题:好奇心何时越过了无情的界限?此外,gawker(围观者)这个词可能带有负面含义。它暗示缺乏行动或参与,仅仅是观察而不是参与。在某些情况下,被贴上gawker(围观者)标签意味着某种消极性,仿佛一个人满足于观看生活展开,而不是为之贡献。这一概念鼓励自我反思。我们作为个体,是否过于频繁地在自己的生活中充当gawkers(围观者)?我们是否在看着机会从我们身边溜走,而不去抓住它们?总之,gawker(围观者)的概念是多方面的,交织着好奇心、社会行为和伦理困境。随着社会在技术上不断发展,gawker(围观者)的角色可能会改变,但基本的人类观察和理解的渴望将会持续。无论我们是在人群中还是在线上成为gawkers(围观者),平衡我们的好奇心与同情心和行动至关重要,以确保我们不会把自己简化为周围世界的被动观察者。