plutocrats

简明释义

英[ˈpluːtəkræts]美[ˈpluːtəkræts]

n. 富豪；财阀政治（plutocrat 的复数形式）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.So, these are creators, they're not plutocrats.

所以，他们是创造者，而不是财阀。

2.The Raffles Hotel Singapore is a symbolic building in Singapore. It was built in 1887 by Sarkies brothers the plutocrats from Armenia.

莱佛士大酒店是新加坡地标性建筑，在1887年由来自于亚美尼亚的富豪薛克兹兄弟修建。

3.He is similarly unsparing about the plutocrats and Wall Street luminaries of his day, who he argued had destroyed the innate generosity of Americans and replaced it with greed and selfishness.

他对于那个年代的财阀和华尔街大亨们也是同样毫无仁慈之心，他称后者摧毁了美国人天生的慷慨大方，并代之以贪婪和自私。

4.He is similarly unsparing about the plutocrats and Wall Street luminaries of his day, who he argued had destroyed the innate generosity of Americans and replaced it with greed and selfishness.

他对于那个年代的财阀和华尔街大亨们也是同样毫无仁慈之心，他称后者摧毁了美国人天生的慷慨大方，并代之以贪婪和自私。

5.Are we destined to become a society of plutocrats, ensnared by the lure of filthy lucre even as we hold our noses at the stench of ill-gotten gains?

我们是不是注定要形成一个社会，大亨们受到不义之财的诱惑，即便我们对这些来路不正的臭钱不屑一顾？

6.The plutocrats may yet be tightening their purse strings.

而富豪们可能仍旧会捂紧自己的钱包。

7.Whatever they say, the fact is that people like Mr. Shelby are on the side of the plutocrats; the American people should be on the side of the punks, who are trying to protect their interests.

他们各执一词，但是谢尔巴一类人会站在财阀一边，美国人民会站在朋克这边捍卫他们自己的利益。

8.Plutocrats who win political power will not necessarily wield it well, as Italy has found.

正如意大利人发现的那样，财阀一旦掌力，不一定能够很好地运用权力。

9.Since the pay of these plutocrats is highly variable, a bad year for them means a bad year for the taxman.

由于财阀的纳税额极其易变，他们赚不到钱即意味着收税人的坏年成。

10.Even very rich men, however, cannot lay their hands on treasures that have already come to rest in museums or the private collections of other plutocrats.

虽然如此，即使是非常有钱的人，也不能得到已经陈列在博物馆或是其他富豪私人收藏的藏品。

11.The growing gap between the rich and the poor is often attributed to the power of plutocrats 富豪 in society.

贫富差距的加大常常归因于社会中富豪的权力。

12.Many believe that plutocrats 富豪 should be taxed more heavily to address income inequality.

许多人认为，应该对富豪征收更重的税，以解决收入不平等问题。

13.Critics argue that plutocrats 富豪 are undermining democracy by funding political campaigns.

批评者认为，富豪通过资助政治竞选正在破坏民主。

14.In many countries, the influence of plutocrats 富豪 can overshadow the voices of ordinary citizens.

在许多国家，富豪的影响力可以压倒普通公民的声音。

15.The policies proposed by the government often seem to favor plutocrats 富豪 over the working class.

政府提出的政策常常似乎更有利于富豪而非工人阶级。

作文

In today's world, the term plutocrats refers to individuals who hold significant wealth and influence, often using their financial power to shape political and social landscapes. These wealthy elites are not just business leaders; they can also be politicians, celebrities, or anyone who has amassed considerable wealth. The concept of plutocrats is not new, as history is replete with examples of rich individuals who have wielded power beyond their economic status. However, the modern manifestation of plutocrats raises important questions about democracy, equity, and the role of money in politics.One of the most concerning aspects of plutocrats is their ability to influence government policies and decisions. In many democracies, the political landscape has become increasingly dominated by money. Campaign financing, lobbying, and political donations often mean that the voices of the wealthy are amplified, while the needs and concerns of the average citizen are sidelined. This creates a system where the interests of plutocrats take precedence over those of the general populace, leading to policies that favor the rich and exacerbate income inequality.Moreover, the rise of technology and social media has further empowered plutocrats. With platforms like Twitter and Facebook, wealthy individuals can easily disseminate their ideas and influence public opinion. This direct line to the masses allows plutocrats to bypass traditional media channels, which often serve as gatekeepers of information. While this democratization of information can be seen as positive, it also means that misinformation and propaganda can spread just as quickly, allowing plutocrats to manipulate public perception.The impact of plutocrats on society extends beyond politics; it permeates cultural and social norms as well. When individuals with vast resources dictate trends, lifestyles, and values, it can lead to a homogenization of culture that prioritizes wealth over creativity and individuality. This can create a society where success is measured solely by financial gain, rather than contributions to community, art, or science. As a result, the aspirations of young people may become skewed, leading them to chase wealth at the expense of personal fulfillment and societal betterment.However, it is essential to recognize that not all plutocrats are inherently detrimental to society. Many wealthy individuals engage in philanthropy and use their resources to address social issues. Through charitable foundations and initiatives, some plutocrats strive to make a positive impact, tackling problems such as poverty, education, and health care. This duality presents a complex picture: while plutocrats can perpetuate inequality, they also have the potential to drive meaningful change.In conclusion, the influence of plutocrats in our society is profound and multifaceted. As we navigate the challenges of modern governance and social equity, it is crucial to remain vigilant about the power dynamics at play. Engaging in discussions about wealth, power, and responsibility can help ensure that the interests of all citizens are represented, not just those of the plutocrats. Ultimately, fostering a more equitable society requires a collective effort to challenge the status quo and advocate for policies that promote fairness and justice for everyone.

在当今世界，术语plutocrats指的是那些拥有显著财富和影响力的个人，他们常常利用自己的财力来塑造政治和社会格局。这些富有的精英不仅仅是商业领袖；他们也可以是政治家、名人或任何积累了相当财富的人。Plutocrats的概念并不新鲜，历史上充满了富裕个体超越其经济地位行使权力的例子。然而，plutocrats的现代表现引发了关于民主、公平和金钱在政治中角色的重要问题。Plutocrats最令人担忧的方面之一是他们对政府政策和决策的影响。在许多民主国家，政治格局越来越被金钱主导。竞选融资、游说和政治捐款往往意味着富人的声音被放大，而普通公民的需求和关注则被边缘化。这创造了一个系统，在这个系统中，plutocrats的利益优先于普通大众的利益，导致有利于富人的政策，加剧收入不平等。此外，科技和社交媒体的崛起进一步增强了plutocrats的能力。通过Twitter和Facebook等平台，富有的个人可以轻松传播他们的想法并影响公众舆论。这条直通大众的通道使得plutocrats能够绕过传统媒体渠道，而这些渠道通常作为信息的守门人。尽管这种信息的民主化可以被视为积极的，但这也意味着虚假信息和宣传可以同样迅速传播，使得plutocrats能够操纵公众认知。Plutocrats对社会的影响不仅限于政治；它还渗透到文化和社会规范中。当拥有巨大资源的个体主导趋势、生活方式和价值观时，可能会导致一种文化的同质化，优先考虑财富而非创造力和个性。因此，一个社会的成功可能仅仅通过经济收益来衡量，而不是对社区、艺术或科学的贡献。结果，年轻人的抱负可能会变得扭曲，导致他们追逐财富而牺牲个人满足感和社会改善。然而，必须认识到，并非所有的plutocrats对社会都是有害的。许多富有的个人参与慈善事业，并利用他们的资源来解决社会问题。通过慈善基金会和倡议，一些plutocrats努力产生积极的影响，解决贫困、教育和医疗等问题。这种二元性呈现出复杂的图景：虽然plutocrats可能会加剧不平等，但他们也有潜力推动有意义的变革。总之，plutocrats在我们社会中的影响深远且多面。随着我们应对现代治理和社会公平的挑战，保持对权力动态的警惕至关重要。就财富、权力和责任进行讨论可以帮助确保所有公民的利益得到代表，而不仅仅是plutocrats的利益。最终，促进一个更加公平的社会需要共同努力，以挑战现状并倡导促进每个人公平与正义的政策。