unilateralist

简明释义

英[ˌjuːnɪˈlætrəlɪst]美[ˌjuːnɪˈlætrəlɪst]

n. 主张片面限武论者；单边主义者

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The secret American programme to track bank transfers, its nuclear deal with India, and CIA flights in Europe are all seen as evidence of America's unilateralist instincts.

美国秘密策划追查银行转帐、其与印度的核交易以及中情局在欧洲的飞行小队（什么意思，我也不知道，大家帮帮忙，我觉得我的flight翻错了，可惜只有金山词霸）都被视为美国单边主义的明证。

2.The secret American programme to track bank transfers, its nuclear deal with India, and CIA flights in Europe are all seen as evidence of America's unilateralist instincts.

美国秘密策划追查银行转帐、其与印度的核交易以及中情局在欧洲的飞行小队（什么意思，我也不知道，大家帮帮忙，我觉得我的flight翻错了，可惜只有金山词霸）都被视为美国单边主义的明证。

3.One of the politer accusations is that he is a “unilateralist”.

有些比较有礼貌的攻击者指责他是“单边主义者”。

4.He's a resolute unilateralist.

他是一个坚决的单边主义者。

5.But, at the same time, there are many existing problems, which will do harm to the development of education including unilateralist reason, imbalance attribution ;

但与此同时，教育批评仍然存在著一些误区，如片面思考、归因失衡； 激愤有余、理性不足； 盲目求热、重复多变；

6.One of the polite accusations is that he is a " unilateralist".

其中较文雅的指责是他是一个“单方面动武主义”。

7.As a unilateralist, he prefers to make decisions without consulting other nations.

作为一个单边主义者，他更喜欢在不咨询其他国家的情况下做出决定。

8.The unilateralist policies of the past have left many countries feeling isolated.

过去的单边主义者政策让许多国家感到孤立。

9.The president's decision to withdraw from the treaty was criticized by many as a move towards being a unilateralist.

总统决定退出条约被许多人批评为朝着成为一个单边主义者的方向发展。

10.In international relations, a unilateralist approach often leads to tensions with allies.

在国际关系中，单边主义者的做法往往会导致与盟友的紧张关系。

11.Some argue that a unilateralist stance can undermine global cooperation.

一些人认为，单边主义者的立场可能会削弱全球合作。

作文

In the realm of international relations, the term unilateralist refers to a country or leader that prefers to act independently rather than in cooperation with other nations. This approach can often lead to significant consequences, both positive and negative. A classic example of unilateralism is the foreign policy adopted by certain nations that choose to bypass multilateral agreements or organizations to pursue their own interests. While this strategy may yield immediate benefits or allow for swift decision-making, it can also result in strained relationships with allies and increased global tensions.One of the most notable instances of unilateralism in recent history was the decision by the United States to withdraw from the Paris Agreement on climate change under the previous administration. This move was seen by many as a clear indication of unilateralist tendencies, prioritizing national interests over collective global efforts to combat climate change. Critics argued that such actions undermine international cooperation and set a dangerous precedent for other countries to follow. The withdrawal not only affected the U.S.'s standing in the world but also raised concerns about the future of global environmental initiatives.Furthermore, unilateralism can manifest in military actions, where a nation decides to engage in conflict without the backing of international coalitions or support from the United Nations. For instance, the invasion of Iraq in 2003 by the United States, which was conducted without explicit approval from the UN Security Council, is often cited as a prime example of unilateralist military intervention. Although the rationale behind the invasion was framed around national security and the fight against terrorism, the long-term consequences included regional instability and a backlash against perceived American imperialism.The implications of unilateralism extend beyond immediate political outcomes; they can also influence global governance structures. When a powerful nation opts for a unilateralist approach, it can weaken international institutions that rely on consensus and cooperative action. This erosion of multilateralism can lead to a fragmented global order, where countries feel compelled to act alone, further exacerbating conflicts and diminishing trust among nations.In contrast, proponents of multilateralism argue that collaborative efforts are essential for addressing complex global challenges, such as climate change, terrorism, and pandemics. They contend that working together fosters dialogue and understanding, ultimately leading to more sustainable solutions. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of international cooperation, as countries needed to share information, resources, and strategies to combat the virus effectively. This situation underscored the limitations of a unilateralist approach in times of global crisis.In conclusion, while unilateralism may offer short-term advantages in certain scenarios, its long-term effects can be detrimental to international relations and global stability. As the world faces increasingly interconnected challenges, the need for collaborative action becomes ever more critical. Countries must weigh the benefits of acting independently against the potential risks of alienating allies and undermining international frameworks designed to promote peace and cooperation. Ultimately, navigating the complexities of global politics requires a delicate balance between unilateralist impulses and the imperative of multilateral engagement.

在国际关系领域，术语单边主义者指的是一个国家或领导者更倾向于独立行动，而不是与其他国家合作。这种方法往往会导致重大的后果，无论是积极的还是消极的。单边主义的经典例子是某些国家采取的外交政策，它们选择绕过多边协议或组织，以追求自己的利益。虽然这种策略可能带来即时的好处或允许迅速决策，但也可能导致与盟友的关系紧张和全球紧张局势的加剧。最近历史上最显著的单边主义实例之一是美国在前一届政府下决定退出《巴黎协定》的气候变化协议。这一举动被许多人视为明显的单边主义者倾向，优先考虑国家利益，而不是集体全球努力应对气候变化。批评者认为，这种行为削弱了国际合作，并为其他国家效仿设定了危险的先例。退出不仅影响了美国在世界上的地位，还引发了对全球环境倡议未来的担忧。此外，单边主义还可以表现为军事行动，一个国家决定在没有国际联盟支持或联合国支持的情况下参与冲突。例如，美国在2003年入侵伊拉克的决定，常常被引用为单边主义者军事干预的典型例子。尽管入侵的理由围绕国家安全和打击恐怖主义进行框架化，但长期后果包括地区不稳定和对美国帝国主义的反弹。单边主义的影响超越了直接的政治结果；它们还可以影响全球治理结构。当一个强国选择单边主义者的方法时，可能会削弱依赖共识和合作行动的国际机构。这种多边主义的侵蚀可能导致全球秩序的破裂，各国感到被迫单独行动，进一步加剧冲突并减少国家之间的信任。相反，多边主义的支持者认为，合作努力对于应对复杂的全球挑战（如气候变化、恐怖主义和流行病）至关重要。他们主张，共同努力促进对话和理解，最终导致更可持续的解决方案。COVID-19大流行突显了国际合作的重要性，因为各国需要共享信息、资源和战略，以有效抗击病毒。这种情况强调了在全球危机时期单边主义者方法的局限性。总之，虽然单边主义在某些情况下可能提供短期优势，但其长期影响可能对国际关系和全球稳定造成损害。随着世界面临日益相互关联的挑战，合作行动的必要性变得愈加重要。各国必须权衡独立行动的好处与疏远盟友和削弱旨在促进和平与合作的国际框架的潜在风险。最终，驾驭全球政治的复杂性需要在单边主义者冲动与多边参与的必要性之间找到微妙的平衡。