distraint

简明释义

英[dɪsˈtreɪnt]美[dɪˈstreɪnt]

n. 扣押；扣押财产

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The management department in charge of keeping the distraint involved in cases work together with the department of handling cases to go through the relevant formalities of disposal.

负责保管扣押、冻结涉案款物的管理部门会同办案部门办理相关的处理手续。

2.Article 33 When disposing the distraint involved in cases, the department of handling cases shall put forward opinions which is subsequently submitted to the procurator-general for making a decision.

第三十三条处理扣押、冻结的涉案款物，应当由办案部门提出意见，报请检察长决定。

3.If the distraint is not suitable for transference, the list and photos of the distraint and other proof documents may be transferred with the case.

对不宜移送的，应当将其清单、照片或者其他证明文件随案移送。

4.If the original entity has ceased to exist or it exists but it has been written off the corrupted and misappropriated funds as losses, the distraint shall be handed over to the national treasure.

原单位已不存在或者虽然存在但对被贪污、挪用的款项已经作为损失核销的，应当上缴国库。

5.Services at distraint premises in the New Territories.

约，负责在新界区的被扣押处所提供护卫服务。

6.The recipients shall sign or affix their seals to the list of returned distraint.

领取人应当在返还款物清单上签名或者盖章。

7.If a case is dropped owing to other reasons, the people's procuratorate directly notifies the freezing bodies to hand over the distraint to the national treasure or return to the victim.

因其他原因撤销案件的，直接通知冻结机构上缴国库或者返还被害人。

8.If the distraint need to be returned to the criminal suspect, the freezing shall be cancelled before the distraint is returned to the criminal suspect or his or her legal heirs.

需要返还犯罪嫌疑人的，应当解除冻结并返还犯罪嫌疑人或者其合法继承人。

9.Article 33 When disposing the distraint involved in cases, the department of handling cases shall put forward opinions which is subsequently submitted to the procurator-general for making a decision.

第三十三条处理扣押、冻结的涉案款物，应当由办案部门提出意见，报请检察长决定。

10.The landlord initiated a distraint for unpaid rent, seizing the tenant's belongings.

房东启动了扣押程序，因租金未支付，扣押了租户的财物。

11.The company faced distraint due to failure to pay taxes, leading to the loss of equipment.

由于未能支付税款，公司面临扣押，导致设备被没收。

12.After several warnings, the creditor resorted to distraint to recover the owed amount.

在几次警告后，债权人诉诸于扣押以追回欠款。

13.The law allows distraint for certain debts, ensuring creditors can recover their losses.

法律允许对某些债务进行扣押，确保债权人能够收回损失。

14.In cases of distraint, property can be seized without a court order in some jurisdictions.

在某些司法管辖区，扣押情况下，财产可以在没有法院命令的情况下被扣押。

作文

In today's complex financial landscape, understanding various legal terms is crucial for both individuals and businesses. One such term that often arises in discussions about debt recovery is distraint. Distraint refers to the legal process by which a creditor can seize a debtor's property to satisfy an outstanding debt. This concept has its roots in common law and is still applicable in modern legal systems. It is essential to grasp the implications of distraint not only for creditors seeking to recover debts but also for debtors who may find themselves on the receiving end of such actions.The process of distraint typically begins when a debtor fails to pay a debt on time. The creditor, after exhausting other means of collection, may decide to initiate distraint. This can involve a court order or, in some jurisdictions, simply a notice to the debtor. Once the distraint is enacted, the creditor has the right to take possession of certain assets belonging to the debtor, which may include personal property, equipment, or even real estate, depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the debt.One of the critical aspects of distraint is that it must be conducted legally and fairly. Creditors cannot simply seize any property they choose; there are laws governing what can be taken and how the process must be carried out. For example, many jurisdictions protect certain types of property from distraint, such as essential household items or tools necessary for the debtor's trade. This legal framework is designed to prevent abuse and ensure that debtors are not left without the means to support themselves.For creditors, distraint can be a valuable tool for recovering debts, but it is not without its challenges. The process can be time-consuming and costly, and there is no guarantee that the seized property will cover the outstanding debt. Furthermore, creditors must be prepared for the possibility of legal disputes arising from the distraint. Debtors may contest the legality of the seizure or argue that the property taken was exempt from distraint. In such cases, both parties may end up in court, further complicating the recovery process.On the flip side, debtors facing distraint should be aware of their rights. Understanding the laws surrounding distraint can empower debtors to protect their interests. They may have options to negotiate with creditors or seek legal counsel to challenge the distraint if they believe it is unjust. Additionally, many jurisdictions offer resources for debtors, such as financial counseling services, which can help them navigate their financial difficulties and avoid distraint altogether.In conclusion, distraint is a significant legal concept that plays a vital role in the realm of debt recovery. Both creditors and debtors must understand the implications of distraint to navigate financial challenges effectively. While it serves as a mechanism for creditors to reclaim owed funds, it also highlights the importance of fairness and legal protections for debtors. Ultimately, fostering open communication between creditors and debtors can lead to more amicable resolutions and reduce the need for distraint in the first place.

在当今复杂的金融环境中，理解各种法律术语对个人和企业都至关重要。其中一个常常在债务追讨讨论中出现的术语是distraint。Distraint指的是债权人可以依法扣押债务人的财产以偿还未偿债务的法律程序。这个概念源于普通法，至今仍适用于现代法律体系。理解distraint的含义对寻求追讨债务的债权人以及可能成为此类行为受害者的债务人来说都是至关重要的。Distraint的过程通常始于债务人未按时偿还债务。当债权人用尽其他催收手段后，可能会决定启动distraint。这可能涉及法院命令，或者在某些司法管辖区，仅需向债务人发送通知。一旦执行了distraint，债权人有权占有债务人所拥有的某些资产，这可能包括个人财产、设备甚至不动产，具体取决于司法管辖区和债务性质。Distraint的一个关键方面是必须合法且公平地进行。债权人不能随意扣押他们选择的任何财产；法律规定了可以扣押什么以及如何进行该过程。例如，许多司法管辖区保护某些类型的财产不受distraint，例如必要的家庭用品或债务人职业所需的工具。这种法律框架旨在防止滥用，确保债务人不会失去维持生计的手段。对于债权人来说，distraint可以成为追回债务的有价值工具，但也并非没有挑战。该过程可能耗时且成本高昂，并且没有保证被扣押的财产会覆盖未偿债务。此外，债权人必须准备好应对因distraint而引发的法律争议。债务人可能会质疑扣押的合法性，或争辩说被扣押的财产应免于distraint。在这种情况下，双方可能会进入法庭，进一步复杂化追讨过程。另一方面，面临distraint的债务人应了解自己的权利。理解与distraint相关的法律可以使债务人保护自己的利益。他们可能有与债权人谈判的选项，或寻求法律咨询以挑战distraint，如果他们认为这是不公正的。此外，许多司法管辖区为债务人提供资源，例如财务咨询服务，可以帮助他们应对财务困难，并避免distraint的发生。总之，distraint是一个重要的法律概念，在债务追讨领域发挥着至关重要的作用。债权人和债务人都必须理解distraint的影响，以有效应对财务挑战。虽然它作为债权人追回欠款的机制，但它也突显了对债务人公平和法律保护的重要性。最终，促进债权人与债务人之间的开放沟通可以导致更友好的解决方案，并减少首次发生distraint的必要性。