detain
简明释义
v. 拘留，扣押；耽搁，阻留
第 三 人 称 单 数 d e t a i n s
现 在 分 词 d e t a i n i n g
过 去 式 d e t a i n e d
过 去 分 词 d e t a i n e d
英英释义
To keep someone in custody or under restraint, often by legal authority. | 在法律权威下拘留某人或限制其自由。 |
延迟或阻止某人或某事。 |
单词用法
拘留嫌疑人 | |
拘留一段时间 | |
无罪名拘留 | |
因进一步调查而拘留 | |
拘留并询问 | |
拘留在看守所 | |
因安全原因拘留 | |
被移民官员拘留 |
同义词
反义词
| 释放 | 囚犯在服完刑后被释放。 | ||
| 自由 | 她辞职后感到自由。 | ||
| 解放 | 活动家们努力解放那些被不公正监禁的人。 |
例句
1.It is unlawful and invalid for Japan to detain and investigate the boat captain and to take any legal measures against him.
日本船长的扣押和调查以及采取的任何法律措施都是非法的、无效的。
2.They have the power to detain you and send you back to where you came from.
他们有权利拘捕你并把你遣回原住地。
3.What else can detain him at Norland?
还有什么事情能把他耽搁在诺兰庄园呢？
4.This has long been misused by police to detain suspects without charge, even children, for as long as two years.
在过去两年里，这一法案为警察所滥用，这一法案使得警察可以在没有指控的情况下将嫌疑犯拘留，有时甚至拘留儿童。
5.But he is now being investigated on separate charges and he has been ordered to detain during the investigation.
而他现在正在接受单独的罪名调查而且已被下令在调查期间被拘留。
6.We'll have to detain you temporarily.
我们要暂时扣留你。
7.Find the bald guy with the sling and detain him!
找到那个缠着绷带的光头男人并扣留他！
8.Suddenly, two armed agents arrive to detain him.
突然，两个持枪的特工出现并扣留了他。
9.If you are caught cheating, the teacher has the right to detain you after school.
如果你被抓到作弊，老师有权在放学后拘留你。
10.Due to a security alert, they decided to detain all passengers until the situation was resolved.
由于安全警报，他们决定拘留所有乘客，直到情况得到解决。
11.The police had to detain the suspect for further questioning.
警方不得不拘留嫌疑人以进行进一步的询问。
12.The school principal may detain students after class for misbehavior.
校长可能会因学生的不当行为而拘留他们放学后。
13.Customs officials can detain travelers who do not declare their goods.
海关官员可以拘留未申报物品的旅客。
作文
In today's world, the concept of justice and individual rights is often debated. One term that frequently arises in legal discussions is detain, which means to hold someone in custody or keep them from proceeding. The implications of detain can vary greatly depending on the context in which it is used. For instance, law enforcement agencies may detain a suspect during an investigation to gather more information. This practice is crucial for maintaining public safety and ensuring that justice is served. However, the detain process must adhere to legal standards to protect individuals' rights. The balance between security and freedom is delicate. On one hand, authorities need the power to detain individuals who pose a threat to society. On the other hand, wrongful detain can lead to serious consequences, including loss of trust in the legal system and psychological harm to those affected. For example, consider the case of a person who is detained without sufficient evidence. This not only infringes on their personal liberties but also raises questions about the integrity of the law enforcement process.Moreover, the reasons for detaining someone can also be controversial. In some countries, people are detained for political reasons, which can be seen as a violation of human rights. When governments use detainment as a tool for silencing dissent, it creates a climate of fear and oppression. This misuse of power highlights the importance of oversight and accountability in the legal system.Additionally, the psychological effects of being detained can be profound. Individuals who experience detainment often report feelings of anxiety, depression, and isolation. These emotional scars can last long after their release, affecting their ability to reintegrate into society. Therefore, it is vital for authorities to consider the mental health implications when deciding to detain someone.In conclusion, while the ability to detain individuals is essential for law enforcement, it must be exercised with caution and respect for human rights. Striking a balance between safety and freedom is paramount. Society must ensure that the power to detain is not abused and that individuals are treated fairly and justly. Only through careful consideration and adherence to legal standards can we maintain a just society that values both security and individual rights.
在当今世界，正义和个人权利的概念常常受到争论。一个在法律讨论中经常出现的术语是拘留，意思是将某人拘留或阻止他们继续进行。在不同的背景下，拘留的含义可能大相径庭。例如，执法机构可能会在调查期间拘留嫌疑人以获取更多信息。这一做法对于维护公共安全和确保正义得到伸张至关重要。然而，拘留过程必须遵循法律标准，以保护个人的权利。安全与自由之间的平衡十分微妙。一方面，执法部门需要有权力去拘留那些对社会构成威胁的个人。另一方面，错误的拘留可能会导致严重后果，包括对法律系统的信任丧失和对受影响者的心理伤害。例如，考虑一个没有充分证据而被拘留的人的案例。这不仅侵犯了他们的个人自由，还引发了对执法过程完整性的质疑。此外，被拘留的原因也可能引发争议。在一些国家，人们因政治原因而被拘留，这被视为对人权的侵犯。当政府将拘留作为压制异议的工具时，它创造了一种恐惧和压迫的气候。这种权力的滥用突显了法律系统中监督和问责的重要性。此外，被拘留的心理影响可能是深远的。经历过拘留的人通常报告感到焦虑、抑郁和孤立。这些情感创伤可能在他们获释后仍然持续，影响他们重新融入社会的能力。因此，当决定是否拘留某人时，权威机构必须考虑心理健康的影响。总之，虽然拘留个人的能力对执法至关重要，但必须谨慎行使，并尊重人权。保持安全与自由之间的平衡至关重要。社会必须确保拘留的权力不被滥用，个人受到公正和公平的对待。只有通过深思熟虑和遵守法律标准，我们才能维护一个重视安全和个人权利的公正社会。
