substantialist

简明释义

英[səbˈstænʃəlɪst]美[səbˈstænʃəlɪst]

n. 实体论者；本体论者

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Really?That's quite a substantialist systems from your company for your future planing, after forty or so years of work force, you'll have a hefty sum left over for your retirement.

真的吗?那你们公司得拿出一大笔钱来资助你们的未来计划。大约工作30年后，你就会有一大笔退休金。

2.Really?That's quite a substantialist systems from your company for your future planing, after forty or so years of work force, you'll have a hefty sum left over for your retirement.

真的吗?那你们公司得拿出一大笔钱来资助你们的未来计划。大约工作30年后，你就会有一大笔退休金。

3.In the debate on metaphysics, the philosopher identified himself as a substantialist 实质主义者, arguing that objects have an essence independent of our perceptions.

在关于形而上学的辩论中，这位哲学家自称为一个substantialist 实质主义者，主张物体具有独立于我们感知的本质。

4.As a substantialist 实质主义者, she believes that reality consists of concrete substances rather than abstract concepts.

作为一个substantialist 实质主义者，她认为现实由具体的物质构成，而不是抽象的概念。

5.The substantialist 实质主义者 perspective is often used in discussions about the nature of identity and existence.

在讨论身份和存在的本质时，substantialist 实质主义者的观点常常被引用。

6.The substantialist 实质主义者 view contrasts sharply with nominalism, which denies the existence of universal entities.

这种substantialist 实质主义者观点与名义主义形成鲜明对比，后者否认普遍实体的存在。

7.Critics of substantialist 实质主义者 theories argue that they oversimplify complex social phenomena.

批评substantialist 实质主义者理论的人认为它们过于简化复杂的社会现象。

作文

In contemporary philosophical discourse, the term substantialist refers to a viewpoint that emphasizes the existence of substances as fundamental components of reality. This perspective stands in contrast to various forms of anti-substantialist thought, which argue that what we perceive as substances are merely constructs or social conventions. Understanding the implications of being a substantialist can shed light on many debates within metaphysics, epistemology, and even ethics. For instance, consider the debate surrounding the nature of identity. A substantialist approach would argue that individuals possess an intrinsic essence that defines who they are, regardless of changes in their circumstances or experiences. This idea resonates with the notion of a core self, which remains unchanged despite the flux of life. In contrast, an anti-substantialist might assert that identity is fluid and constructed through social interactions and personal narratives. The implications of adopting a substantialist perspective extend beyond identity to encompass issues of morality and ethics. If one believes in inherent qualities or substances that define good and evil, then moral truths may be seen as objective and universal. Conversely, those who reject substantialist views might argue that morality is contingent upon cultural contexts and individual perspectives, leading to a more relativistic understanding of ethical principles. Moreover, the implications of substantialist thought can be observed in the realm of science, particularly in discussions about the nature of matter and energy. Traditional scientific paradigms often align with substantialist views, positing that physical substances exist independently of our perceptions. However, advancements in quantum physics challenge these notions, suggesting that particles may not have definite properties until they are observed. This raises questions about the nature of reality itself, pushing the boundaries of substantialist thought into new territories. In practical terms, embracing a substantialist perspective can influence how we engage with the world around us. For example, in education, a substantialist view might advocate for teaching students about fixed concepts and truths, while an anti-substantialist approach could encourage critical thinking and adaptability. The former may provide a sense of stability, whereas the latter fosters creativity and innovation. Ultimately, the discussion surrounding substantialist versus anti-substantialist views invites us to reflect on our own beliefs about reality, identity, and morality. It encourages a deeper exploration of how we understand ourselves and the world, prompting us to question whether we see ourselves as possessing an unchanging essence or as dynamic beings shaped by our experiences. As we navigate these philosophical waters, it becomes crucial to recognize the value of both perspectives, acknowledging that the truth may lie somewhere in between. By engaging with the concept of substantialist thought, we open ourselves up to a richer understanding of existence, identity, and the complexities of human experience.

在当代哲学讨论中，术语substantialist指的是一种强调物质作为现实基本组成部分的观点。这种观点与各种反物质主义思想形成对比，后者认为我们所感知的物质仅仅是构造或社会约定。理解成为substantialist的含义可以阐明形而上学、认识论甚至伦理学中的许多辩论。例如，考虑身份的性质的辩论。一个substantialist的观点将认为个体拥有一种内在的本质，这定义了他们是谁，无论他们的环境或经历如何变化。这一思想与核心自我的概念相呼应，该自我在生活的变迁中保持不变。相比之下，一个反物质主义者可能会主张身份是流动的，通过社会互动和个人叙事构建而成。采用substantialist观点的影响超越了身份问题，还涵盖了道德和伦理的问题。如果一个人相信固有的品质或物质定义了善与恶，那么道德真理可能被视为客观和普遍的。相反，那些拒绝substantialist观点的人可能会争辩说，道德依赖于文化背景和个人视角，从而导致对伦理原则的相对主义理解。此外，substantialist思想的影响还可以在科学领域观察到，特别是在关于物质和能量性质的讨论中。传统科学范式通常与substantialist观点一致，认为物质独立于我们的感知而存在。然而，量子物理学的进展挑战了这些观念，表明粒子在被观察之前可能没有明确的属性。这引发了关于现实本质的问题，将substantialist思想推向新的领域。在实践层面上，接受substantialist观点可以影响我们如何与周围世界互动。例如，在教育中，substantialist观点可能主张教授学生固定的概念和真理，而反物质主义的方法则可能鼓励批判性思维和适应能力。前者可能提供一种稳定感，而后者则促进创造力和创新。最终，围绕substantialist与反物质主义观点的讨论邀请我们反思自己对现实、身份和道德的信仰。它鼓励我们更深入地探索我们如何理解自己和世界，促使我们质疑自己是否将自己视为拥有不变本质的存在，还是作为受经历塑造的动态存在。当我们在这些哲学水域中航行时，认识到两种观点的价值变得至关重要，承认真相可能位于两者之间。通过参与substantialist思想的概念，我们为更丰富地理解存在、身份和人类经验的复杂性敞开了大门。