interrogation
简明释义
英[ɪnˌterəˈɡeɪʃ(ə)n]美[ɪnˌterəˈɡeɪʃn]
n. 审问,盘问;查询;疑问句
复 数 i n t e r r o g a t i o n s
英英释义
单词用法
进行审问 | |
接受审问 | |
审问技巧 | |
审问过程 | |
严厉审问 | |
警方审问 | |
审问室 | |
友好的审问 |
同义词
反义词
对话 | 两个朋友之间的对话非常引人入胜。 | ||
合作 | Successful projects require cooperation from all team members. | 成功的项目需要所有团队成员的合作。 | |
协作 | The collaboration between the departments led to innovative solutions. | 各部门之间的协作带来了创新的解决方案。 |
例句
1.During his interrogation he was blindfolded and beaten with cables until he passed out.
在审讯阶段,他被蒙住眼睛用钢鞭打到昏死过去。
2.Jack leaves the interrogation room and darts into an empty corridor.
杰克离开了审问室,快速地走到空无一人的走廊。
3.At the end, Karl Heinz was handed a transcript of the interrogation, in Russian.
最后,递给卡尔一个用俄语写的审问记录。
4.Under interrogation, he revealed all.
在审讯之下,他招供了一切。
5.In those under interrogation it can lead to confession.
在那些被审讯的人身上则迫使其招供。
6.Soon, he was called in for interrogation.
很快,他被叫进去审问。
7.But an interview is not an interrogation; it's a conversation.
但是面试并非是审问,而是一次交谈。
8.These days it is the intelligence agencies that find themselves under interrogation.
最近情报机构发现自己也面临着拷问。
9.The suspect is marched to the police station for interrogation.
嫌疑犯被押赴警察局听候讯问。
10.The police used various techniques during the interrogation to elicit a confession.
警方在审讯中使用了各种技巧来引导嫌疑人供认。
11.During the interrogation, the suspect remained calm and answered all questions.
在审讯期间,嫌疑人保持冷静,回答了所有问题。
12.The lawyer was present during the interrogation to ensure that the rights of the accused were protected.
律师在审讯期间在场,以确保被告的权利受到保护。
13.After hours of interrogation, the suspect finally confessed to the crime.
经过数小时的审讯,嫌疑人终于承认了罪行。
14.The detective conducted an interrogation to gather more information about the suspect's alibi.
侦探进行了审讯以获取更多关于嫌疑人不在场证明的信息。
作文
Interrogation is a term that often evokes feelings of tension and discomfort. It refers to the process of questioning someone, typically in a formal or systematic manner, to obtain information. In various contexts, such as law enforcement, military operations, or even in everyday situations, the method and approach to an interrogation (审问) can significantly influence the outcome of the information gathered. This essay will explore the nuances of interrogation (审问), its ethical implications, and its role in different fields.In the realm of law enforcement, interrogation (审问) is a crucial technique used by police officers to solve crimes. The effectiveness of an interrogation (审问) session can determine whether a suspect confesses or remains silent. Techniques employed during an interrogation (审问) can vary widely; some officers may use psychological tactics to build rapport with the suspect, while others might employ more aggressive methods. However, it is essential for law enforcement officials to adhere to ethical standards during an interrogation (审问). Coercive tactics or intimidation can lead to false confessions and undermine the justice system.Moreover, the legal implications of interrogation (审问) are significant. In many countries, individuals have the right to remain silent and to have legal representation during an interrogation (审问). This is designed to protect the rights of the accused and ensure that any information obtained is reliable and voluntary. The presence of a lawyer can also serve as a safeguard against potential abuses during the interrogation (审问) process. Thus, understanding the legal framework surrounding interrogation (审问) is vital for both law enforcement and individuals involved in legal proceedings.In addition to law enforcement, interrogation (审问) is also prevalent in military settings. Military interrogators are trained to extract vital information from detainees, often under high-pressure circumstances. The stakes in military interrogation (审问) can be incredibly high, as the information sought may pertain to national security. However, the ethical concerns surrounding military interrogation (审问) practices have sparked widespread debate. Incidents of torture and inhumane treatment have raised questions about the morality of certain interrogation (审问) techniques. International laws, such as the Geneva Conventions, aim to regulate how detainees should be treated, emphasizing the importance of humane treatment.In everyday scenarios, interrogation (审问) can take on a more informal tone. For instance, parents may engage in an interrogation (审问) of their children to understand their whereabouts or activities. Similarly, friends might question each other about personal matters. While these situations may lack the formal structure of police or military interrogation (审问), they still reflect the underlying human desire to seek truth and clarity.In conclusion, interrogation (审问) is a multifaceted concept that plays a critical role in various fields, from law enforcement to military operations and even personal relationships. Understanding the methods, ethical considerations, and legal frameworks surrounding interrogation (审问) is essential for ensuring that the pursuit of information does not compromise human rights or integrity. As society continues to evolve, so too must our approaches to interrogation (审问), balancing the need for information with respect for individual rights and dignity.
审问是一个常常引发紧张和不适感的术语。它指的是以正式或系统的方式对某人进行询问,以获取信息。在各种背景下,例如执法、军事行动,甚至日常情况,审问(interrogation)的方法和方式可以显著影响所获取信息的结果。本文将探讨审问(interrogation)的细微差别、伦理影响以及其在不同领域的作用。在执法领域,审问(interrogation)是警察用来破案的重要技术。审问(interrogation)会话的有效性可以决定嫌疑人是坦白还是保持沉默。在审问(interrogation)过程中使用的技巧差异很大;一些警官可能会使用心理战术与嫌疑人建立关系,而其他人可能会采取更具攻击性的方法。然而,执法官员在进行审问(interrogation)时必须遵守伦理标准。强迫性战术或恐吓可能导致虚假供述,从而破坏司法系统。此外,审问(interrogation)在法律上的影响也非常重要。在许多国家,个人有权保持沉默并在审问(interrogation)期间拥有法律代表。这旨在保护被告的权利,并确保获取的信息是可靠和自愿的。律师的在场也可以作为防止在审问(interrogation)过程中潜在滥用的保障。因此,理解围绕审问(interrogation)的法律框架对于执法人员和参与法律程序的个人来说至关重要。除了执法,审问(interrogation)在军事环境中也很普遍。军事审问者经过培训,以在高压情况下从被拘留者那里提取重要信息。在军事审问(interrogation)中,风险可能极高,因为所寻求的信息可能涉及国家安全。然而,围绕军事审问(interrogation)做法的伦理问题引发了广泛的辩论。酷刑和不人道待遇的事件引发了对某些审问(interrogation)技术道德性的质疑。国际法,如《日内瓦公约》,旨在规范对待被拘留者的方式,强调人道对待的重要性。在日常场景中,审问(interrogation)可以采取更非正式的语气。例如,父母可能会对孩子进行审问(interrogation),以了解他们的去向或活动。同样,朋友之间可能会互相询问个人事务。虽然这些情况可能缺乏执法或军事审问(interrogation)的正式结构,但它们仍然反映了人类对寻求真相和明确性的基本渴望。总之,审问(interrogation)是一个多方面的概念,在多个领域发挥着关键作用,从执法到军事行动,甚至个人关系。理解围绕审问(interrogation)的方法、伦理考虑和法律框架,对于确保信息的追求不妨碍人权或诚信至关重要。随着社会的不断发展,我们对审问(interrogation)的方法也必须不断演变,平衡获取信息的需要与对个人权利和尊严的尊重。