overregulation

简明释义

英[ˌəʊvəˈrɛɡjʊleɪʃən]美[ˌoʊvərˈrɛɡjʊˌleɪʃən]

n. 过度规律

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Overregulation in certain areas may also have played a role.

在某些领域，过度的控制也产生了一些影响。

2.Many claim the pressure to compete or the burden of overregulation drives company cultures to this point.

许多人都说，是竞争压力或过度监管带来的负担让企业文化变成了这样。

3.By contrast, subjects with major depressive disorder had overregulation of the amygdala in response to positive emotional stimuli, which might cause a reduced ability to respond to positive emotions.

相反，重性抑郁症的被试在反应积极情绪刺激上杏仁核过度调节。这可能引起反应积极情绪能力的降低。

4.So, contra Pearlstein, one reason that we haven’t had the environmental quality we have demanded is that overregulation has prevented private ownership.

因此，抵消pearlstein，我们还没有我们所需要的环境质量的原因之一过分监管而阻止私人拥有。

5.By contrast, subjects with major depressive disorder had overregulation of the amygdala in response to positive emotional stimuli, which might cause a reduced ability to respond to positive emotions.

相反，重性抑郁症的被试在反应积极情绪刺激上杏仁核过度调节。这可能引起反应积极情绪能力的降低。

6.The company faced challenges due to overregulation, which made it difficult to innovate.

由于过度监管，公司面临创新的困难。

7.The government is reviewing its policies to reduce overregulation that hampers business expansion.

政府正在审查其政策，以减少妨碍商业扩张的过度监管。

8.Critics of overregulation claim it creates unnecessary barriers for entrepreneurs.

批评过度监管的人声称它为企业家创造了不必要的障碍。

9.Many small businesses struggle to survive because of overregulation in their industries.

许多小企业因其行业内的过度监管而难以生存。

10.Advocates argue that overregulation stifles economic growth and job creation.

倡导者认为过度监管扼杀了经济增长和就业机会。

作文

In today's rapidly changing economic landscape, the concept of overregulation has become a significant topic of discussion among policymakers and business leaders. Overregulation refers to the excessive or unnecessary regulation imposed by government authorities that can stifle innovation, hinder growth, and create barriers for businesses. While regulations are essential for ensuring safety, protecting the environment, and maintaining fair market practices, too much regulation can lead to adverse effects that ultimately harm the economy and society as a whole.One of the primary concerns regarding overregulation is its impact on small businesses. Small enterprises often lack the resources and manpower to comply with complex regulatory requirements. When regulations become overly burdensome, these businesses may struggle to keep up, leading to increased operational costs and decreased competitiveness. For instance, a small manufacturing company may find it challenging to adhere to stringent environmental regulations, which could require expensive upgrades to equipment or processes. As a result, they may be forced to limit their production or even close down, leading to job losses and reduced economic activity in the community.Moreover, overregulation can stifle innovation. In industries such as technology and healthcare, where rapid advancements are crucial, excessive regulations can slow down the pace of development. Companies may hesitate to invest in new projects or research initiatives if they fear that regulatory compliance will consume too much time and resources. This hesitation can lead to missed opportunities for breakthroughs that could benefit society, such as life-saving medical treatments or groundbreaking technological innovations.Another critical aspect of overregulation is its tendency to create an uneven playing field. Larger corporations often have the financial means to navigate complex regulatory environments, while smaller firms may struggle. This disparity can lead to monopolistic practices, where big companies dominate the market simply because they can afford to comply with regulatory demands. Consequently, consumers may face fewer choices and higher prices, undermining the very purpose of regulation, which is to promote fair competition and protect consumer interests.To address the challenges posed by overregulation, it is essential for lawmakers to strike a balance between necessary oversight and promoting a healthy business environment. One approach could be to simplify existing regulations and eliminate those that are outdated or redundant. Streamlining the regulatory process can help reduce the burden on businesses while still achieving the intended goals of safety and fairness.Additionally, engaging with stakeholders, including business owners and industry experts, can provide valuable insights into the practical implications of regulations. By fostering open dialogue, policymakers can create regulations that are effective yet manageable, ensuring that they do not hinder economic growth or innovation.In conclusion, while regulations play a vital role in safeguarding public interests, overregulation can pose serious challenges to businesses and the economy. It is crucial for governments to recognize the fine line between necessary regulation and excessive control. By promoting a balanced regulatory environment, we can encourage entrepreneurship, foster innovation, and ultimately contribute to a more prosperous society.

在当今快速变化的经济环境中，过度监管的概念已成为政策制定者和商业领袖之间重要的讨论话题。过度监管是指政府当局施加的过度或不必要的监管，这可能会抑制创新、阻碍增长并为企业创造障碍。虽然监管对于确保安全、保护环境和维护公平市场实践至关重要，但过多的监管可能导致不利影响，从而最终损害经济和社会整体。关于过度监管的主要担忧之一是其对小企业的影响。小企业通常缺乏资源和人力来遵守复杂的监管要求。当监管变得过于繁重时，这些企业可能会难以跟上，导致运营成本增加和竞争力下降。例如，一家小型制造公司可能发现很难遵守严格的环境法规，这可能需要昂贵的设备或工艺升级。因此，他们可能被迫限制生产甚至关闭，导致失业和社区经济活动减少。此外，过度监管还可能抑制创新。在技术和医疗等行业，快速进步至关重要，过度的法规可能会减缓发展的步伐。如果公司担心合规性会消耗过多的时间和资源，他们可能会犹豫投资新项目或研究计划。这种犹豫可能导致错失突破性机会，这些机会本可以造福社会，例如拯救生命的医疗治疗或突破性的技术创新。过度监管的另一个关键方面是它倾向于造成不平等的竞争环境。大型企业通常有财力应对复杂的监管环境，而小型企业可能苦苦挣扎。这种差距可能导致垄断行为，大公司在市场上占据主导地位，仅仅因为它们能够承担监管要求。因此，消费者可能面临更少的选择和更高的价格，这破坏了监管的根本目的，即促进公平竞争和保护消费者利益。为了解决过度监管带来的挑战，立法者必须在必要的监督和促进健康的商业环境之间找到平衡。一种方法可能是简化现有的法规，消除那些过时或冗余的规定。简化监管流程可以帮助减少企业的负担，同时仍能实现安全和公平的目标。此外，与利益相关者（包括企业主和行业专家）进行交流，可以为法规的实际影响提供宝贵的见解。通过促进开放的对话，政策制定者可以制定有效但可管理的法规，确保它们不会阻碍经济增长或创新。总之，虽然法规在保护公众利益方面发挥着重要作用，但过度监管可能给企业和经济带来严重挑战。政府必须认识到必要监管和过度控制之间的微妙界限。通过促进平衡的监管环境，我们可以鼓励创业精神，促进创新，并最终为更加繁荣的社会做出贡献。