refutation

简明释义

英[ˌrefjuˈteɪʃ(ə)n]美[ˌrefjuˈteɪʃn]

n. （对观点、指责或理论的）驳斥，反驳

复 数 r e f u t a t i o n s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.What is decisive in the refutation of this view has already been said by Hegel, insofar as this was possible from an idealist standpoint;

对驳斥这一观点具有决定性的东西，凡是从唯心主义观点出发所能说的，黑格尔都已经说了；

2.In providing a point-by-point refutation of that review, a number of important clarifications were delineated.

在提供了逐篇驳斥这种评价，描绘了大量重要的阐明。

3.If my theory is wrong, a refutation is sufficient, and the one hundred zero is zero.

假如我的理论是错的，一个反驳就足够了，一百个零加起来还是零。

4.Holmes supposes the idea that comparative research should serve for educational decision-making in which policy-refutation is the most important way.

霍姆斯主张比较教育研究要为教育决策服务，而最重要的服务方式即政策证伪。

5.Some scientists hailed the study as a refutation of the claims made by climate sceptics during the Climategate saga.

一些科学家对该研究大为赞许，称其反驳了“气候门”事件期间气候怀疑论者提出的若干论断。

6.Refutation and explanation are useless, so I have ignored you.

所有的辩驳与解释都是多余的，因此我才不理会你。

7.Some modern rhetoricians advocate a dramatic, back-and-forth presentation of pros and cons rather than saving all the refutation for the last major body section.

某些现代修辞学家提倡一种颇具张力、前后交叉的正反辩论法，而不是把所有的反驳集中到最后的主要章节里。

8.Truth fears no refutation.

真理不怕人驳。

9.The scientist provided a thorough refutation of the previous study's claims.

这位科学家对之前研究的主张进行了全面的反驳。

10.The professor emphasized the importance of refutation in academic discourse.

教授强调了在学术讨论中反驳的重要性。

11.In her debate, she offered a strong refutation of the opposing argument.

在辩论中，她对对方的论点提出了有力的反驳。

12.His article included a detailed refutation of common misconceptions about climate change.

他的文章详细地对气候变化的常见误解进行了反驳。

13.The lawyer's refutation of the evidence was convincing and swayed the jury.

律师对证据的反驳令人信服，影响了陪审团。

作文

In the realm of academic discourse, the concept of refutation is crucial for the development of sound arguments and critical thinking. Refutation (反驳) refers to the process of disproving an argument or a claim by presenting evidence or reasoning that contradicts it. This practice not only strengthens one's own position but also enhances the overall quality of debate and discussion. To illustrate the importance of refutation in academic writing, consider a debate on climate change. One side may argue that human activities are the primary cause of global warming, while the opposing side might claim that natural factors are more significant. In this context, effective refutation involves systematically addressing the claims made by the opposition. A researcher could present data showing the correlation between industrial emissions and rising temperatures, thereby undermining the opposing argument. Furthermore, refutation is not limited to simply dismissing an argument; it requires a deep understanding of the topic at hand. For instance, if one were to argue against the effectiveness of renewable energy sources, it would be essential to provide empirical evidence demonstrating their viability and potential benefits. This could include statistics on the reduction of carbon footprints in regions that have adopted solar or wind energy. By doing so, the writer not only refutes the counterargument but also reinforces their own stance. Moreover, the skill of refutation extends beyond academic writing and into everyday life. In discussions with friends or family, being able to effectively refute false claims or misinformation can lead to more informed opinions and decisions. For example, when someone asserts that vaccines are harmful without scientific backing, a well-informed individual can respond with research findings that highlight the safety and efficacy of vaccines. This act of refutation (反驳) not only clarifies misconceptions but also promotes a culture of critical thinking and evidence-based reasoning. In conclusion, refutation is an essential component of effective communication and argumentation. Whether in academic settings or casual conversations, the ability to challenge and disprove opposing views fosters a deeper understanding of complex issues. By engaging in thoughtful refutation, individuals contribute to more robust discussions and ultimately advance knowledge within their communities. As we navigate an increasingly information-rich world, honing the skill of refutation will empower us to discern fact from fiction and make reasoned judgments about the issues that shape our lives.

在学术讨论的领域中，refutation（反驳）的概念对于建立合理的论点和批判性思维至关重要。Refutation指的是通过提出与其相矛盾的证据或推理来驳斥一个论点或主张的过程。这种做法不仅能增强自身立场的力量，还能提升辩论和讨论的整体质量。为了说明在学术写作中refutation的重要性，考虑一下关于气候变化的辩论。一方可能会争辩说人类活动是全球变暖的主要原因，而对方可能声称自然因素更为重要。在这种情况下，有效的refutation涉及系统地回应对方的主张。研究人员可以提供数据，显示工业排放与气温上升之间的相关性，从而削弱对方的论点。此外，refutation不仅仅限于简单地驳斥一个论点；它需要对所讨论的主题有深入的理解。例如，如果有人争论可再生能源的有效性，提供实证证据以证明其可行性和潜在好处将是至关重要的。这可能包括采用太阳能或风能的地区碳足迹减少的统计数据。通过这样做，作者不仅驳斥了反对论点，还强化了自己的立场。此外，refutation的技能不仅限于学术写作，还延伸到日常生活中。在与朋友或家人的讨论中，有效地驳斥虚假主张或错误信息的能力可以导致更明智的意见和决策。例如，当有人在没有科学依据的情况下声称疫苗有害时，一个知识渊博的人可以用研究结果回应，强调疫苗的安全性和有效性。这个refutation（反驳）的行为不仅澄清了误解，还促进了批判性思维和基于证据的推理的文化。总之，refutation是有效沟通和论证的重要组成部分。无论是在学术环境还是日常对话中，挑战和驳斥对立观点的能力都能促进对复杂问题的更深入理解。通过参与深思熟虑的refutation，个人为更强有力的讨论做出了贡献，并最终推动了社区内的知识进步。随着我们在一个信息丰富的世界中航行，磨练refutation的技能将使我们能够分辨事实与虚构，并对塑造我们生活的议题做出理性的判断。