sedition

简明释义

英[sɪˈdɪʃ(ə)n]美[sɪˈdɪʃn]

n. 暴动；煽动性的言论或行为；妨害治安

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.They sowed sedition broadcast over the country.

他们在全国广为散布煽动性言论。

2.Government officials charged him with sedition.

政府官员指控他煽动人们造反。

3.The ad hoc group ' s work, including identification of anonymous tribal customers, servers overseas website, and how will sedition act applications on the internet.

专案小组的工作包括鉴定匿名部落客、伺服器在海外的网站，并研究如何将煽动法令应用在网际网路。

4.He was brought to trial on charges of sedition.

他以煽动闹事罪被送法院审理。

5.The source revealed that the AD hoc group will examine the existing laws on sedition, and to explore how to extend to the Internet.

消息透露，专案小组将研究现有的煽动法令，并探讨如何将其延伸至互联网。

6.We have found this to be a pestilent man, and raising seditions among all the Jews throughout the world, and author of the sedition of the sect of the Nazarenes.

我们查出这人实在是个危险人物。他鼓动天下的一切犹太人作乱，又是纳匝肋教派的魁首。

7.Suddenly, the camp of the front a explode of sedition, my Pa killed a monster, the caption sees toward the front.

忽地，前方的阵营一阵骚动，我啪的打死了一个怪物，抬头朝着前面看去。

8.His speech was charged with sedition due to its inflammatory content.

由于其煽动性的内容，他的演讲被控以煽动叛乱。

9.The law prohibits any form of sedition that undermines national security.

法律禁止任何形式的煽动叛乱，以维护国家安全。

10.The government arrested several individuals for engaging in sedition.

政府逮捕了几名参与煽动叛乱的个人。

11.Activists were accused of sedition for opposing the new government policies.

活动人士因反对新政府政策而被指控煽动叛乱。

12.The pamphlet was deemed an act of sedition against the state.

这本小册子被视为对国家的煽动叛乱行为。

作文

Sedition, defined as conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state, has been a significant topic throughout history. Understanding the implications of sedition (煽动叛乱) is crucial for both citizens and governments alike. In many democratic societies, the balance between freedom of speech and maintaining public order is a delicate one. The concept of sedition (煽动叛乱) often arises in discussions about this balance, particularly when individuals express dissenting opinions that challenge governmental authority.Historically, sedition (煽动叛乱) has been used as a tool by those in power to suppress opposition. For instance, during the American Revolution, British authorities labeled revolutionary activities as sedition (煽动叛乱), attempting to stifle the growing desire for independence among the colonies. This historical context reveals how sedition (煽动叛乱) can be subjective; what one group views as a legitimate expression of dissent, another may see as a threat to stability.In modern times, the definition of sedition (煽动叛乱) continues to evolve. With the rise of social media, the spread of information—and misinformation—has made it increasingly difficult for governments to manage public discourse. For example, during protests, activists may use social media platforms to organize and disseminate their messages. Authorities may label some of these actions as sedition (煽动叛乱) if they believe these actions threaten national security or public order. This has led to debates about censorship and the limits of free speech.Moreover, laws regarding sedition (煽动叛乱) vary greatly from country to country. In some nations, strict sedition (煽动叛乱) laws are in place, leading to arrests and prosecutions of individuals who criticize the government. In contrast, other countries protect dissenting voices more robustly, viewing them as essential to a healthy democracy. This disparity raises questions about the role of sedition (煽动叛乱) in a society: Should it be punished, or should it be embraced as a vital part of political discourse?The implications of sedition (煽动叛乱) are profound. When individuals feel they cannot express their dissent without fear of retribution, it stifles not only their rights but also the potential for societal progress. History has shown that many significant changes arise from movements initially deemed sedition (煽动叛乱). Civil rights movements, anti-colonial struggles, and various forms of protest have often faced accusations of sedition (煽动叛乱) before ultimately leading to positive change.In conclusion, understanding sedition (煽动叛乱) requires a nuanced approach that considers historical context, the evolution of free speech, and the balance of power within society. While governments must maintain order, it is equally important to protect the rights of individuals to express dissent. This balance is essential for the health of any democracy. As we navigate the complexities of modern governance, the conversation around sedition (煽动叛乱) will undoubtedly continue to evolve, reflecting the ongoing struggle for freedom and justice in societies worldwide.

煽动叛乱，定义为激励人们反抗国家权威的行为或言论，在历史上一直是一个重要的话题。理解sedition（煽动叛乱）的含义对公民和政府同样至关重要。在许多民主社会中，言论自由与维护公共秩序之间的平衡是微妙的。sedition（煽动叛乱）这一概念常常出现在关于这种平衡的讨论中，特别是在个人表达异议意见挑战政府权威时。历史上，sedition（煽动叛乱）被当权者作为压制反对派的工具。例如，在美国独立战争期间，英国当局将革命活动标记为sedition（煽动叛乱），试图压制殖民地日益增长的独立愿望。这一历史背景揭示了sedition（煽动叛乱）的主观性；一个群体视为合法的反对表达，另一个可能将其视为对稳定的威胁。在现代，sedition（煽动叛乱）的定义继续演变。随着社交媒体的崛起，信息（以及错误信息）的传播使得政府越来越难以管理公共话语。例如，在抗议活动期间，活动人士可能利用社交媒体平台组织和传播他们的信息。如果当局认为这些行为威胁到国家安全或公共秩序，他们可能会将其中一些行为标记为sedition（煽动叛乱）。这引发了关于审查制度和言论自由界限的辩论。此外，关于sedition（煽动叛乱）的法律在不同国家之间差异很大。在某些国家，严格的sedition（煽动叛乱）法律导致因批评政府而被逮捕和起诉的人数增加。相反，其他国家更加强调保护异议声音，认为它们是健康民主的必要组成部分。这种差异引发了关于sedition（煽动叛乱）在社会中角色的问题：应该惩罚它，还是应该将其视为政治话语的重要组成部分？sedition（煽动叛乱）的影响深远。当个人感到无法表达异议而不必担心报复时，这不仅压制了他们的权利，也抑制了社会进步的潜力。历史表明，许多重大变化源于最初被视为sedition（煽动叛乱）的运动。民权运动、反殖民斗争以及各种形式的抗议活动往往在最终导致积极变化之前面临sedition（煽动叛乱）的指控。总之，理解sedition（煽动叛乱）需要一种细致入微的方法，考虑历史背景、言论自由的演变以及社会权力的平衡。虽然政府必须维护秩序，但同样重要的是保护个人表达异议的权利。这种平衡对任何民主的健康至关重要。在我们应对现代治理的复杂性时，围绕sedition（煽动叛乱）的讨论无疑将继续演变，反映出全球社会追求自由与正义的持续斗争。