inculpatory
简明释义
英[ɪnˈkʌlpətəri]美[ɪnˈkʌlpətəri]
adj. 使人负罪的;责难的
英英释义
Relating to or involving evidence or arguments that accuse or incriminate someone. | 与指控或使某人有罪的证据或论据有关。 |
单词用法
有罪证据 | |
有罪陈述 | |
提供有罪证据 | |
评估有罪信息 |
同义词
指控的 | The evidence presented was highly accusatory and left no room for doubt. | 提出的证据非常指控,毫无疑问。 | |
暗示的 | Her implicatory remarks suggested that he was involved in the crime. | 她的暗示性言论表明他与犯罪有关。 | |
定罪的 | 在他的办公室发现了定罪文件。 |
反义词
例句
1.At present, our country's the legislation and the fundamental research about the inculpatory act of rescue is imperfect, there still has many pending disputes and question needing to solve.
目前,我国关于攻击性紧急避险的立法及理论研究还不完善,仍有许多争议与问题有待解决。
2.In the inculpatory act of rescue which implements for other people's benefit, the key question should solve is how to deal with relation between emergency people and beneficiary.
在为他人利益实施的攻击性紧急避险中,应解决的关键问题是如何处理避险人与受益人的关系。
3.At present, our country's the legislation and the fundamental research about the inculpatory act of rescue is imperfect, there still has many pending disputes and question needing to solve.
目前,我国关于攻击性紧急避险的立法及理论研究还不完善,仍有许多争议与问题有待解决。
4.The inculpatory documents were crucial in securing a conviction.
这些归罪的文件对于确保定罪至关重要。
5.The jury was instructed to disregard any inculpatory remarks made outside the courtroom.
陪审团被指示忽略法庭外做出的任何归罪的言论。
6.During the trial, the prosecutor presented inculpatory statements from witnesses.
在审判中,检察官展示了证人提供的归罪的证词。
7.The defense attorney argued that the inculpatory evidence was obtained illegally.
辩护律师辩称这些归罪的证据是非法获得的。
8.The detective found several pieces of evidence that were clearly inculpatory.
侦探发现了几件明显是归罪的证据。
作文
In the realm of criminal justice, the term inculpatory refers to evidence or statements that suggest a person's guilt. Understanding this concept is crucial for both legal professionals and the general public. The role of inculpatory evidence in a trial can significantly influence the outcome, as it often serves as the foundation upon which a case is built. For instance, if a suspect's fingerprints are found at a crime scene, this inculpatory evidence can lead a jury to believe in the suspect's involvement in the crime. The importance of inculpatory evidence cannot be overstated. It is essential for prosecutors to present such evidence to establish a defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. However, the presence of inculpatory evidence alone is not sufficient for a conviction. Defense attorneys work diligently to challenge the validity of this evidence, seeking to introduce reasonable doubt into the minds of jurors. They may argue that the evidence was obtained unlawfully or that it does not directly link their client to the crime.Moreover, the concept of inculpatory evidence extends beyond physical proof; it also encompasses verbal statements. For example, a confession made by a suspect can be considered inculpatory. However, confessions must be scrutinized carefully, as they can sometimes be coerced or given under duress. This raises ethical questions about the methods used to obtain such statements and the reliability of the evidence presented in court.The distinction between inculpatory and exculpatory evidence is also vital in legal proceedings. While inculpatory evidence indicates guilt, exculpatory evidence serves to clear a defendant of blame. For instance, if a witness provides an alibi for the accused, this would be classified as exculpatory evidence. Both types of evidence play critical roles in ensuring a fair trial, highlighting the complexity of the legal system.In conclusion, the term inculpatory is a fundamental aspect of criminal law, representing evidence that suggests guilt. Its implications in the courtroom are profound, influencing the strategies employed by both prosecution and defense. As society continues to evolve, so too will the discussions surrounding inculpatory evidence, particularly with advancements in technology and forensic science. Understanding the nuances of this term not only aids in comprehending legal proceedings but also fosters a more informed public discourse on justice and accountability.
在刑事司法领域,术语inculpatory指的是表明一个人有罪的证据或陈述。理解这一概念对于法律专业人士和公众来说至关重要。inculpatory证据在审判中的作用可以显著影响结果,因为它通常构成案件的基础。例如,如果在犯罪现场发现了嫌疑人的指纹,这一inculpatory证据可能会使陪审团相信嫌疑人参与了该犯罪。inculpatory证据的重要性不容小觑。检察官必须提出此类证据,以确立被告的罪行超出合理怀疑的标准。然而,仅仅存在inculpatory证据并不足以定罪。辩护律师努力挑战这些证据的有效性,试图在陪审团心中引入合理怀疑。他们可能会争辩称,证据是非法获取的,或者它并没有直接将他们的客户与犯罪联系起来。此外,inculpatory证据的概念不仅限于物理证据;它还包括口头陈述。例如,嫌疑人所作的供述可以被视为inculpatory。然而,供述必须经过仔细审查,因为它们有时可能是在胁迫下获得的或在压力下作出的。这引发了关于获取此类陈述的方法及其在法庭上呈现的证据可靠性的伦理问题。在法律程序中,inculpatory证据与免责证据之间的区别也至关重要。虽然inculpatory证据表明有罪,但免责证据则用于清除被告的指责。例如,如果一名证人为被告提供了不在场证明,这将被归类为免责证据。这两种类型的证据在确保公正审判中发挥着关键作用,突显了法律系统的复杂性。总之,术语inculpatory是刑法的一个基本方面,代表着暗示有罪的证据。它在法庭上的含义深远,影响着检方和辩方所采用的策略。随着社会的不断发展,围绕inculpatory证据的讨论也将不断演变,特别是在技术和法医学的发展背景下。理解这一术语的微妙之处不仅有助于理解法律程序,还促进了公众对正义和问责制的更深入讨论。