verdicts

简明释义

英[ˈvɜːdɪkts]美[ˈvɜrdɪkts]

n. 裁决（verdict 的复数）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.She kept hundreds of copies of court verdicts, piled high, until her death.

她保留了无数的法院裁定书，高束藏起，直至去逝。

2.These verdicts have broken and shattered him and our family in so many ways.

裁决已经在很多方面摧毁了他以及我们全家人。

3.At present, dissenting opinion loses its due place in the process of making court verdicts.

目前，在法院审判案件过程中，反对意见缺乏应有的舞台。

4.The common methods often verdicts interference signal as useful single so affect efficiency of laser lidar.

采用一般方法常将干扰信号判断成有用信号，从而影响了激光雷达的工作能力。

5.Juries nearly always render verdicts with which I agree.

陪审团几乎总是作出我赞同的裁决。

6.It used to be only movies, now even verdicts are out before the official release.

过去只有电影会这样，现在法院的判决也可以在官方宣布之前被泄露了。

7.Many people were shocked by the verdicts in the high-profile trial.

许多人对这个引人注目的审判中的裁决感到震惊。

8.The jury delivered their verdicts after a long deliberation.

陪审团在长时间的审议后作出了他们的裁决。

9.The judge explained the implications of the verdicts to the defendants.

法官向被告解释了裁决的含义。

10.The verdicts were published in the local newspaper the next day.

第二天，裁决被刊登在当地报纸上。

11.In the court case, the verdicts were unanimous, leading to a swift sentencing.

在这个法庭案件中，裁决是一致的，导致了迅速的判刑。

作文

In the realm of law and justice, the term verdicts refers to the formal decisions made by a jury or judge regarding the outcome of a trial. These verdicts are crucial as they determine the fate of individuals accused of crimes and have far-reaching implications for society. Understanding the nature of verdicts is essential not only for legal professionals but also for citizens who wish to grasp the workings of their judicial system. A verdict can be classified into two primary types: guilty and not guilty. A guilty verdict signifies that the jury or judge has found sufficient evidence to convict the defendant of the charges brought against them. This decision often leads to sentencing, where the judge imposes a punishment that reflects the severity of the crime. On the other hand, a not guilty verdict indicates that the prosecution failed to meet its burden of proof, and the defendant is presumed innocent. This principle of 'innocent until proven guilty' is a cornerstone of many judicial systems around the world.The process of reaching a verdict involves meticulous examination of evidence presented during the trial. Jurors are tasked with deliberating over the facts, witness testimonies, and any relevant legal standards before arriving at their conclusion. This process underscores the importance of a fair trial, where all parties have the opportunity to present their case. The integrity of verdicts is paramount, as they reflect the collective judgment of a group of individuals who have carefully considered all aspects of the case.Moreover, verdicts can also influence public perception of justice and the legal system. High-profile cases often draw significant media attention, and the resulting verdicts can lead to public outcry or support, depending on the outcome. For instance, a verdict that acquits a defendant in a controversial case may spark debates about systemic issues within the judicial system, such as racial bias or the effectiveness of legal representation. Conversely, a guilty verdict can bring a sense of closure to victims and their families, reinforcing the belief that justice has been served.In addition to their immediate impact, verdicts can also set precedents for future cases. Legal principles established through verdicts can influence how similar cases are adjudicated in the future, shaping the evolution of law over time. This aspect highlights the dynamic nature of the legal system, where verdicts contribute to the ongoing dialogue about justice, rights, and societal values.Ultimately, the significance of verdicts extends beyond the courtroom. They are a reflection of societal norms and values, embodying the collective conscience of a community. As citizens, it is our responsibility to understand the implications of verdicts and engage in discussions about justice and fairness. By doing so, we contribute to a more informed society that holds its legal system accountable and strives for continuous improvement. In conclusion, verdicts play a pivotal role in the judicial process, serving as the culmination of legal proceedings and a testament to the pursuit of justice. Their impact resonates throughout society, reminding us of the importance of fairness, integrity, and the rule of law.

在法律和正义的领域中，术语verdicts指的是陪审团或法官对审判结果所做出的正式决定。这些verdicts至关重要，因为它们决定了被控犯罪的个人的命运，并对社会产生深远的影响。理解verdicts的性质不仅对法律专业人士至关重要，也对希望掌握司法系统运作的公民至关重要。verdicts可以分为两种主要类型：有罪和无罪。有罪的verdict意味着陪审团或法官发现有足够的证据来判定被告有罪。这一决定通常会导致判刑，法官根据犯罪的严重程度施加惩罚。另一方面，无罪的verdict表示检方未能满足其举证责任，被告被假定为无罪。这个“无罪推定”的原则是世界许多司法系统的基石。达成verdicts的过程涉及对审判期间提出的证据的细致审查。陪审员的任务是对事实、证人证词以及任何相关的法律标准进行审议，然后得出结论。这个过程强调了公正审判的重要性，在这里所有各方都有机会提出自己的案件。verdicts的完整性至关重要，因为它们反映了一群经过仔细考虑案件各个方面的个人的集体判断。此外，verdicts还可以影响公众对正义和法律系统的看法。高调案件往往会引起媒体的广泛关注，随之而来的verdicts可能导致公众的抗议或支持，具体取决于结果。例如，在一个有争议的案件中宣告被告无罪的verdict可能会引发关于司法系统内系统性问题的辩论，比如种族偏见或法律代理的有效性。相反，有罪的verdict可以给受害者及其家属带来一种结束感，强化正义已得到伸张的信念。除了其直接影响外，verdicts还可以为未来的案件设定先例。通过verdicts确立的法律原则可以影响未来类似案件的裁决，塑造法律随时间演变的过程。这一方面突显了法律系统的动态特性，在这里，verdicts有助于关于正义、权利和社会价值的持续对话。最终，verdicts的重要性超越了法庭。它们是社会规范和价值观的反映，体现了社区的集体良知。作为公民，我们有责任理解verdicts的含义，并参与关于正义和公平的讨论。通过这样做，我们为一个更加知情的社会贡献力量，使其对法律系统负责，并努力实现持续改进。总之，verdicts在司法过程中扮演着关键角色，作为法律程序的高潮和追求正义的见证。它们的影响在整个社会中回响，提醒我们公平、诚信和法治的重要性。