lobbying

简明释义

英[ˈlɒbiɪŋ]美[ˈlɑːbiɪŋ]

adj. 游说

v. 进行游说（lobby 的现在分词）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Anyone who knows the Clintons knows that lobbying will do no good.

任何了解克林顿家族的人都知道游说是一点儿用也顶不上的。

2.The country has been lobbying hard against the ban for some time.

该国一段时间以来都为反对禁令而竭力游说各方。

3.Another senior aide left Mr McCain's team because of lobbying.

另一高级助手因游说问题离开麦凯恩的竞选团队。

4.Lobbying on all sides has intensified.

各方面都在积极游说。

5.It can mean lobbying and forming associations.

它有游说和组成团体的意思。

6.In some American cities, peer-to-peer taxi services have been banned after lobbying by traditional taxi firms.

在一些美国城市，点对点的出租车服务在传统出租车公司游说后被禁止。

7.The company is investing heavily in lobbying to influence new regulations.

这家公司正在大力投资于游说以影响新法规。

8.Environmental groups are lobbying for stricter pollution controls.

环保组织正在游说以要求更严格的污染控制。

9.The lobbying efforts of the tech industry have led to favorable legislation.

科技行业的游说努力促成了有利的立法。

10.Many citizens are concerned about corporate lobbying in politics.

许多公民对企业在政治中的游说感到担忧。

11.She spent years in lobbying for healthcare reform.

她花了多年时间在游说医疗改革。

作文

In modern democracies, the term lobbying refers to the act of attempting to influence the decisions of government officials, most often legislators or members of regulatory agencies. This practice has become a significant aspect of political life, as various interest groups, corporations, and non-profit organizations seek to sway public policy in their favor. While lobbying can be seen as a legitimate way for citizens and organizations to voice their concerns and advocate for specific issues, it also raises questions about the ethics and transparency of political processes.One of the primary functions of lobbying is to ensure that lawmakers are informed about the potential impacts of legislation. For example, when a new bill is introduced that could affect the environment, environmental groups may engage in lobbying to present scientific data and advocate for sustainable practices. On the other hand, businesses affected by such regulations might also employ lobbyists to argue against stringent measures that could impact their operations. This dynamic creates a complex interplay between various interests, where each side attempts to make its case heard.However, the practice of lobbying is not without its controversies. Critics argue that it often leads to unequal representation in the political arena, as wealthier organizations can afford to hire professional lobbyists to push their agendas. This financial advantage can result in a disproportionate influence on policy outcomes, undermining the democratic principle of equal representation. Furthermore, the lack of transparency in lobbying activities can foster corruption and mistrust among the public.To address these concerns, many countries have implemented regulations to govern lobbying activities. For instance, in the United States, lobbyists are required to register with the government and disclose their activities, including the amount of money spent on lobbying. These measures aim to promote transparency and hold lobbyists accountable for their actions. Nonetheless, enforcement of these regulations can be challenging, and loopholes often exist that allow unethical practices to continue.The role of technology in lobbying has also evolved significantly in recent years. With the rise of social media and digital communication, interest groups can now reach a broader audience and mobilize support more effectively than ever before. Online campaigns can amplify messages and create pressure on lawmakers to respond to constituents' demands. This shift has made lobbying more accessible to grassroots movements, allowing ordinary citizens to participate in the political process.Ultimately, lobbying is a multifaceted phenomenon that plays a crucial role in shaping public policy. While it provides a platform for diverse voices to be heard, it also presents challenges related to equity and transparency. As societies continue to grapple with these issues, it is essential to strike a balance between the right to advocate for one's interests and the need for a fair and transparent political system. By fostering an environment where all voices can be heard, we can work towards a more inclusive democracy that serves the interests of all citizens, not just those with the resources to engage in lobbying activities.

在现代民主国家中，术语游说指的是试图影响政府官员的决策的行为，通常是立法者或监管机构的成员。这一做法已成为政治生活的重要组成部分，因为各种利益集团、企业和非营利组织试图在公共政策上施加影响以符合他们的利益。虽然游说可以被视为公民和组织表达关切并倡导特定问题的合法方式，但它也引发了关于政治过程的伦理和透明度的问题。游说的主要功能之一是确保立法者了解立法潜在影响。例如，当一项新法案被提出可能影响环境时，环保组织可能会参与游说以呈现科学数据并倡导可持续实践。另一方面，受此类法规影响的企业也可能雇佣游说者来反对可能影响其运营的严格措施。这种动态在各种利益之间创造了复杂的互动，各方都试图让自己的声音被听到。然而，游说的做法并非没有争议。批评者认为，它往往导致政治舞台上的不平等代表，因为更富有的组织能够负担得起专业游说者来推动他们的议程。这种财务优势可能导致政策结果的不成比例影响，破坏了公平代表的民主原则。此外，游说活动缺乏透明度可能助长腐败和公众的不信任。为了应对这些问题，许多国家实施了监管措施来管理游说活动。例如，在美国，游说者需要向政府注册并披露他们的活动，包括在游说上花费的金额。这些措施旨在促进透明度并使游说者对其行为负责。然而，这些规定的执行可能具有挑战性，往往存在漏洞，使不道德的做法继续存在。近年来，技术在游说中的角色也发生了显著变化。随着社交媒体和数字通信的兴起，利益集团现在可以比以往更有效地接触更广泛的受众并动员支持。在线活动可以放大信息并对立法者施加压力，促使他们回应选民的需求。这一转变使得游说对基层运动更加可及，使普通公民能够参与政治过程。归根结底，游说是一个多方面的现象，在塑造公共政策中发挥着至关重要的作用。虽然它为多样化的声音提供了发声的平台，但它也带来了与公平和透明度相关的挑战。随着社会继续努力解决这些问题，必须在倡导个人利益的权利和公平透明的政治体系之间取得平衡。通过营造一个所有声音都能被听到的环境，我们可以朝着一个更具包容性的民主迈进，服务于所有公民的利益，而不仅仅是那些有资源参与游说活动的人。