wronger

简明释义

英[/ˈrɒŋ.ər/]美[/ˈrɔːŋər/]

错误的

有毛病的

不合适的

不道德的（wrong 的比较级）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Something seems wrong, and over time, it feels wronger and wronger.

似乎有东西不对劲，长期下来，感到越来越不对劲。

2.Something seems wrong, and over time, it feels wronger and wronger.

似乎有东西不对劲，长期下来，感到越来越不对劲。

3.After reviewing the evidence, the jury found him to be the wronger in the case.

在审查证据后，陪审团发现他在这个案件中是错误者。

4.She was upset because she believed he was the wronger in their relationship.

她很生气，因为她认为他在他们的关系中是错误者。

5.I don't want to point fingers, but he seems to be the wronger of us all.

我不想指责别人，但他似乎是我们所有人中最错误者。

6.When it comes to who started the fight, it's clear that he was the wronger.

在谁开始打斗这件事上，很明显他是错误者。

7.In this argument, I feel like you are the wronger in this situation.

在这场争论中，我觉得你是这个情况中的错误者。

作文

In our daily lives, we often encounter situations that test our moral compass. One of the most intriguing concepts is the idea of being 'wronger' than someone else in a given context. The term 'wronger' refers to the comparative state of having made a more significant mistake or having acted in a more unethical manner than another person. This notion can be particularly relevant when discussing ethical dilemmas, where decisions are not always black and white. For instance, consider a scenario where two friends, Alice and Bob, find themselves in a disagreement over a business deal. Alice believes that the deal is beneficial, while Bob thinks it is a scam. If Alice goes ahead with the deal despite knowing it might harm Bob, she could be considered the 'wronger' in this situation. In this case, her actions have not only affected her own interests but have also jeopardized Bob's well-being. The concept of 'wronger' becomes even more complex when we introduce the idea of intent. If Alice genuinely believed that the deal was advantageous and acted without malice, the question arises: was she truly the 'wronger'? This highlights the importance of understanding context and intent when labeling someone as the 'wronger'. Furthermore, societal norms play a crucial role in determining who is considered the 'wronger'. Different cultures have varying standards of morality, which can lead to conflicting perceptions of right and wrong. For example, in some cultures, prioritizing family over business is seen as virtuous, while in others, it may be viewed as irresponsible. Therefore, the label of 'wronger' can shift depending on the cultural lens through which we view the situation. Additionally, the concept of being the 'wronger' can extend beyond individual actions to encompass systemic issues. For instance, in discussions about social justice, we often examine who is the 'wronger' in situations of inequality or discrimination. In these cases, the focus shifts from individual actions to collective responsibility. For example, if a corporation exploits its workers, the question of who is the 'wronger' becomes more complicated. Is it the CEO who makes the decisions, the shareholders who profit, or the society that allows such practices to continue? These questions challenge us to think critically about accountability and the broader implications of our actions. Ultimately, recognizing who is the 'wronger' in any given situation requires a nuanced understanding of morality, context, and intent. It encourages us to reflect on our own actions and consider how they impact others. By examining these dynamics, we can foster a more empathetic and just society. In conclusion, the term 'wronger' serves as a reminder of the complexities of human behavior and the moral choices we face. It urges us to be mindful of our actions and their consequences, both for ourselves and for those around us. As we navigate the intricate web of relationships and decisions in our lives, let us strive to be aware of the potential to be the 'wronger' and work towards making choices that promote fairness and integrity.

在我们的日常生活中，我们经常遇到考验道德指南针的情境。一个最引人入胜的概念是，在特定背景下被称为“更错”的想法。术语“更错”指的是相较于他人，犯了更重大错误或以更不道德的方式行事的比较状态。当讨论伦理困境时，这一概念尤其相关，因为决策并不总是非黑即白的。例如，考虑一个场景，其中两个朋友，爱丽丝和鲍勃，就一笔商业交易发生分歧。爱丽丝认为这笔交易是有利的，而鲍勃则认为这是一个骗局。如果爱丽丝在知道可能会伤害鲍勃的情况下仍然推进交易，她在这种情况下可能被视为“更错”。在这种情况下，她的行为不仅影响了自己的利益，还危及了鲍勃的福祉。“更错”的概念在我们引入意图的想法时变得更加复杂。如果爱丽丝真的相信这笔交易是有利的，并且没有恶意地行动，那么问题就出现了：她真的算是“更错”吗？这突显了在标记某人为“更错”时理解上下文和意图的重要性。此外，社会规范在确定谁被认为是“更错”的角色中也发挥着至关重要的作用。不同文化对道德的标准各不相同，这可能导致对对与错的冲突看法。例如，在某些文化中，优先考虑家庭而不是商业被视为美德，而在其他文化中，这可能被视为不负责任。因此，“更错”的标签可以根据我们观察情况的文化视角而转移。此外，成为“更错”的概念可以超越个人行为，涵盖系统性问题。例如，在讨论社会正义时，我们常常审视在不平等或歧视情况下谁是“更错”。在这些情况下，焦点从个人行为转向集体责任。例如，如果一家企业剥削其工人，谁是“更错”的问题变得更为复杂。是做出决定的首席执行官，还是从中获利的股东，抑或是允许这种做法继续的社会？这些问题挑战我们批判性地思考问责制以及我们行为的更广泛影响。最终，认识到在任何特定情况下谁是“更错”的人需要对道德、上下文和意图进行细致的理解。它鼓励我们反思自己的行为，并考虑这些行为对他人的影响。通过审视这些动态，我们可以促进一个更具同情心和公正的社会。总之，术语“更错”提醒我们人类行为的复杂性和我们面临的道德选择。它促使我们关注自己的行为及其后果，无论是对自己还是对周围的人。在我们在人际关系和生活决策的错综复杂中导航时，让我们努力意识到成为“更错”的潜力，并致力于做出促进公平和诚信的选择。