surtaxes

简明释义

英[ˈsɜːtæksɪz]美[ˈsɜrˌtæksɪz]

[税收] 附加税

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Small business owners in particular are concerned that new federal income surtaxes may take too big a chomp out of profitability.

特别是小企业主担心，新的联邦收入附加税可能采取的盈利太大的咬牙了。

2.Small business owners in particular are concerned that new federal income surtaxes may take too big a chomp out of profitability.

特别是小企业主担心，新的联邦收入附加税可能采取的盈利太大的咬牙了。

3.The proposal includes a series of surtaxes aimed at reducing carbon emissions.

该提案包括一系列旨在减少碳排放的附加税。

4.Many businesses are concerned about the potential surtaxes that could affect their profitability.

许多企业担心可能影响其盈利能力的附加税。

5.Residents were unhappy with the surtaxes added to their property taxes last year.

居民对去年增加到他们财产税上的附加税感到不满。

6.To combat wealth inequality, the city council decided to implement surtaxes on luxury goods.

为了打击财富不平等，市议会决定对奢侈品实施附加税。

7.The government imposed new surtaxes on high-income earners to fund social programs.

政府对高收入者征收新的附加税以资助社会项目。

作文

In recent years, the topic of taxation has become increasingly relevant in discussions about economic policy and social justice. One term that often comes up in these discussions is surtaxes, which refers to additional taxes imposed on top of existing tax rates. These extra charges are typically levied on higher income brackets or specific categories of goods and services. The purpose of surtaxes is often to address income inequality, fund public services, or manage economic imbalances. The debate surrounding surtaxes is multifaceted. Proponents argue that they are a necessary tool for redistributing wealth and ensuring that those who can afford to contribute more do so. For instance, in many countries, surtaxes on high earners can help finance education, healthcare, and infrastructure projects that benefit society as a whole. By imposing these additional taxes, governments aim to create a fairer system where everyone contributes according to their means.On the other hand, critics of surtaxes contend that they can discourage investment and economic growth. High-income individuals and corporations may feel disincentivized to invest in businesses or expand their operations if they know that a significant portion of their earnings will be taxed at a higher rate. This could lead to a decrease in job creation and overall economic activity, ultimately harming the very communities that surtaxes are intended to help.Furthermore, there is the argument that surtaxes can lead to tax evasion or avoidance strategies. Wealthy individuals may hire accountants and financial advisors to find loopholes or offshore accounts to minimize their tax liabilities. This not only undermines the effectiveness of surtaxes but also creates a perception of unfairness among those who do not have the same resources to navigate the tax system.Another consideration is the administrative complexity that surtaxes can introduce into the tax code. As governments add layers of taxation, it can become increasingly difficult for taxpayers to understand their obligations. This complexity can lead to compliance issues and increased costs for both taxpayers and tax authorities. Simplifying the tax system while still ensuring that surtaxes are effectively implemented is a challenge that policymakers must grapple with.In conclusion, surtaxes represent a contentious aspect of modern taxation debates. While they can serve important purposes in promoting equity and funding essential services, they also raise concerns about economic growth, tax evasion, and administrative burdens. Striking the right balance between fairness and efficiency is crucial for any government considering the implementation of surtaxes. As societies continue to evolve, the discussion around these additional taxes will likely persist, necessitating careful consideration of their implications for all stakeholders involved.

近年来，税收的话题在经济政策和社会公正的讨论中变得越来越相关。一个经常出现在这些讨论中的术语是surtaxes，指的是在现有税率上征收的额外税。这些额外的费用通常对高收入阶层或特定类别的商品和服务征收。surtaxes的目的通常是解决收入不平等、资助公共服务或管理经济失衡。围绕surtaxes的辩论是多方面的。支持者认为，它们是重新分配财富和确保能够承担更多的人做出贡献的必要工具。例如，在许多国家，对高收入者的surtaxes可以帮助资助教育、医疗保健和基础设施项目，这些项目惠及整个社会。通过征收这些额外的税，政府旨在创造一个更公平的系统，让每个人根据自己的能力做出贡献。另一方面，批评者认为，surtaxes可能会抑制投资和经济增长。如果高收入个人和企业知道他们的大部分收入将以更高的税率征税，他们可能会感到没有动力去投资业务或扩大经营。这可能导致就业机会减少和整体经济活动下降，最终伤害到那些surtaxes旨在帮助的社区。此外，还有一个观点认为，surtaxes可能导致逃税或避税策略。富裕个人可能雇佣会计师和财务顾问来寻找漏洞或离岸账户，以最小化他们的税收负担。这不仅破坏了surtaxes的有效性，还在那些没有同样资源来应对税收体系的人中造成了不公平的印象。另一个考虑因素是，surtaxes可能给税法带来的行政复杂性。随着政府增加税收层次，纳税人可能会越来越难以理解他们的义务。这种复杂性可能导致合规问题，并增加纳税人和税务机关的成本。在确保有效实施surtaxes的同时简化税收制度，是政策制定者必须面对的挑战。总之，surtaxes代表了现代税收辩论中的一个有争议的方面。虽然它们在促进公平和资助基本服务方面可以发挥重要作用，但它们也引发了关于经济增长、逃税和行政负担的担忧。对于任何考虑实施surtaxes的政府来说，找到公平与效率之间的正确平衡至关重要。随着社会的不断发展，围绕这些额外税收的讨论可能会持续下去，因此需要仔细考虑它们对所有相关方的影响。