wrangling

简明释义

英[ˈræŋɡlɪŋ]美[ˈræŋɡlɪŋ]

v. 争吵，争辩；驱拢，看管（牲口）（wrangle 的现在分词）

复 数 w r a n g l i n g s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The wrangling may even cause the deal to collapse.

这种争吵也许甚至会导致协议流产。

2.The ensuing wrangling over every toy will resonate with both sides in any household, as will the surprise ending.

对每件玩具不可避免的争吵都会在每个家庭的双方引起共鸣，就像本书出人意料的结尾。

3.Smaller countries which do would worry about being bullied. And more institutional wrangling would hardly restore market confidence.

但不使用欧元的欧盟国家可能因此担心沦为二等国家，一些小国担心受到欺侮，机构之间的争执增多，市场信心很难恢复。

4.After years of wrangling, there is still no framework elections law.

争吵多年后，仍没有一部框架性的选举法。

5.We're going to assume you're a savvy user, but a newb when it comes to wrangling code snippets, so we'll keep things at the beginner level.

我先假设你是一个悟性很强的读者，但对于新手，当我谈论程序代码时还是要按照入门级的水平。

6.Before you start wrangling background processes, take a moment to find out which ones are causing the biggest hardware drain.

在处理进程的生杀大权之前要先揪出后台最占用系统资源的进程。

7.This puts Marshall's estate back into play, and ensures that bitter legal wrangling will stretch on for years.

这就使得马歇尔的财产再度陷入纠葛之中，接下来肯定又是持续数年的激烈的法律纷争。

8.Since his retirement in August, the wrangling has intensified.

自从八月他退役以后，争论也变得更加激烈。

9."Were these parties wrangling over a railway station about to give the same answer?"

为一个铁路车站而争吵不休的各方将会给出相同的回答吗？

10.The team spent hours in wrangling 争论 over the budget allocation for the project.

团队花了几个小时在预算分配上进行争论。

11.There was a lot of wrangling 争论 between the two departments about the responsibilities.

两个部门之间关于职责有很多争论。

12.The wrangling 争吵 over the merger details delayed the final agreement.

关于合并细节的争吵延迟了最终协议的达成。

13.The legal wrangling 争斗 over the property rights took several months to resolve.

关于财产权的法律争斗持续了几个月才解决。

14.After much wrangling 争执, they finally reached a consensus on the new policy.

经过多次争执，他们终于就新政策达成了一致。

作文

In the world of politics, wrangling (争吵) is often an inevitable part of the process. Politicians engage in intense discussions and debates, sometimes leading to heated arguments that can last for hours. This wrangling (争吵) is not merely a display of disagreement; it serves a purpose in the democratic system where multiple viewpoints must be considered. Each party tries to advocate for their stance while attempting to sway public opinion and influence legislative outcomes. One notable example of wrangling (争吵) occurred during the negotiations for a significant healthcare reform bill. Different factions within the government had varying opinions on how to structure the policy, leading to days of wrangling (争吵) among lawmakers. The discussions were often contentious, with each side presenting their arguments passionately, highlighting the importance of their proposed changes. Despite the challenges, this wrangling (争吵) is essential for democracy. It ensures that all voices are heard, and compromises can be reached. While it may seem chaotic at times, this process ultimately leads to more comprehensive and well-rounded policies. When different perspectives clash, it forces individuals to think critically and consider alternative solutions. However, wrangling (争吵) is not confined to politics alone. In everyday life, people often find themselves in situations where disagreements arise. Whether it’s a discussion about family matters, workplace issues, or even casual conversations among friends, wrangling (争吵) can occur. These disputes can lead to misunderstandings and tension, but they also provide opportunities for growth and understanding. For instance, when friends disagree over where to go for dinner, their wrangling (争吵) might seem trivial. Yet, through this process, they learn to communicate their preferences and negotiate a solution that satisfies everyone. This kind of wrangling (争吵) can strengthen relationships by fostering open dialogue and encouraging compromise. In conclusion, wrangling (争吵) is a natural part of human interaction that occurs in various settings, from political arenas to personal relationships. While it can be challenging and sometimes uncomfortable, it plays a crucial role in facilitating communication and understanding. Embracing wrangling (争吵) as a constructive tool rather than viewing it solely as a negative experience can lead to better outcomes in both public and private spheres. Ultimately, the ability to engage in healthy wrangling (争吵) can enhance our decision-making processes and contribute to more effective collaboration.

在政治世界中，wrangling（争吵）往往是一个不可避免的过程。政治家们进行激烈的讨论和辩论，有时会导致长达数小时的激烈争论。这种wrangling（争吵）不仅仅是不同意见的表现；它在民主制度中发挥着作用，必须考虑多种观点。每个政党都试图倡导他们的立场，同时试图影响公众舆论和立法结果。一个显著的例子是，在重大医疗改革法案的谈判过程中发生的wrangling（争吵）。政府内的不同派系对政策的结构有不同的看法，导致立法者之间进行了几天的wrangling（争吵）。讨论往往是有争议的，各方热情地提出自己的论点，强调他们提议的变更的重要性。尽管面临挑战，这种wrangling（争吵）对于民主制度至关重要。它确保所有声音都被听到，并且可以达成妥协。虽然有时看起来混乱，但这一过程最终会导致更全面、更周全的政策。当不同的观点发生冲突时，它迫使人们进行批判性思考并考虑替代解决方案。然而，wrangling（争吵）并不仅限于政治。在日常生活中，人们经常发现自己处于分歧的情况下。无论是关于家庭事务、工作场所问题，还是朋友之间的随意对话，wrangling（争吵）都可能发生。这些争端可能导致误解和紧张，但它们也提供了成长和理解的机会。例如，当朋友们就去哪里吃晚餐意见不合时，他们的wrangling（争吵）可能看起来微不足道。然而，通过这个过程，他们学会了沟通自己的偏好并协商出一个让每个人满意的解决方案。这种类型的wrangling（争吵）可以通过促进开放的对话和鼓励妥协来增强关系。总之，wrangling（争吵）是人类互动的自然部分，发生在各种环境中，从政治舞台到个人关系。虽然它可能具有挑战性，有时也令人不适，但它在促进沟通和理解方面发挥着至关重要的作用。将wrangling（争吵）视为一种建设性的工具，而不是单纯将其视为消极体验，可以在公共和私人领域带来更好的结果。最终，能够进行健康的wrangling（争吵）可以增强我们的决策过程并促进更有效的合作。