vilify

简明释义

英[ˈvɪlɪfaɪ]美[ˈvɪlɪfaɪ]

vt. 诽谤；中伤；轻视；贬低

第 三 人 称 单 数 v i l i f i e s

现 在 分 词 v i l i f y i n g

过 去 式 v i l i f i e d

过 去 分 词 v i l i f i e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them. But the only thing you can't do is ignore them. Because they change things.

你可以赞美他们，引用他们，反对他们，质疑他们，颂扬或是诋毁他们，但唯独不能漠视他们。

2.Classics aggressively expands customer relations and will not vilify rivals or never reveal customer information and commercial secrets.

经典积极进取地拓展客户关系，绝不诋毁竞争对手，也决不对外泄露客户资料及公司商业秘密。

3.Glorify or vilify?

赞美还是诽谤？

4.You can praise them, disagree with them, quote them, disbelieve them, glorify or vilify them.

你可以赞美他们，否定他们，响应他们，置疑他们，颂扬他们甚至诋毁他们。

5.You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them.

你可以引用他们、不同意他们、赞颂或丑化他们。

6.No matter how much western MSM try to vilify Duterte he is certainly very much loved and admired in Philippines.

无论西方主流媒体如何试图诋毁杜特尔特，他在菲律宾确实很受人爱戴和敬仰。

7.You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them.

你尽可以引用他们，否定他们，赞美或者贬损他们。

8.You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them. But the only thing you can't do is ignore them. Because they change things.

你可以赞美他们，引用他们，反对他们，质疑他们，颂扬或是诋毁他们，但唯独不能漠视他们。

9.You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them.

你可以引用他们，反对他们，质疑他们，颂扬或是诋毁他们。

10.It's unfair to vilify 污蔑 someone based on rumors.

仅仅基于谣言就对某人进行污蔑是不公平的。

11.Critics often vilify 污蔑 artists who challenge societal norms.

批评者常常对挑战社会规范的艺术家进行污蔑。

12.Some politicians vilify 污蔑 their opponents to gain public support.

一些政治家通过对对手进行污蔑来获得公众支持。

13.The media tends to vilify 污蔑 public figures when they make mistakes.

媒体往往在公众人物犯错误时对其进行污蔑。

14.He felt that the documentary vilified 污蔑 his contributions to the project.

他觉得这部纪录片对他在项目中的贡献进行了污蔑。

作文

In today’s society, it is not uncommon to see public figures being subjected to harsh criticism and negative portrayals. This phenomenon often leads to the tendency of people to vilify those who hold differing opinions or make controversial decisions. To vilify someone means to speak or write about them in a disparaging manner, often exaggerating their flaws and misdeeds while ignoring their positive attributes. This practice can have serious consequences, not only for the individuals targeted but also for the broader community. One of the most striking examples of this is seen in the realm of politics. Politicians are frequently vilified by their opponents, with opponents focusing on their mistakes, misstatements, or unpopular policies. This often results in a polarized environment where constructive dialogue is replaced by personal attacks. For instance, during election campaigns, candidates may vilify each other to gain an advantage, painting their opponents as untrustworthy or incompetent. Such tactics can manipulate public perception and lead to an environment filled with animosity rather than understanding. Moreover, the rise of social media has exacerbated the tendency to vilify. With the ability to share opinions rapidly and widely, individuals often engage in mob mentality, where they collectively vilify a person or group without fully understanding the context or the facts involved. This can lead to devastating consequences for the individuals involved, including damage to their reputation, mental health issues, and even career setbacks. The online environment can create a breeding ground for misinformation, where rumors and falsehoods spread quickly, further fueling the fire of vilification. However, it is essential to recognize that vilifying others does not foster a healthy or productive discourse. Instead of encouraging growth and understanding, it creates division and hostility. To combat this trend, it is crucial to promote empathy and critical thinking. We must strive to understand differing viewpoints and engage in respectful dialogue, rather than resorting to vilification. By doing so, we can create a more inclusive and understanding society where diverse opinions can coexist peacefully. In conclusion, the act of vilifying others is a detrimental practice that can have far-reaching effects on individuals and communities alike. It is essential to be aware of our language and actions, choosing instead to engage in constructive conversations that foster understanding and respect. By rejecting the urge to vilify, we can contribute to a healthier public discourse and work towards a society that values compassion over criticism. Understanding the impact of vilification can help us become more responsible communicators and advocates for positive change.

在当今社会，公众人物常常受到严厉的批评和负面描绘，这种现象并不少见。这种现象往往导致人们倾向于贬低那些持有不同观点或做出争议性决定的人。贬低某人意味着以贬损的方式谈论或写作他们，通常夸大他们的缺点和错误，同时忽视他们的积极特征。这种做法可能会产生严重的后果，不仅对被针对的个人造成影响，也对更广泛的社区产生影响。一个最引人注目的例子是在政治领域。政治家经常被对手贬低，对手专注于他们的错误、失言或不受欢迎的政策。这通常导致一种两极化的环境，在这种环境中，建设性的对话被个人攻击所取代。例如，在选举活动中，候选人可能会互相贬低，以获得优势，将对手描绘成不可信或无能的人。这种策略可以操控公众认知，并导致充满敌意而非理解的环境。此外，社交媒体的兴起加剧了贬低的趋势。由于能够快速和广泛地分享观点，个人常常参与暴民心态，在这种情况下，他们集体贬低一个人或群体，而没有充分理解相关背景或事实。这可能导致被涉及个体的声誉受损、心理健康问题，甚至职业挫折。在线环境可以成为错误信息的滋生地，谣言和虚假信息迅速传播，进一步助长了贬低的火焰。然而，必须认识到，贬低他人并不会促进健康或富有成效的讨论。它不仅不会鼓励成长和理解，反而会造成分裂和敌意。为了对抗这种趋势，促进同理心和批判性思维至关重要。我们必须努力理解不同的观点，并进行尊重的对话，而不是诉诸于贬低。通过这样做，我们可以创造一个更具包容性和理解的社会，使多样化的意见能够和平共存。总之，贬低他人的行为是一种有害的做法，可能对个人和社区产生深远的影响。意识到我们的语言和行为至关重要，而是选择参与建设性的对话，促进理解和尊重。通过拒绝贬低的冲动，我们可以为更健康的公共话语做出贡献，并努力实现一个重视同情而非批评的社会。理解贬低的影响可以帮助我们成为更负责任的沟通者和积极变革的倡导者。