acquitting

简明释义

英[əˈkwɪtɪŋ]美[əˈkwɪtɪŋ]

vt. 无罪释放；表现；脱卸义务和责任；清偿（acquit 的变形）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The testimony presented offered a strong case for acquitting her on grounds of self-defence.

所出示的证据为以正当防卫之由宣判她无罪提供了一个有说服力的理由。

2.British's nobility and pragmatism is not acquitting themselves well in all aspect of social life, but also show themselves in the British food and drink.

英国人高贵与务实不仅表现在社会生活的方方面面，其中也包括表现在饮食方面。

3.The jury debated for just three hours before acquitting Mr Posada on April 8th.

4月8日，陪审团只进行了三个小时的辩论就赦免了Posada先生。

4.British's nobility and pragmatism is not acquitting themselves well in all aspect of social life, but also show themselves in the British food and drink.

英国人高贵与务实不仅表现在社会生活的方方面面，其中也包括表现在饮食方面。

5.The jury found him not guilty, effectively acquitting 宣判无罪 him of all charges.

陪审团裁定他无罪，实际上是对他所有指控的acquitting 宣判无罪。

6.After a lengthy trial, the judge decided on acquitting 宣判无罪 the defendant due to lack of evidence.

经过漫长的审判，法官决定由于证据不足对被告进行acquitting 宣判无罪。

7.The attorney argued passionately for acquitting 宣判无罪 his client during the closing statements.

在总结发言中，律师热情地辩护以求对他的客户进行acquitting 宣判无罪。

8.The decision of acquitting 宣判无罪 was met with mixed reactions from the public.

对acquitting 宣判无罪的决定引起了公众的不同反应。

9.Despite the overwhelming evidence, the jury still chose acquitting 宣判无罪 the accused.

尽管证据确凿，陪审团仍然选择对被告进行acquitting 宣判无罪。

作文

In the realm of law and justice, the term acquitting holds significant weight. It is the act of declaring someone not guilty of a criminal charge, thereby releasing them from the accusations brought against them. The process of acquitting an individual is often complex and requires a thorough examination of evidence, testimonies, and legal arguments. This concept not only impacts the lives of those directly involved but also reflects the broader principles of justice and fairness in society.Consider a scenario where an individual is accused of theft. The prosecution presents their case, showcasing what they believe to be compelling evidence. However, the defense counters with alternative explanations and evidence that casts doubt on the prosecution's claims. After careful deliberation, the jury may reach a verdict of 'not guilty,' effectively acquitting the defendant. This decision underscores the fundamental principle that one is presumed innocent until proven guilty.The implications of acquitting someone extend beyond the courtroom. For the individual who has been found not guilty, it means a chance to rebuild their life without the stigma of a criminal record. They can pursue employment opportunities, engage with their community, and restore their reputation. On the other hand, the process of acquitting can also leave lasting impacts on the victims and their families, who may feel that justice has not been served.Moreover, the concept of acquitting raises important questions about the legal system itself. It challenges us to consider whether our laws are truly just and whether they adequately protect the rights of the accused. High-profile cases often spark public debate about the effectiveness of the judicial process and the societal perceptions surrounding guilt and innocence. In some instances, a verdict of acquitting can lead to public outcry, especially if the community feels that the evidence clearly pointed to guilt.In addition to its legal connotations, acquitting also has moral implications. It invites discussions about forgiveness, redemption, and the capacity for change. When someone is acquitted, it opens the door for dialogue about their actions and motivations. Society must grapple with the idea that people can make mistakes and that being found not guilty does not always equate to being innocent of wrongdoing.In conclusion, the act of acquitting is a powerful statement within the justice system. It embodies the core values of fairness, due process, and the presumption of innocence. While it brings relief to those who are acquitted, it also serves as a reminder of the complexities of human behavior and the need for a compassionate approach to justice. As we navigate the intricacies of law and morality, understanding the significance of acquitting helps us appreciate the delicate balance between accountability and forgiveness in our society.

在法律和正义的领域中，术语acquitting具有重要意义。它是宣告某人对刑事指控无罪的行为，从而使他们摆脱对他们提出的指控。acquitting一个人通常是复杂的过程，需要对证据、证词和法律论点进行彻底的审查。这个概念不仅影响直接参与的人，还反映了社会中正义和公平的更广泛原则。考虑一个场景，一个人被指控盗窃。检方提出他们认为具有说服力的证据。然而，辩方则以替代解释和证据反驳，质疑检方的主张。在仔细审议后，陪审团可能会得出“无罪”的裁决，有效地acquitting被告。这个决定强调了一个基本原则，即一个人被假定无罪，直到被证明有罪。Acquitting某人的影响超出了法庭。对于被判无罪的个人来说，这意味着有机会重建他们的生活，而不必承受刑事记录的污名。他们可以追求就业机会，参与社区活动，并恢复自己的声誉。另一方面，acquitting的过程也可能对受害者及其家庭产生持久的影响，他们可能会感到正义没有得到伸张。此外，acquitting的概念提出了关于法律系统本身的重要问题。它挑战我们思考我们的法律是否真正公正，是否充分保护被告的权利。高调案件通常引发公众对司法过程有效性的辩论，以及对罪与无罪的社会认知。在某些情况下，acquitting的裁决可能导致公众抗议，尤其是当社区感觉证据明显指向有罪时。除了法律含义外，acquitting还具有道德意义。它引发了关于宽恕、救赎和改变能力的讨论。当某人被acquitted时，它为关于他们的行为和动机的对话打开了大门。社会必须面对这样一个观点：人们可能会犯错误，而被判无罪并不总等于没有不当行为。总之，acquitting的行为在司法系统中是一个强有力的声明。它体现了公平、正当程序和无罪推定的核心价值。虽然它给被acquitted的人带来了解脱，但它也提醒我们人类行为的复杂性以及对正义的同情方法的必要性。在我们应对法律和道德的复杂性时，理解acquitting的重要性帮助我们欣赏社会中责任感与宽恕之间的微妙平衡。