stringent

简明释义

英[ˈstrɪndʒənt]美[ˈstrɪndʒənt]

adj. （规定或条件）严格的；紧缩的，银根紧的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.He announced that there would be more stringent controls on the possession of weapons.

他宣布在武器的持有方面将会有更严格的控制。

2.The Bank has put in place stringent financial disclosure rules for its employees.

世界银行已经对其官员采取了严格的金融公开规定。

3.For some, more stringent regulation even has a silver lining.

对一些人来说，更严谨的监管制度甚至可以带来黑暗中的一丝曙光。

4.Portugal has relaxed (a bit) its stringent rules on hiring and firing.

适当放松了雇佣和解聘规则。

5.The president has gone on television to defend stringent new security measures.

该总统在电视上为严格的新安全措施进行了辩护。

6.Therefore, their children grow up allodially without stringent demands.

所以，他们的孩子是没有被严格要求地长大的。

7.However, a stringent programme of fiscal retrenchment will also be necessary.

然而严格的财政缩减项目是必须的。

8.China has long applied stringent controls.

中国长期以来一直实行严厉的管制。

9.As such, it's not subject to any of the stringent laws governing physical systems.

因此，它不受制于任何一条掌管物理系统的法则。

10.Her stringent workout routine requires dedication and discipline.

她的严格的锻炼计划需要奉献和自律。

11.Due to the pandemic, many countries have enacted stringent travel restrictions.

由于疫情，许多国家实施了严格的旅行限制。

12.The company must comply with stringent safety standards in its manufacturing process.

公司必须遵守其生产过程中的严格的安全标准。

13.The government has imposed stringent regulations on air pollution to protect public health.

政府对空气污染实施了严格的法规以保护公众健康。

14.The school has a stringent policy regarding academic honesty.

学校对学术诚信有一项严格的政策。

作文

In today's world, environmental regulations are becoming increasingly important. Governments around the globe are implementing more stringent (严格的) policies to combat climate change and protect natural resources. These measures are essential for ensuring a sustainable future for generations to come. However, the question arises: are these stringent (严格的) regulations beneficial or burdensome for businesses? On one hand, stringent (严格的) regulations can drive innovation. Companies are often forced to develop new technologies and practices to comply with these rules. For instance, in the automotive industry, manufacturers have been pushed to create electric vehicles that meet stringent (严格的) emissions standards. This has led to significant advancements in battery technology and energy efficiency. Furthermore, businesses that adapt to these regulations can gain a competitive edge in an increasingly eco-conscious market. On the other hand, stringent (严格的) regulations can pose challenges for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The costs associated with compliance can be overwhelming, particularly for businesses with limited resources. For example, a small manufacturer may struggle to afford the necessary upgrades to their facilities to meet stringent (严格的) safety and environmental standards. This can lead to a situation where only larger corporations can thrive, ultimately reducing competition in the market. Moreover, the implementation of stringent (严格的) regulations can sometimes result in unintended consequences. For instance, if regulations are too harsh, companies might relocate to countries with less stringent (严格的) laws, leading to job losses in the original country. This phenomenon, known as regulatory arbitrage, can undermine the very goals that these regulations aim to achieve. Despite these challenges, it is crucial to recognize the importance of stringent (严格的) regulations in protecting our environment. Without them, businesses may prioritize profits over sustainability, leading to devastating consequences for our planet. The key lies in finding a balance between fostering economic growth and ensuring environmental protection. Governments should engage with businesses to understand their concerns and work collaboratively to create regulations that are both effective and feasible. By doing so, they can ensure that stringent (严格的) regulations do not stifle innovation but instead encourage it. This collaborative approach can lead to the development of new technologies that not only comply with regulations but also contribute to a healthier planet. In conclusion, while stringent (严格的) environmental regulations present challenges, they are essential for promoting sustainability and protecting our natural resources. It is vital for policymakers to strike a balance that supports both businesses and the environment. By fostering collaboration and innovation, we can create a future where stringent (严格的) regulations lead to positive outcomes for both the economy and the planet.

在当今世界，环境法规变得越来越重要。全球各国政府正在实施更为stringent（严格的）政策，以应对气候变化并保护自然资源。这些措施对于确保可持续的未来至关重要。然而，问题出现了：这些stringent（严格的）法规对企业是有益还是负担？一方面，stringent（严格的）法规可以推动创新。公司往往被迫开发新技术和实践以遵守这些规则。例如，在汽车行业，制造商被迫创造符合stringent（严格的）排放标准的电动车。这导致了电池技术和能源效率的显著进步。此外，适应这些法规的企业可以在日益关注环保的市场中获得竞争优势。另一方面，stringent（严格的）法规可能会给中小企业（SME）带来挑战。合规所需的成本可能是巨大的，特别是对于资源有限的企业。例如，一家小型制造商可能难以承担必要的设施升级费用，以满足stringent（严格的）安全和环境标准。这可能导致只有大型企业能够生存，最终减少市场竞争。此外，实施stringent（严格的）法规有时会导致意想不到的后果。例如，如果法规过于严厉，公司可能会迁移到法律不那么严格的国家，导致原国家的失业现象。这种现象被称为监管套利，可能会破坏这些法规旨在实现的目标。尽管面临这些挑战，但必须认识到stringent（严格的）法规在保护环境中的重要性。如果没有这些法规，企业可能会优先考虑利润而不是可持续性，从而导致对我们星球的毁灭性后果。关键在于找到促进经济增长与确保环境保护之间的平衡。政府应该与企业进行接触，以了解他们的担忧，并合作制定有效且可行的法规。通过这样做，他们可以确保stringent（严格的）法规不会抑制创新，而是鼓励它。这种合作的方法可以促使新技术的发展，不仅符合法规，还能为一个更健康的星球做出贡献。总之，虽然stringent（严格的）环境法规带来了挑战，但它们对于促进可持续性和保护我们的自然资源至关重要。政策制定者必须努力找到支持企业和环境之间的平衡。通过促进合作和创新，我们可以创造一个stringent（严格的）法规带来经济和地球双赢的未来。