illiberal

简明释义

英[ɪˈlɪbərəl]美[ɪˈlɪbərəl]

adj. 偏执的；吝啬的；粗鄙的；狭隘的；缺乏文化素养的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Instead, the very prospect of a common future, of global interdependence, has been jeopardized by the emergence of an illiberal world of tribes without flags.

相反，一个狭隘僵化的世界出现了，里面充满没有旗帜的部族，危及了共同未来与全球相互依存的前景。

2.Egypt’s Mubarak, Tunisia’s Ben Ali, and Syria’s Assad built brutal (and deeply illiberal) police states with strong secularist support.

埃及的穆巴拉克，突尼斯的本阿里，以及叙利亚的阿萨德都凭借强势的世俗主义支持建立起粗暴的（同时也是极度不自由的）警察国家。

3.It is true that the products of science have been put sometimes to illiberal USES.

科技产品的用途有时也与自由背道而驰。

4.Unfortunately, despite 2 1/2 years in the making, "The Heart of the Matter" never gets to the heart of the matter: the illiberal nature of liberal education at our leading colleges and universities.

不幸的是，尽管花了两年半的时间研究，“核心问题”报告从来没有深入到问题的核心：我们一流的学院和大学自由教育狭隘的本质。

5.The result would be an increasingly corporatist, illiberal Europe; growing frustration in Britain and annoyance in Brussels; and, perhaps, Britain's eventual exit from the union.

结果只能造就一个日益社团化的、狭隘的欧盟，英国越发失意，布鲁塞尔牢骚满腹。也许，最终，英国将从欧盟退出。

6.Ignorant is the most illiberal, because he has to face is a totally dark world.

无知者是最不自由的，因为他要面对的是一个完全黑暗的世界。

7.Nationalism now wears an illiberal face and it does so with pride.

民族主义现在呈现出一种狭隘的面貌，并对此颇感自豪。

8.This illiberal turn in attitudes to migration is no surprise. It is the result of cyclical economic gloom combined with a secular rise in pressure on rich countries’ borders.

各国在对待移民态度上变得这么气量狭小不足为奇，这是周期性经济萧条和长期增长的富国边境压力协同作用的结果。

9.It would be not only illiberal-people should be allowed to indulge in their pleasures, even lethal ones-but also ineffective.

这不仅非法——人们有沉溺于快乐中的权利，即便这种快乐是致命的——而且无效。

10.The government's illiberal 不自由的 policies have sparked widespread protests among citizens.

政府的不自由的政策引发了公民的大规模抗议。

11.The illiberal 不自由的 attitude of the administration has alienated many voters.

政府的不自由的态度使许多选民感到疏远。

12.The rise of illiberal 不自由的 democracies is a concerning trend in global politics.

在全球政治中，不自由的民主制度的兴起是一个令人担忧的趋势。

13.In an illiberal 不自由的 society, dissenting voices are often silenced.

在一个不自由的社会中，异议的声音往往被压制。

14.Many argue that illiberal 不自由的 regimes often suppress freedom of speech.

许多人认为，不自由的政权往往压制言论自由。

作文

In today's rapidly changing world, the concept of freedom is often discussed, yet it is crucial to recognize that not all forms of governance or societal structures promote true liberty. One term that embodies a significant challenge to individual freedoms is illiberal (不自由的). An illiberal society is one where the government restricts personal freedoms, often under the guise of maintaining order or promoting a particular ideology. This essay explores the implications of illiberal practices on society and the importance of safeguarding democratic values.To begin with, it is essential to understand what constitutes an illiberal regime. Such regimes may employ various tactics to suppress dissent, including censorship of the media, limitations on freedom of speech, and persecution of political opponents. For instance, countries that have adopted illiberal policies often control the narrative presented to the public, manipulating information to maintain their power. This creates an environment where citizens are unable to access diverse viewpoints, ultimately stifling critical thinking and informed decision-making.Moreover, the consequences of living in an illiberal society extend beyond mere restrictions on speech. They can lead to a culture of fear, where individuals hesitate to express their opinions or challenge the status quo. This suppression of dissent can hinder social progress, as innovative ideas and constructive criticism are essential for the evolution of any society. In contrast, societies that embrace liberal values tend to foster creativity and open dialogue, allowing for a more dynamic and adaptable community.The rise of illiberal movements in various parts of the world serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of democracy. Leaders who promise stability and security often gain popularity by appealing to nationalistic sentiments, yet their policies frequently undermine the very freedoms that define a democratic society. For example, the erosion of judicial independence and the curtailing of civil liberties are common characteristics of illiberal governments. These actions not only threaten individual rights but also weaken the institutions that uphold democracy, making it increasingly difficult for citizens to hold their leaders accountable.Furthermore, the global implications of illiberal practices cannot be overlooked. As nations become more illiberal, international relations may suffer. Countries that prioritize authoritarianism over collaboration may find themselves isolated on the global stage, as other nations seek to align with those that respect human rights and democratic principles. This isolation can lead to economic downturns and diminished influence, ultimately harming the citizens of illiberal states.In conclusion, the dangers of illiberal governance are profound and far-reaching. It is imperative for citizens to remain vigilant and advocate for their rights and freedoms. By understanding the characteristics and consequences of illiberal societies, individuals can work towards fostering a culture of openness and accountability. Only through active engagement and a commitment to democratic values can we hope to prevent the rise of illiberal practices and ensure a future where liberty and justice prevail for all individuals.

在当今快速变化的世界中，自由的概念常常被讨论，但至关重要的是要认识到，并非所有形式的治理或社会结构都促进真正的自由。一个体现对个人自由重大挑战的术语是illiberal（不自由的）。一个illiberal社会是指政府限制个人自由，通常以维持秩序或促进特定意识形态为名。本文探讨了illiberal做法对社会的影响以及保护民主价值观的重要性。首先，理解什么构成illiberal政权是至关重要的。这种政权可能会采用各种策略来压制异议，包括媒体审查、言论自由的限制和对政治对手的迫害。例如，采取illiberal政策的国家通常控制公众所接触的信息，操纵信息以维持其权力。这创造了一个公民无法获取多样化观点的环境，最终扼杀了批判性思维和知情决策。此外，生活在illiberal社会中的后果不仅仅是言论的限制。它们可能导致一种恐惧文化，个人在表达意见或挑战现状时犹豫不决。这种对异议的压制可能阻碍社会进步，因为创新思想和建设性批评对于任何社会的发展至关重要。相反，拥抱自由价值观的社会往往培养创造力和开放对话，从而形成一个更具活力和适应性的社区。在世界各地illiberal运动的兴起，清楚地提醒我们民主的脆弱性。那些承诺稳定和安全的领导者，往往通过迎合民族主义情绪获得人气，但他们的政策往往会削弱定义民主社会的自由。例如，司法独立的侵蚀和公民自由的削减是illiberal政府的共同特征。这些行为不仅威胁个人权利，还削弱了维护民主的机构，使公民越来越难以追究领导者的责任。此外，illiberal做法的全球影响也不容忽视。随着国家变得越来越illiberal，国际关系可能会受到影响。优先考虑集权而非合作的国家，可能会发现自己在全球舞台上孤立，因为其他国家寻求与尊重人权和民主原则的国家对齐。这种孤立可能导致经济衰退和影响力下降，最终损害illiberal国家的公民。总之，illiberal治理的危险是深远而广泛的。公民必须保持警惕，倡导自己的权利和自由。通过理解illiberal社会的特征和后果，个人可以努力培养开放和问责的文化。只有通过积极参与和对民主价值观的承诺，我们才能希望防止illiberal做法的兴起，并确保未来每个人的自由和正义得以实现。