groupthink

简明释义

英[ˈɡruːpθɪŋk]美[ˈɡrʊpˌθɪŋk]

n. （决策水平低下的）集体决策，趋同思维

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.It is not just boards that suffer from groupthink; entire sectors do.

不是只有董事会才会形成群体思维；它也可能出现在整个行业中。

2.No doubt groupthink explains why some boards end up committing to an idiotic course of action.

毫无疑问，集体思维解释了一些董事会之所以最终得出愚蠢做法的原因。

3.However, because groupthink has similar causes to polarization, much the same approach can be used.

然而，由于趋同思维与极化现象具有类似的原因，大致上适用于趋同思维的方法也适用于极化现象。

4.The lesson of the latest IPCC row is that its authors and organisers must fight harder against groupthink—and speedily implement the new conflict-of-interest policy.

从气候委员会最新一系列事件中所吸取的教训就是，它的作者和组织都必须更加尽力地对抗群体思维——并且迅速实施新的利益冲突政策。

5.This has caused critics to grumble that despite their professed free-thinking, Apple aficionados are actually suffused with groupthink. It's an interesting irony.

这一点已引起了激烈的批评，更不用说他们标榜的自由思想，苹果的狂热者中弥漫着集体的思维，这简直是一种讽刺。

6.Its main conclusion - that Banks need more women on boards to combat groupthink - is one of our main arguments.

它的主要结论：银行需要更多女人来对抗小集团思想，是一大争论焦点。

7.Mr Mauboussin argues that problems occur when diversity breaks down and “groupthink” starts to take over.

毛布森（Mausoussin）先生认为，当差别性不发生作用，“集体商议”开始起效时，问题便会发生。

8."Groupthink" describes a process by which intelligent individuals, working in a group, can reach a worry-free outlook that is not justified by the facts.

“群体决策”说的则是这样一个过程，诸多的高知识的个体，组成一个群体，他们可以达成一项表面上无需担忧的答案，然而这种答案却是未经实践验证的。

9.The project failed due to groupthink that stifled creative solutions.

该项目因群体思维抑制了创造性解决方案而失败。

10.The team fell into groupthink, making decisions without considering alternative viewpoints.

团队陷入了群体思维，在没有考虑其他观点的情况下做出决策。

11.In a state of groupthink, employees may hesitate to voice their concerns.

在群体思维的状态下，员工可能会犹豫不决，不敢表达自己的担忧。

12.The board's decision was influenced by groupthink, leading to a lack of innovation.

董事会的决定受到群体思维的影响，导致缺乏创新。

13.To avoid groupthink, the manager encouraged open discussions during meetings.

为了避免群体思维，经理在会议期间鼓励开放讨论。

作文

Group decision-making is a common practice in many organizations, but it often leads to a phenomenon known as groupthink. Groupthink refers to a psychological phenomenon where the desire for harmony or conformity in a group results in irrational or dysfunctional decision-making. Members of the group prioritize consensus over critical analysis, which can lead to poor outcomes. This essay will explore the concept of groupthink, its causes, consequences, and ways to mitigate its effects.One of the primary causes of groupthink is the pressure to conform. In a group setting, individuals may feel compelled to agree with the majority opinion, even if they have reservations. This is particularly evident in hierarchical organizations where subordinates may hesitate to voice dissenting opinions for fear of backlash or ostracism. Additionally, strong leadership can exacerbate groupthink, as leaders who are overly confident in their views may discourage alternative perspectives. The consequences of groupthink can be severe. Historical examples illustrate how groupthink has led to disastrous decisions. For instance, the Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 is often cited as a classic case of groupthink. President John F. Kennedy and his advisors failed to critically evaluate the risks involved in the operation, leading to a significant political and military failure. Similarly, the Challenger Space Shuttle disaster in 1986 was partly attributed to groupthink, as engineers at NASA overlooked crucial safety concerns due to the prevailing group consensus.To combat groupthink, organizations can implement several strategies. First, fostering an open environment where diverse opinions are encouraged is essential. Leaders should actively solicit input from all members, especially those who may be reluctant to speak up. Techniques such as brainstorming sessions or anonymous surveys can help facilitate this process. Second, establishing a devil's advocate role within the group can encourage critical thinking. By designating someone to challenge ideas and assumptions, groups can avoid the pitfalls of groupthink and make more informed decisions.Another effective strategy is to break larger groups into smaller, independent teams. This approach allows for a variety of perspectives to emerge and reduces the pressure to conform. Each team can analyze the situation and present their findings to the larger group, promoting healthy debate and discussion. Finally, providing training on the dangers of groupthink and decision-making processes can raise awareness and equip members with the tools to recognize and address it.In conclusion, groupthink is a significant barrier to effective decision-making in groups. By understanding its causes and consequences, organizations can take proactive steps to minimize its impact. Encouraging open dialogue, assigning a devil’s advocate, and breaking into smaller teams are just a few strategies that can help mitigate the risks associated with groupthink. Ultimately, fostering a culture that values diverse viewpoints will lead to better decision-making and more successful outcomes for organizations.

集体决策是许多组织中的一种常见做法，但它往往会导致一种现象，称为群体思维。群体思维指的是一种心理现象，其中对和谐或一致性的渴望导致群体在决策时表现出非理性或功能失调的行为。群体成员优先考虑共识而非批判性分析，这可能导致不良结果。本文将探讨群体思维的概念、其原因、后果以及缓解其影响的方法。造成群体思维的主要原因之一是从众压力。在小组环境中，个人可能会感到被迫同意大多数人的观点，即使他们有保留。这在等级制度明显的组织中尤为明显，下属可能因为害怕报复或被孤立而犹豫不决地表达反对意见。此外，强势领导也可能加剧群体思维，因为过于自信的领导者可能会抑制替代观点。群体思维的后果可能是严重的。历史实例表明，群体思维如何导致灾难性的决策。例如，1961年的猪湾入侵事件通常被视为群体思维的经典案例。约翰·F·肯尼迪总统及其顾问未能对行动涉及的风险进行批判性评估，导致了重大的政治和军事失败。同样，1986年挑战者号航天飞机灾难部分归因于群体思维，因为美国国家航空航天局的工程师们由于主流共识而忽视了关键的安全问题。为了解决群体思维，组织可以实施几种策略。首先，营造一个鼓励多样意见的开放环境至关重要。领导者应积极征求所有成员的意见，特别是那些可能不愿发言的人。头脑风暴会议或匿名调查等技术可以帮助促进这一过程。其次，在小组中设立“反对派”角色可以鼓励批判性思维。通过指定某人来挑战想法和假设，群体可以避免群体思维的陷阱，并做出更明智的决策。另一个有效的策略是将较大的团队分成较小的独立小组。这种方法使各种观点得以出现，并减少了从众的压力。每个小组可以分析情况并向更大的团队呈现他们的发现，促进健康的辩论和讨论。最后，提供有关群体思维危险性和决策过程的培训可以提高意识，使成员具备识别和应对它的工具。总之，群体思维是群体有效决策的重大障碍。通过理解其原因和后果，组织可以采取主动措施来最小化其影响。鼓励开放对话、指定反对派以及分成更小的团队只是一些可以帮助减轻与群体思维相关风险的策略。最终，培养重视多样观点的文化将导致更好的决策和组织更成功的结果。