publishable

简明释义

英[ˈpʌblɪʃəbəl]美[ˈpʌblɪʃəbəl]

adj. 可出版的；可发表的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.So even though that work was anecdotal and not blinded and not publishable, it was very convincing.

所以那个研究尽管是纯叙述性的，非盲测的，而且无法出版，却非常具有说服力。

2.You’re not going to have any chanceof writing a publishable novel if you ditch it three chapters in.

如果你写了三章就放弃写作，那你不会有发表小说的机会。

3.After development, the project moves to the deployment stage during which the developed components are exposed as publishable, location-transparent, and discoverable services.

开发完成之后，项目就进入部署阶段，在此期间会将已开发的组件作为可发布的、位置透明且可发现的服务进行公开。

4.When a DCR is approved and published by an editor, a publishable version is generated from the XML source.

当d CR被编辑人员批准和发布后，可发布的版本就从xml源文件中生成。

5.After development, the project moves to the deployment stage during which the developed components are exposed as publishable, location-transparent, and discoverable services.

开发完成之后，项目就进入部署阶段，在此期间会将已开发的组件作为可发布的、位置透明且可发现的服务进行公开。

6.The company announced today that Events will now be publishable through the same Publisher tool that all your status messages are posted in.

公司今天宣布，活动的发布也可以通过用户之前更新状态信息的发布工具来发布的。

7.You could train yourself to type faster and write two thousand words an hour, but they’ll never be great literature; chances are, they’ll never even be publishable.

你可能将自己训练能快速的在一个小时里写出2000字，但是它们绝不会是很好的文学作品，有可能，它们永远也不会被发表。

8.Is it just the power of fads? Does it only occur in the United States? Is it primarily academic competitiveness (new ideas as more publishable)?

这是一种时尚的力量吗？这仅仅发生在美国吗？这是学术竞赛的结果(新的观点更容易出版)吗？

9.The research paper was deemed publishable after several rounds of peer review.

经过几轮同行评审，这篇研究论文被认为是可发表的。

10.Only publishable content is accepted for the academic journal.

只有可发表的内容才能被学术期刊接受。

11.She worked hard to ensure that her thesis was publishable before graduation.

她努力确保她的论文在毕业前是可发表的。

12.Her blog posts are often publishable and attract a lot of readers.

她的博客文章常常是可发表的，吸引了很多读者。

13.The editor suggested revisions to make the article more publishable.

编辑建议进行修改，使文章更具可发表性。

作文

In today's digital age, the concept of what constitutes a publishable work has evolved significantly. Traditionally, publishable referred to written content that met certain standards of quality and relevance, often determined by publishers and editors. However, with the rise of self-publishing and online platforms, the criteria for publishable material have broadened, allowing more voices to be heard. This democratization of publishing has both positive and negative implications for writers and readers alike.One of the most significant advantages of this shift is the increased accessibility for aspiring authors. In the past, getting a book or article published often required navigating a complex web of gatekeepers, including literary agents and traditional publishers. Today, anyone with a computer and an internet connection can share their thoughts, stories, and expertise with a global audience. This has led to a surge in diverse perspectives and niche topics that may have been overlooked by mainstream publishers. For instance, many independent authors have found success in genres like fantasy, romance, and self-help, where they can connect directly with their target audience without the constraints of traditional publishing.However, this new landscape also raises questions about quality and credibility. With so much content available online, it can be challenging for readers to discern what is truly publishable. The absence of rigorous editorial processes means that not all self-published works meet the standards of traditional publications. As a result, readers may encounter poorly written or factually inaccurate information, which can undermine the trustworthiness of the medium as a whole.Moreover, the definition of publishable has become increasingly subjective. What one person considers publishable, another might deem unworthy of attention. This subjectivity can lead to a dilution of literary and journalistic standards, as the focus shifts from quality to quantity. Writers may feel pressured to produce content rapidly to keep up with the demands of social media and online engagement, potentially sacrificing depth and substance in favor of speed.Despite these challenges, there remains a strong desire for high-quality, publishable content. Readers are still drawn to well-researched articles, compelling narratives, and thought-provoking essays. As a result, some platforms have emerged that aim to curate content and maintain higher standards for publication. These platforms often employ editorial teams to review submissions, ensuring that only the best work is shared with their audiences. This hybrid approach allows for both the inclusivity of self-publishing and the quality control of traditional publishing.In conclusion, the notion of what is publishable has transformed in the digital era, creating opportunities and challenges for writers and readers. While self-publishing has opened doors for many, it has also blurred the lines regarding quality and credibility. As we continue to navigate this evolving landscape, it is crucial for both writers and readers to remain discerning, seeking out publishable works that inspire, inform, and entertain. Ultimately, the future of publishing will depend on our collective commitment to uphold the standards of excellence that ensure the integrity of the written word.

在当今数字时代，什么构成可出版作品的概念发生了显著变化。传统上，可出版指的是符合某些质量和相关性标准的书面内容，这些标准通常由出版商和编辑决定。然而，随着自助出版和在线平台的兴起，可出版材料的标准已经扩大，使更多的声音得以被听到。这种出版的民主化对作家和读者都有积极和消极的影响。这种转变最显著的好处之一是为有抱负的作者提供了更大的可及性。在过去，出版一本书或文章通常需要穿越复杂的守门人网络，包括文学代理人和传统出版商。今天，任何拥有计算机和互联网连接的人都可以与全球受众分享他们的想法、故事和专业知识。这导致了多样化的视角和小众主题的激增，这些主题可能被主流出版商忽视。例如，许多独立作者在幻想、浪漫和自助等类型中找到了成功，他们可以直接与目标受众联系，而不受传统出版的限制。然而，这种新格局也引发了关于质量和可信度的问题。由于在线有如此多的内容，读者可能很难分辨什么是真正的可出版。缺乏严格的编辑流程意味着并非所有自助出版的作品都达到传统出版物的标准。因此，读者可能会遇到写得不好的或事实不准确的信息，这可能会削弱整个媒介的可信度。此外，可出版的定义变得越来越主观。一个人认为可出版的东西，另一个人可能会认为不值得关注。这种主观性可能导致文学和新闻标准的稀释，因为焦点从质量转向数量。作家可能会感到压力，迅速生产内容以跟上社交媒体和在线互动的需求，从而可能牺牲深度和实质，以追求速度。尽管面临这些挑战，人们仍然渴望高质量的可出版内容。读者仍然被经过充分研究的文章、引人入胜的叙述和发人深省的散文所吸引。因此，一些平台应运而生，旨在策划内容并维护更高的出版标准。这些平台通常雇佣编辑团队来审查提交，确保只有最好的作品与他们的受众分享。这种混合方法允许自助出版的包容性和传统出版的质量控制。总之，在数字时代，什么是可出版的概念发生了转变，为作家和读者创造了机遇和挑战。虽然自助出版为许多人打开了大门，但它也模糊了关于质量和可信度的界限。在我们继续导航这一不断发展的格局时，作家和读者都必须保持敏锐，寻找那些激励、启发和娱乐的可出版作品。最终，出版的未来将取决于我们共同致力于维护卓越标准，以确保书面文字的完整性。